Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS, INCLUDING LEARNING STYLES, AND THEIR PERCEPTIONS AND SATISFACTION IN WEB-BASED COURSES IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Journal Name:

  • The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Distance education and web-based courses are mainstream in the United States higher education and growing (NCES, 2003) involving over 80% of four year public universities in 2002. The National Academy of Science review of ―how people learn‖ suggests that technology-mediated learning can be used to respond to students‘ preferences and related characteristics. This investigation of the relationships between learners‘ characteristics and their perception of web-based learning and satisfaction with their course used Kolb‘s (1984) Learning Styles Inventory and Walker‘s (2003) distance education learning environment instrument plus demographic questions to survey 279 students in five web-based undergraduate courses in a Midwestern university. The study founds that the three dimensions of Moore‘s Transactional Distance Theory may be linked with Kolb‘s two dimensional views of individual learning styles. For example, introductory biology courses with high structure are perceived as more satisfactory by students who prefer a more ―abstract conceptual‖ learning style for ―knowledge grasping.‖ The author recommends that courses are designed to accommodate multiple learning styles with variety on all dimensions of transactional distance.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-relationship-between-student-characteristics-including-learning-styles-and-their-perceptions-and-satisfaction-web-based-courses-higher-education.pdf
  • 1
123-138
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Alomyan, H., & Au, W. (2004). Exploration of instructional strategies and individual
difference within the context of Web-based learning. International Education Journal,
4(4), 86-91.
Anderson, T. (1997). Integrating lectures and electronic course materials. Innovations
in Education and Training International, 34(1), 24 - 31.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.. C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th
ed.). Forth Worth: Harcourt Brace.
Carnevale, D. (2000). ―Accrediting bodies consider new standards‖. Education at a
Distance, 14(8), Retrieved January 12, 2005 from
http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/AUG00_Issue/PDF/accrediting.pdf
Chute, A. G., Thompson, M. M., & Hancock, B. W. (1999). The McGraw-Hill handbook of
distance learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dick, W. & Cary, L. (1990).The systematic design of instruction, (3rd Ed.). New York:
Harper Collins.
136
Federico, P. (2000). Learning styles and student attitudes toward various aspects of
network-based instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 359–379.
Freeth, B. (2004). Tool for evaluation of Web-based instruction. Retrieved March 3,
2005 from http://home.earthlink.net/~bfree8725/webevaltool.pdf
Garrison, D. R. (2000). ―Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st
century: a shift from structural to transactional issues‖. International Review of
Research in Open and Distance Learning,1(1). Retrieved March 3, 2005 from
http://www.irrodl.org/content/v1.1/randy.pdf
Hart, G. (1995). Learning styles and hypertext: exploring user attitudes. Retrieved
February 10, 2005 from
http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne95/smtu/papers/hart.pdf
Henke, H. (1997). Evaluating Web-based instruction design. Retrieved 9 January, 2005
from http://www.scis.nova.edu/~henkeh/story1.htm
Hills, H. (2003). Individual preferences in e-learning. Burlington, VT: Gower.
Khan, B. H. (2005). Managing e-learning: design, delivery, implementation and
evaluation. Hershey: Information Science.
Kolb, D. A., (1976). Learning style inventory. Boston: McBer and Company.
Kolb, D. A., (1984). Experiential learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C., (2001). Experiential learning theory:
Previous research and new directions. In R. Sternberg, & L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives
on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles, p. 227-247. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Association.
Kolb, D. A. (1999). The Kolb learning style inventory, version 3. Boston: Hay Group.
Kolb, A. Y. and D.A. Kolb (2005). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory – Version 3.1, 2005
Technical Specifications. Retrieved February 10, 2006 from
http://www.learningfromexperience.com
Koohang, A, Durante, A. (2003). Learners‘ perceptions toward the Web-based distance
learning activities/assignments portion of an undergraduate hybrid instructional
model. Journal of Information Technology Education, 105-113.
Laurillard, D. (2001). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use
of educational technology. London: Routledge.
Lee, Y., Driscoll, M., and Nelson, D. (2004). The past, present, and future of research in
distance education: Results of a content analysis. The American Journal of Distance
Education, 18(4), 225-242.
Lynch, M. M. (2002). The online educator: A guide to creating the virtual classroom.
New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
137
Mason, R. (1994). Using communications media in open and flexible learning. London:
Kogan Page.
Mason, R. and Weller, M. (2000). Factors affecting students' satisfaction on a web
course. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 173-200.
MeBmer, R. M., & Schmitz, S. (2004). Gender demands on e-learning. In K. Morgan, C.
A. Brebbia, J. Sanchez & A. Voiskounsky (Eds.), Human perspectives in the Internet
society: culture, psychology and gender, 245-254. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
Mertler, C. A., & Vannata, R. A. (2002). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods:
Practical application and interpretation advanced and multivariate statistical methods
(2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Pyrczak publishing.
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical
principles of distance education. New York: Routledge, 22-38.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Distance education: a learning system. Lifelong Learning, 8-11.
Moore, M. and Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view, (2nd Ed.).
Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
National Education Association, (2000). Benchmarks for success in Internet-based
distance education. Retrieved January 9, 2005 from
http://www.ihep.com/Pubs/PDF/Quality.pdf
NCES, (2003). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000–
2001. Retrieved February 18, 2005 from
http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/peqis/publications/2003017
Oh, E., & Lim, D. (2005). Cross relationship between cognitive styles and learner
variables in online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1),
53-66.
Romiszowski, A. (2004). How‘s the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or
failure of an educational technology innovation. Educational Technology, 44(1), 5–27.
Sabry, K., & Baldwin, L. (2003). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 443-454.
Savicki, V., Dawn, L., & Merle, K. (1996). "Gender language style and group composition
in Internet discussion groups." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2(3).
Retrieved February 22, 2005 from
http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue3/savicki.html
Schwitzer, A. M., Ancis, J. R., & Bown, N. (2001). Promoting student learning and
student development at a distance. Lanham, MD: American College Personnel
Association.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2000). Teaching and learning at
a distance: Foundations of distance education. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
138
Smith, P.L. & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River,
New Jersey: Merrill.
Sussman, N. M., & Tyson, D. H. (2000). Sex and power. Gender differences in computermediated
interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(3), 381-394.
Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. NY:
HarperCollins.
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), The State of the World's Children 2004 (New
York: UNICEF, 2003).
Walker, S. (2003). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance
education learning environments in higher education: The distance education learning
environments survey (DELES). Unpublished Doctor of Science Education Thesis, Curtin
University of Technology, Perth. Retrieved February 22, 2005 from
http://adt.curtin.edu.au/theses/available/adt-WCU20040211.095711
Weiten, W. (1989). Pshychology: themes and variations. Belmont, California:
Brooks/Cole publishing.
Willcoxson, L., Prosser, M. (1996) "Kolb‘s Learning Style Inventory (1985): Review and
further study of validity and reliability" British Journal of Educational Psychology 66:
247-257

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com