You are here

360 Derece Performans Değerleme Sisteminde Farklı Pozisyonlar İçin Dört Kaynaktan Performanslar Üzerine Bir Araştırma

An Investigation on the Ratings from Four Sources for Different Positions in a 360 Degree Feedback System

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The 360 degrees performance appraisal system, which is considered as the most popular evaluation system today, is based on the idea that the evaluations obtained from different sources are more objective and comprehensive. Since the system gives the employee a chance to evaluate him/herself and others, it is commonly preferred. It is in-vestigated whether rater has a similar effect on the leni-ency of ratings from four sources (self, supervisor, peer, and subordinate) in multi-source assessment process. In this study, the establishment and implementation of a 360-degree performance appraisal system for all task po-sitions including both white and blue-collar personnel in a medium-sized furniture business is discussed. A total of 200 employees (39 white collar employees, 17 foremen and 144 workers) from all functional areas and reputa-tional roles participated in the study. The findings indicate that the influence of bias on ratings was significantly greater in self, subordinate and peer feedback than in su-pervisor feedback.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Günümüzde en popular değerlendirme sistemi olarak ka-bul edilen 360 derece performans değerleme sistemi, farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen değerlemelerin daha ob-jektif ve kapsamlı olduğu görüşüne dayanmaktadır. Bu system, çalışana kendisini ve diğerlerini değerlendirme şansı tanıdığından, yaygın tercih edilmektedir. Çok kaynaklı değerleme sürecinde, dört kaynaktan (kendisi, yönetici, arkadaş ve ast) değerlemelerinde değerley-icinin aynı hoşgörüye sahip olup olmadığı araştırılmak-tadır. Bu çalışmada, orta ölçekli bir mobilya işletmesinde, hem beyaz hem de mavi yakalı personeli kapsayan tüm görev pozisyonları için 360 derece performans değerleme sistemin kurulması ve uygulaması ele alınmıştır. Tüm fonksiyonel alanlardan ve pozisyonlardan toplam 200 çalışan (39 beyaz yakalı, 17 ustabaşı, 144 işçi) çalışmaya katılmıştır. Bulgular, değerlemelerde önyargı etkisinin, kendi, ast ve arkadaş değerlemelerinde yönetici değerle-mesinden daha fazla olduğunu göstermiştir.
49
64

REFERENCES

References: 

