Buradasınız

SOCIAL NETWORKING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION: Undergraduate Students’ Views on Ning

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
It was the aim of this study to investigate physical education undergraduate students’ views on the use of social networking, one of the most typical representations of Web 2.0 technologies. In order to do so, the researcher, who was the instructor of the class, entitled “Fair Play Education in Sport”, introduced Ning and its educational aspects to her students with a 50-minute presentation prior to the study. Following this, the students were encouraged to use this networking for 15 weeks in parallel with their class. During this application, the researcher helped the students to make the best use of Ning in educational settings. Upon the implementation, the researcher interviewed the students (n=19) in five groups on the basis of the questions prepared and piloted earlier. The interviews demonstrated that the students enjoyed using social networking in educational settings. The findings of the study were the following: Increasing student-student and teacher-student interaction, enhancing student motivation and classroom climate, sharing materials with the instructor and students, making use of students’ interests and needs, and making learning process more interesting and permanent. The research concluded that social networking could be used in PE classes effectively.
277-290

REFERENCES

References: 

Abbitt, J. (2007). Exploring the educational possibilities for a user-driven social content system in an undergraduate course. MERLOT J Online Learning and Teaching. 3(4), 437-447.
Ajjan, H, & Harsthone, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education. 11: 71–80.
Albion, P.R. (2007). Web 2. 0 in teacher education: Two imperatives for action; Retrieved from 201Hhttp://www.haworthpress.com/store/find.asp
287
Bartlett-Bragg, A. (2006). Reflections on pedagogy: Reframing practice to foster informal earning with social software. Retrieved from 202Hhttp://matchsz.inf.elte.hu/TT/docs/Anne20Bartlett-Bragg.pdf
Boyd D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. J Computer-Mediated Community, 13(1), 276-297.
Caldwell, J., Toman, N. & Leahy, J. (2006). Diversity and difference in the learning experience of students in contemporary mass Higher Education. Paper presented at NUI Galway 4th Annual Conference on Teaching and Learning 8–9 June.
Campbell, A. (2006). Language Learning Ecologies. 203Hhttp://dekita.org/weblog/language-learning-ecologies
Conole, G, & Creanor, L. (2007). In their own words: Exploring the learner's perspective on e-learning. Retrieved from 204Hhttp://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearningpedagogy/iowfi...
Coutinho, C.P., & Bottentuit Junior, JB. (2008). Web 2.0 in Portuguese academic community: an exploratory survey. In K. McFerrin, R Weber, R Carslen and A Willis (Eds), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education. 1992-1999.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Research methods in applied linguistics: quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2007.
Dron, J. (2007). Designing the undesignable: Social software and control. Educational Technology and Society, 10(3), 60-71.
Fischman, J. (2008). Dear professor, students want to chat with you. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from 205Hhttp://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/3384/dear-professor-students-wa...
Frommer, D. (2011). Ning's Second Coming Is Chugging Along, On Its Way To A $30 Million Revenue Run Rate, Dan. Business Insider. Retrieved from 206Hhttp://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-02-03/tech/29973776_1_social-ne...
Geron, T. (2011). 207HWith Revenue Up 400%, Ning Adds Paid Access Service. Forbes. Retrieved from 208Hhttp://www.forbes.com/sites/tomiogeron/2011/06/15/with-revenue-up-400-ni...
Gillet, D. El, Helou, S., Chiu Man, Y., & Salzmann, C. (2008). Turning web 2.0 social software into versatile collaborative learning solutions. Paper presented at the Advances in Computer-Human Interaction on the First International Conference. Retrieved from 209Hhttp://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/111941/files/AHCI_08_submitted.pdf?ver...
Gross, R. & Acquisti, A. (2005). Privacy and information revelation in online social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM CCS Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society.
288
Gura, M., & Percy, B. (2005). Recapturing technology for education: keeping tomorrow in today's Classrooms. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield
Güclü, M. (2010). University Students’ Computer Skills: A Comparative Analysis. TOJET, 9(2), 264-269.
Hewitt, A., & Forte A. (2006). Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Paper presented at CSCW, Banff, Alberta. Retrieved from 210Hhttp://www.andreaforte.net/HewittForteCSCWPoster2006.pdf
Keleş, E., & Demirel, P. (2011). Using Facebook In Formal Education As A Social Network. 5th International Computer and Instructional Technologies Symposium, 22-24 September, Fırat University, Elazığ-Turkey.
Ladda, S., Keating, T., Adams, D., & Toscano, L. (2004). Including technology in instructional programs. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 75(4).
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1998). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1998.
Lazerte, D. K. S., & Lathrop, AH. (2006). Hot links to cool stuff: Website technology in the elementary school physical education classroom, 14-20.
Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2007). Using web 2. 0 for learning in the community. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 196-203.
