You are here

Home » Content

OECD Ülkelerinde Gelir Dağılımının Gelir Eşitsizliği İndeksleri ile Değerlendirilmesi

Evaluation of Income Distribution in OECD Countries with Income Inequality Indexes

Journal Name:

  • Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2016

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Income inequality is an indicator of how material resources are distributed across society. Some people consider high levels of income inequality are morally undesirable. Others focus on income inequality as bad for economic progress of country (OECD Report; 2015). Chile, Mexcio and Turkey had the highest income inequality. OECD Anglophone countries had levels of inequality around or above the OECD average. From this point of view, this study aims to analyze the income inequality for OECD countries. For this aim, we use some indexes to analyze inequality. These indexes are GINI Index, GNI, Atkinson Index and Decile Ratio.We use spatial econometric techniques to evaluate the differences in terms of inequality for OECD countries. Results are obtained from GeoDA 1.8.8 Software Package Programme. As a result of analysis, Turkey, Chile and Mexico have the lowest value in terms of income inequality indexes, this means that in these countries, income inequality have highest value among OECD countries. The datas of indexes are about 2015 and the results are obtained using GeoDa 1.8.8 Software Package Programme.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Gelir eşitsizliği, kaynakların toplum içerisinde bireyler açısından ne şekilde dağılım gösterdiğini ölçen bir göstergedir. Bu nedenle yüksek gelir eşitsizliği toplumda bireyler tarafından arzu edilmemektedir. Bazı insanlar da, gelir eşitsizliğinin ülkenin ekonomik gelişimi açısından olumsuz olacağını düşünmektedir. (OECD Raporu, 2015). Şili, Meksika ve Türkiye en yüksek gelir eşitsizliğine sahip ülkelerdir. Dili İngilizce olan OECD ülkelerinde gelir eşitsizliği, ya OECD ortalama seyrindedir ya da üzerindedir. Bu noktadan hareketle, çalışmanın amacı, OECD ülkelerinde gelir eşitsizliğini analiz etmektir. Bu amaçla, çalışmada gelir eşitsizliğine dair indeksler kullanılmıştır. Bu indeksler; GINI katsayısı, GNI (Toplam Milli Gelir), Atkinson İndeksi ve Desil Oranıdır. Çalışmada mekânsal ekonometrik teknikler kullanılmıştır. Çıktılar, GeoDa 1.8.8 paket programı ile elde edilmiştir. Analizden elde edilen sonuçlara göre, Türkiye, Şili ve Meksika’da indeksler en yüksek değerlere sahiptir. Yani OECD ülkeleri arasında en yüksek gelir eşitsizliğine sahip ülkeler bunlardır. Çalışmada, 2015 yılına ait veriler kullanılmış olup, bulgular GeoDa 1.8.8 paket programı yardımıyla elde edilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-oecd-ulkelerinde-gelir-dagiliminin-gelir-esitsizligi-indeksleri-ile-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 4
153
170
  • Turkish