Akal, Z. (2005), İşletmelerde Performans Ölçüm ve Denetimi: Çok Yönlü Performans Göstergeleri, 6.Baskı, Milli Prodüktivite
Merkezi Yayınları No: 473. Ankara.
Akdemir, A. (2009), İşletmeciliğin Temel Bilgileri, Ekin Yayınları, Bursa.
Antonioni, D. ; H. Park (2001), “The relationship between rater affect and three sources of 360-degree feedback ratings”,
Journal of Management, 27: 479-495.
Antonioni, D. ; D.J. Woehr (2000), “Improving the quality of multi-source rater performance”, In D.W. Bracken, C.W.
Timmreck, and A.H. Church (Eds.). Handbook of Multisource Feedback (pp. 114-129). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Atwater, L.E.; C. Ostroff; F.J. Yammarino; J.W. Fleenor (1998), “Self-other agreement: Does it really matter?”, Personnel
Psychology, 51 : 577-598.
Baltacı, A. İ.; H.Burgazoğlu (2014), “Değerlendiriciler Arası Güvenilirlik ve Tatmin Bağlamında 360 Derece Performans
Değerlendirme”, Marmara Üniversitesi Öneri Dergisi, 11 (41): 57-76.
Barutçugil, İ. (2002), Performans Yönetimi, 2. Basım, Kariyer Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
Beehr, T.A.; L. Ivanitskaya; C.P. Hansen; D. Erofeev; D. Gudanowski (2001), “Evaluation of 360 degree feedback ratings:
Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors”, Journal of Organizational Behavior,
22: 775-788.
Bettenhausen, K.L.; D.B. Fedor (1997), “Peer and upward appraisals: A comparison of their benefits and problems”,
Group and Organizational Management, 22: 236-263.
Borman, W.C. (1974), “The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternative approach”, Organizational Behavior
and Human Performance, 12: 105-124.
Borman, W.C.; S.J. Motowidlo (1993), “Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance”,
In N.Schmitt and W.C. Borman (Eds), Personnel Selection in Organizations (pp. 71-98), New York, Jossey-
Bass.
Borman, W.C.; L.A. White; E.D. Pulakos; S.H. Oppler (1991), “Models of supervisory job performance ratings”, Journal
of Applied Psychology, 76 (6): 863-872.
Brutus, S.; S. Petosa; E. Aucoin (2005), “Who will evaluate me? Rater selection in multi-source assessment contexts”,
International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13 (2): 129-138.
Cardy, R.L. and G.H. Dobbins (1986), “Affect and appraisal accuracy: Liking as an integral dimension in evaluating performance”,
Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 672-678.
Coates, D.E. (1998), “Don’t tie 360 feedback to pay”, Training, 35: 68-78.
Coleman, V.I. ; W.C. Borman (2000), “Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain”,
Human Resource Management Review, 10 (1) : 25-44.
Decotiis, T. ; A.Petit (1978), “The performance appraisal process: A model and some testable propositions”, Academy
of Management Review, 3: 635-646.
DeNisi, A.S.; T.P. Cafferty; B.M. Meglino (1984), “A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: a model and
research propositions”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33 (3): 360-396.
DeNisi, A.S. ; K.J. Williams (1988), “Cognitive approaches to performance appraisal”, Research in Personnel and Human
Resources Management, 6: 109-155.
Feldman, J.M. (1981), “Beyond attribution theory: cognitive process in performance appraisal”, Journal of Applied Psychology,
66: 863-872.
Ferris, G.R.; T.A. Judge; K.M. Rowland; D.E. Fitzgibbons (1994), “Subordinate influence and the performance evaluation
process: Test of a model”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 58: 101-135.
Fletcher, C.; C.Baldry (1999), “Multi-source feedback systems: A research perspective”, International Review of
Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 14: 149-193.
Goodman, S.A. ; D.J. Svyantek (1999), “Person-organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter”,
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55: 254-275.
Landy, F.J.; J.L. Farr (1980), “Performance ratings”, Psychological Bulletin, 87: 72-107.
London, M.; R.W. Beatty (1993), “360-degree feedback as a competitive advantage”, Human Resource Management,
32: 353-372.
Aralık 2017, C. 12, S. 3
63
Moorman, R.H.; D.L. Wells (2003), “Can electronic performance monitoring be fair? Exploring relationship among monitoring
characteristics, perceived fairness, and job performance”, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies,
20 (2): 2-16.
Moser, K.; H. Schuler; U.Funke (1999), “The moderating effect of raters’ opportunities to observe ratees’ job performance
on the validity of an assessment centre”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7 (3): 133-141.
Motowidlo, S.J.; W.C. Borman; M.J. Schmit (1997), “A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance”,
Human Performance, 10 (2): 71-83.
Murphy, K.R.; J.N. Cleveland (1991), Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
Murphy, K.R. ; J.N. Cleveland (1995), Understanding performance appraisal: Social organizational, and goal-based perspectives.
Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
Robbins, T.L.; A.S. DeNisi (1994), “A closer look at interpersonal affect as a distinct influence on cognitive processing in
performance evaluations”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 341-353.
Robbins, T.L.; A.S. DeNisi (1998), “Mood vs. interpersonal affect: Identifying process and rating distortions in performance
appraisal”, Journal of Business and Psychology, 12 (3): 313-325.
Sabuncuoğlu, Z. (2000), İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Ezgi Kitabevi, Bursa.
Schmitt, N. ; I. Robertson (1990), “Personnel selection”, Annual Review of Psychology, 41: 289-319.
Sundvik, L.; M. Lindeman (1998); “Performance rating accuracy: Convergence between supervisor assessment and sales
productivity”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6 (1): 9-15.
Tornow, W.W. (1993), “Editor’s note: Introduction to special issue on 360-degree feedback”, Human Resource Management,
32: 211-220.
Tsui, A.S.; B.Barry (1986), “Interpersonal affect and rating errors”, Academy of Management Journal, 29 (3): 586-599.
Uygur, A.; S. Sümerli Sarıgül (2015), “360 Derece Performans Değerleme ve Geri Bildirim Sistemi”, Selçuk Üniversitesi
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 33: 189-201.
Van Scotter, J.R. (2000), “Relationships of task performance and contextual performance with turnover, job satisfaction,
and affective commitment”, Human Resource Management Review, 10 (1): 79-95.
Waldman, D.A.; L.E. Atwater; D. Antonioni (1998), “Has 360-degree feedback gone amok?” Academy of management
Executive, 12: 86-94.
Varma, A.; S.Pichler; E.S. Srinivas (2005), “The role of interpersonal affect in performance appraisal : Evidence from two
samples – the US and India”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(11): 2029-2044.
Werner, J.M. (2000), “Implications of OCB and contextual performance for human resource management”, Human
Resource Management Review, 10 (1): 3-24.
Witt, L.A.; K.M.Kacmar; D.S. Carlson; S. Zivnuska (2002), “Interactive effects of personality and organizational politics
on contextual performance”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 911-926.
Yun, G.J., L.M.Donahue; N.M. Dudley; L.A. McFarland (2005), “Rater personality, rating format, and social context: Implications
for performance appraisal ratings”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13 (2): 97-107.
Zajonc, R.B. (1980), “Feeling and thinking: Preferences need to inferences”, American Psychologist, 35: 151-175.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com