Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

GERMAN DOGUE, DOBERMAN VE DEV SCHNAUTZER KÖPEK YAVRULARINDA SOSYALIZASYON ÖZELLIKLERI ÜZERINE İKI MIZAÇ TESTI KULLANILARAK ARAŞTIRMALAR

Studies on Socialization Characteristics Using Two Temperament Tests in German Dogue, Doberman and Riesenschnautzer Puppies

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The object of study was the influence of the nervous system type (temperament) of dogs from the German Dogue, Doberman, and Riesenschnautzer breeds on the extent of their socialization (adaptation to the environment). Two tests were used to examine the animals’ behavior: the mirror test and the Queinnec test. It was established that puppies of the German Dogue breed possessed the highest socializing capabilities, followed by the Riesenschnautzer and Doberman breeds. This means that the representatives of the German Dogue breed would require the least amount of training time in order to form specific behavior. The Riesenschnautzer exhibited average ability to socialize, and will adapt to the environment more easily than the Doberman breed and with more hardship than the German Dogue. The puppies that would be hardest to train were the ones from the Doberman breed, as they are most prone to aggression and ill temper.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
The object of study was the influence of the nervous system type (temperament) of dogs from the German Dogue, Doberman, and Riesenschnautzer breeds on the extent of their socialization (adaptation to the environment). Two tests were used to examine the animals’ behavior: the mirror test and the Queinnec test. It was established that puppies of the German Dogue breed possessed the highest socializing capabilities, followed by the Riesenschnautzer and Doberman breeds. This means that the representatives of the German Dogue breed would require the least amount of training time in order to form specific behavior. The Riesenschnautzer exhibited average ability to socialize, and will adapt to the environment more easily than the Doberman breed and with more hardship than the German Dogue. The puppies that would be hardest to train were the ones from the Doberman breed, as they are most prone to aggression and ill temper.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-german-dogue-doberman-dev-schnautzer-kopek-yavrularinda-sosyalizasyon-ozellikleri-uzerine-iki-mizac-testi-kullanilarak-arastirmalar.pdf
  • 1
43-51
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Arata, S., Momozawa, Y., Takeuchi, Y., Mori, Y,
2010. Important behavioral traits for predicting
guide dog qualification. Journal of Veterinary
Medicine Science 72, 539-545.
Campan, R., Scapini, F, 2002. Les causes proximales
du comportement. In: Ethologie. Approche
systematique du comportement, De Boeck,
Bruxelles, Belgium, pp. 35-98.
Denkov, V., 1996. Dog Encyclopaedia, Horizon
Publishing House, Sofia, pp. 30-35.
Diederich, C., 1998. Les tests comportementaux chez
le chien. Le point de vue du chercheur, Le
monde veterinaire 59, 19-27
Diederich C., Giffroy, J. M., 2006. Behavioural
testing in dogs: a review of methodology in
search for standardisation, Applied Animal
Behavioral Science 97, 51-72.
Giffroy, J. M., 1998. Evolution des relations
comportementales entre l’homme et le chien.
“Le chien dans la societe”, Séminaire de la
Société Francophone de Cynotechnie,, Paris,
France.
Haverbeke, A., Rzepa, C., Depiereux, E., Deroo, J.,
Giffroy, J. M., Diederich, C., 2010. Assessing
efficiency of a new behavioural modification
programme on fearfulness and aggressiveness
of military dogs. Applied Behavioral Science,
123,143-149.
Houpt, K.A., 2007. Review article genetics of canine
Behavior. Acta Veterinaria Brno 76, 431-444.
Keeling, L., Jensen, T, 2002. Behavioural
disturbances, stress and welfare. In: Jensen P.
(ed.): The Ethology of Domestic Animals. An
introductory text. CABI Publishing, UK, pp. 79 -78.
Ley, J.M., Bennett, P.C., Coleman, G. J., 2009. A
refinement and validation of the Monash Canine
Personality Questionnaire (MCPQ). Applied
Animal Behavioral Science 116, 220-227.
Mitsulov, A., 1993. Dog breeds in Bulgaria, Sofia,
pp. 11; 62-63, 112-113.
Montagnier, H., 1998, Le chien et l’enfant. Aspects
medicaux et comportementaux. Le chien dans la
societe, Séminaire de la Société Francophone
de Cynotechnie, Paris, France,.
Petkov, A., Enev, E., Sivkova, S., Varlyakov, I..,
Oblakov, N., 1999. Canine Behaviour, Stara
Zagora, pp. 161-183.
Queinnec, G., 1996. Les troubles du comportement et
leur correction. Le comportement social du
chien, Séminaire de la Société Francophone de
Cynotechnie, Lyon, France, pp. 76-120.
Renaud, S., 1996. Test utilizes pour l’analyse du
caractere. Le comportement social du chien,
Séminaire de la Société Francophone de
Cynotechnie, Lyon, France, p. 30.
Saetre, P., Strandberg, E., Sundgren, P.E.,
Pettersson, U., Jazin, E., Bergstrom, T.F.,
2006. The genetic contribution to canine
personality. Genes, Brain, Behavior 5, 240-248.
Uzunova, K., 2006. Investigation of some hygienic and
technological parameters of rearing facilities for
dogs, PhD Thesis, pp. 108-113.
Uzunova, K., Semerdjiev V., Stoyanchev, K.,
Russenov, A., Tsandev, N., Yonkova, P.,
2008. Effect of temperament type on
socialization among companion dogs, Trakia
Journal of Sciences 6, 33-35.
Uzunova, K., Mitev, Y., Miteva, Tch, Vashin, I.,
2009. Prediction of the behaviour of puppies
using tests with regard to their humane
treatment and welfare, Trakia Journal of
Sciences 7, 51-53.
Uzunova, K., Radev, V., Varliakov, I., 2010.
Socialization of puppies – a marker of their
future behaviour, Trakia Journal of Sciences 8,
70-73.
Vastrade, F., 1996. La socialization du chiot et son
evaluation. Le comportement social du chien,
Séminaire de la Société Francophone de
Cynotechnie, Lyon, France, pp. 157-177.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com