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Annoni, Paola and Kozovska, Kornelia (2010), “EU Regional
Competitiveness Index 2010”, JRC Scientific and Technical
Reports, European Commission Joint Research Centre.
Anselin, Luc (1988), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models,
Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Anselin, Luc (1995), “Local Indicators of Spatial Association-LISA”,
Geographical Analysis, Vol. 27, Iss. 2, p. 93-115.
Atkinson, A.B. (1975), The Economics of Inequality, Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
Berg, Andrew G. & Ostry, Jonathan D. (2011), “Inequality and
Unsustainable Growth: Two Sides of the Same Coin ”, IMF Staff
Discussion Note, SDN/11/08.
I. ÇETİN ve D. MURAT
169 Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi,2016, yıl: 4, cilt: 4, sayı: 4
Corak, Miles (2013). “Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and
IntergenerationaL Mobility”, Discussion Paper No. 7520.
Cowell, Frank (1998), “Measurement of Inequality”, Discussion Paper No.
DARP/36.
Dacey, Michael F. (1965), A Review Measures of Contiguity for Two and kcolor
Maps, Northwestern University.
Gastwirth, Joseph L. (1972). “The Estimation of the Lorenz Curve and Gini
Index”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 54(3), pp. 306-
316.
Geary, R. C. (1954), “The Contiguity Ratio and Statistical Mapping”, The
Incorporated Statistician, Vol.5, pp. 115-145.
Gold R., Kawachi I., Kennedy B.P. et al. (2001), “Ecological Analysis of
Teen Birth Rates: Association with Community Income and
Income Inequality”, Matern Child Health, Vol. 51, Iss. 61, p. 161-
167.
ILO, IMF, OECD & The World Bank Report (2015), “Income Inequality
and Labour Income Share in G20 Countries: Trends, Impacts and
Causes”.
Krishna Iyer, P. V. A. (1949), “The First and Second Moments of Some
Probability Distributions Arising from Points on a Lattice and
Their Applications”, Biometrika, Vol. 36, p. 135-141.
Krueger, Dirk & Perri, Fabrizio (2005). “Does Income Inequality Lead to
Consumption Inequality Evidence and Theory”,
Kusnic, Michael W. & Davanzo, Julie (1980), “Income Inequality and the
Definition of Income: The Case of Malaysia”, Agency for
International Development, R-2416-AID.
LeSage, James P. (1997), “Regression Analysis of Spatial Data”, The
Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Vol. 27, Iss. 2, p. 83-94.
Lorenzo, Giovanni Bellù & Paolo Lİberati (2005), “Charting Income
Inequality the Lorenz Curve”, Food and Agriculture Organization
of the United Nations, FAO.
Maio, Fernando G De (2007). “Income Inequality Measures”, Journal of
Epidemiology & Community Health, Vol. 61, Iss. 10, p. 849-852.
Moran, PAP (1948). “The Interpretation of Statistical Maps”, Journal of the
Royal Statistical Society, Series B 37, p. 243-251.
Moser, Mathias & Schnetzer, Matthias (2014). “The Geography of Average
Income and Inequality: Spatial Evidence from Austria”,
Department of Economics, Working Paper No.191.
OECD Ülkelerinde Gelir Dağılımının Gelir Eşitsizliği İndeksleri İle Değerlendirilmesi
170 Research Journal of Politics, Economics and Management, 2016, Year:4, Volume:4, Issue:4
OECD, Income Inequality, https://data.oecd.org/inequality/incomeinequality.
htm#indicator-chart, 02.09.2016.
OECD, Poverty, https://data.oecd.org/inequality/poverty-gap.htm#indicatorchart
Erişim: 02.09.2016.
OECD (2015), “Growth and Income Inequality: Trends and Policy
Implications”, OECD Economic Department, Policy Note No. 26.
Ostry, Jonathan, Berg, Andrew & Tsangarides, Charalambos (2014),
“Redistribution, Inequality and Sustainable Growth: Reconsidering
the Evidence”, http://voxeu.org/article/redistribution-inequalityand-
sustainable-growth, Erişim: 02.09.2016.
Pede, Valerien O., Sparks, Adam H. and McKinley, Justin D. (2012).
“Regional Income Inequality and Economic Growth: A Spatial
Econometrics Analysis for Provinces in the Philippines”,
Australian Agricultural & Resource Economics Society Annual
Conference, Fremantle, Western Australia.
Robinson, Arthur H. (1956), “The Necessity of Weighting Values in
Correlation Analysis of Areal Data”, Annals of the Association of
American Geographers, Vol. 43, p. 226-249.
Rowlingson, Karen (2011). “Does Income Inequality Cause Health and
Social Problems ”, www.jrf.org.uk Erişim: 07.09.2016
Thomas, Edwin Neal (1960). “Maps of Residuals from Regression: Their
Characteristics and Uses in Geographic Research”, State
University of Iowa, Department of Geography, Report, 2.
World Bank (2015).
http://www.worldbank.org/depweb/beyond/beyondco/beg_05.pdf
Erişim: 01.09.2016.
OECD Report (2015). http://www.oecd.org/berlin/47570121.pdf Erişim:
01.09.2016.
OECD, https://data.oecd.org/inequality/poverty-gap.htm#indicator-chart
OECD, https://data.oecd.org/inequality/incomeinequality.htm#indicatorchart

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com