Mazman, S.G., & Usluel, Y.K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers and Education, 55(2), 444-453.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43.
Mohnsen, B. (2008). Using technology in physical education (6th ed.). Cerritos, CA, Bonnies's Fitware Inc.
Norris, P. (2002). The bridging and bonding role of online communities. Press/Politics, 7(3), 3-13.
Ozsoy, S. (2011). Use of Media by Turkish Fans in Sport Communication: Facebook and Twitter. Journal of Human Kinetics. 28, 165-176.
Panitz, T. (1996). Collaborative versus cooperative learning- A comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. Retrieved from 211Hhttp://home.capecod.net/~tpanitz/tedsarticles/coopdefinition.html
Papastergiou, M. (2011). Physical Education and Sport Science Undergraduate Students as Multimedia and Web Developers: Moving From The User’s To The Creator’s Perspective. Educational and Information Technologies. 16(3), 281-299.
Pennington, T., Wilkinson, C., & Vance, J. (2004). Physical educators online: what is on the minds of teachers in the trenches? The Physical Educator, 61(1), 45–56.
289
Pettenati, M. C., & Ranieri, M. (2006). Informal learning theories and tools to support knowledge management. In distributed CoPs. TEL-CoPs'06: 1st International Workshop on Building Technology Enhanced Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-4.
Q’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Retrieved from 212Hhttp://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
Raines, C. (2005). Meet the generations. Retrieved from 213Hhttp://www.generationsatwork.com/prereading.html
Rebecca, M, Duncan-Howell, & Jennifer, A. (2008). Facebook© goes to college: using social networking tools to support students undertaking teaching practicum. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 4(4), 596-601.
Resnick, P. (2001). Beyond bowling together: Socio technical capital. In J. Carroll (Ed.), HCI in the New Millennium (pp. 647-672). New York: Addison-Wesley.
Richardson, T. (2008). How web 2. 0 has changed the face of education. Retrieved from 214Hhttp://www.ncc.co.uk/article/?articleid=13295
Russo, A., Watkins, J., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2009). The impact of social media on informal learning in museums. Educational Media International. 46 (2): 153-166.
Schugurensky, D. (2000). The forms of informal learning: Towards a connceptualization of the field. Retrieved from 215Hhttp://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/2733/2/19formsofinforma...
Selwyn, N. (2007a). 216HScrew Blackboard, do it on Facebook! An Investigation of Student's Educational use of Facebook. Retrieved from 217Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/513958/Facebook-seminar-paper-Selwyn
Selwyn, N. (2007b) Screw blackboard... Do it on Facebook! An investigation of students' educational use of Facebook. Retrieved from 218Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/513958/Facebookseminarpaper-Selwyn
Sezen-Balçıkanlı, G. (2009). Use of Visual Media in Fair Play Instruction in Sports: A YouTube Case. European Conference for Academic Disciplines. Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Siemens, G. (2007). Digital natives and immigrants: A concept beyond its best before date. 219Hhttp://connectivism.ca/blog/2007/10/digital_natives_and_immigrants.html
Silverman, S. (1997). Technology and physical education: present, possibilities, and potential problems. Quest, 49, 306–314.
Siskos, A., Antoniou, A., Papaioannou, A., & Laparidis, K. (2005). Effects of multimedia computerassisted instruction (MCAI) on academic achievement in physical education of Greek primary students. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 10, 61–77.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). 220HBasics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
290
Thornburg, R,. & Hill, K. (2004). Using Internet assessment tools for health and physical education instruction. Technology Trends, 48(6), 53–70.
Toman, N., Leahy, J., & Caldwell, J. (2005). The Learning Culture of Students in Contemporary Mass Higher Education. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference-What a Difference a Pedagogy Makes.
Vernadakis, N., Giannousi, M., Tsitskari, E., Antoniou, P., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. A (2012). Comparison of Student Satisfaction between Traditional and Blended Technology Course Offerings in Physical Education. TOJDE, 13(1).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1978.
Wellman, B., Haase, AQ., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2010). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436-455.
Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved from 221Hhttp://www.vpit.ualberta.ca/cop/doc/wenger.doc on June 21, 2009.
Windham, C. (2005). Father Google and Mother IM: Confessions of a Net Gen Learner. Educause Review, 40(5), 43-58.
Windham, C. (2005). The student's perspective. In D. G. Oblinger and J. L. Oblinger (Eds), Educating the Net generation. Retrieved from 222Hhttp://www.educause.edu/TheStudent%27sPerspective/6061
Wubbels, T. (2007). Do we know a community of practice when we see one? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(2), 225-233.
Yaman, M. (2007a) The Attitudes of Physical Education Students Towards Internet. TOJET, 6(3).
Yaman, M. (2007b). The Competence of Physical Education Teachers in Computer Use. TOJET, 6(4).
Yaman, M. (2009). Perceptions of Students on the Application of Distance Education in Physical Education Lessons. TOJET, 8(1), 65-74

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com