Buradasınız

SOSYAL GÜVENLİK SİSTEMİ AÇISINDAN GÜVENCELİ ESNEKLİK

FLEXICURITY IN TERMS OF SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Flexicurity is a fact that synchronically interests and impresses employee and employer. Flexicurity fact becomes concrete with some genuine provisions. This provision is appropriate law framework, active labour market policies, lifelong learning and social security system. In this study, it is aimed to analyze flexicurity fact in the context of social security systems. In this reasons, income security and combination security are explicated through social security systems.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Güvenceli esneklik olgusu, işçi ve işveren taraflarını eş zamanlı olarak ilgilendiren ve etkileyen bir niteliğe sahiptir. Kavram, özgün bir takım koşullar ile somutlaşmaktadır. Söz konusu koşullar; uygun yasal temel, aktif işgücü piyasası politikaları, yaşam boyu eğitim ve sosyal güvenlik sistemidir. Çalışmada, güvenceli esneklik olgusunun sosyal güvenlik sistemleri açısından incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, güvenceli esnekliğin içerdiği gelir ve bağdaştırma güvenceleri sosyal güvenlik sistemleri bağlamında ele alınmaktadır.
73-110

REFERENCES

References: 

Andaç, F. (2010). İşsizlik sigortası. Ankara: TÜHİS Yayınları.
Andersen, S. K. ve Mailand, M. (2005). The Danish flexicurity model: the
role of the collective bargaining system. Employment Relations Research Centre
Department of Sociology (FAOS), Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Antoniades, A. (2008). Social Europe and/ or global Europe? globalization
and flexicurity as debates on the future of Europe. Cambridge Review of
International Affairs, 21 (3): 327-346.
Arıcı, K. (1999). Sosyal güvenlik dersleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Balcı, İ. B. (2008). Türk sosyal güvenlik sisteminde son gelişmeler.
Çalışma ve Toplum, 16 (1): 85–107.
Bekker, S. ve Wilthagen, T. (2008). Europe’s pathways to flexicurity:
lessons presented from and to the Netherlands. Intereconomics–Review of
European Economic Policy, 43 (2): 68-73.
Blanpain, R. (2006). European labour law. 10
th
Publishing, The
Netherlands: Kluwer Law International Publishing.
Boeri, T. (2002). “Does Europe Need a Harmonised Social Policy?”
Competition of Regions and Integration in EMU 30
th
Economics Conference: 55-64. Vienna: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.
Bovenberg, A. L. (2007). The life-course perspective and social policies:
an overview of the issues. Modernising social policy for the new life course İçinde:
23-76. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Chung, H. (2005). Different paths towards flexibility: deregulated
employment protection or temporary employment. Munich Personel RePEc
Archive (MPRA) Working Paper, No. 2396.
Demirbilek, S. (2005). Sosyal güvenlik sosyolojisi. İzmir: Legal Yayıncılık.
Demirsat, D. (2009). Avrupa Birliği’ne üye ülkelerde güvenceli esnekliğin
işgücü piyasasına etkisi ve Türkiye. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Dokuz
Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
Erdut, T. (1998). Yeni teknolojilerin iş ilişkileri üzerindeki etkisi. Ankara:
TÜHİS Yayınları.
Esping–Andersen, G. (1990). The three w orlds of welfare capitalism. New
Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Esping–Andersen, G. ve Regini, M. (2000). Why deregulate labour
markets? New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
EUROFOUND, (2010). Extending flexicurity: the potential of short-time
working schemes. European Restructuring Monitor (ERM) Report. Luxembourg:
Publications Office of the European Union.
EUROFOUND. (2007). Foundation findings: flexicurity–issues and
challenges. Denmark: Office for Official Publications of the European
Communities.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2007). Gender equality law in the
European Union. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European
Communities.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2009). Industrial relations in Europe 2008.
Luxembourg: Directorate–General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal
Opportunities.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2007). Towards common principles of
flexicurity: more and better jobs through flexibility and security. Belgium:
Directorate–General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
Fagan, C. ve Walthery, P. (2007). The role and effectiveness of time
policies for reconciliation of care responsibilities. Modernising social policy for the
new life course İçinde: 75-116. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Gehrmann, T. (2007). The development of Danish flexicurity and possible
lessons for America. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Norwegian School of
Economics and Business Administration, Bergen.
Ghai, D. (2002). Social security priorities and patterns: a global
perspective. International Labour Organization Discussion Paper, No: 141/ 2002,
Geneva: Internaional Labour Office.
Ginneken, W. V. (2003). Extending social security: policies for developing
countries. Extension of Social Security (ESS) Paper, No: 13, Geneva: International
Labour Office.
Gümüş, E. (2010). Türkiye’de sosyal güvenlik sistemi: mevcut durum,
sorunlar ve öneriler. SETA Analiz (Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Toplum Araştırmaları
Vakfı), 24.
Hutsebaut, M. (2003). Social protection in Europe: a European trade union
perspective. International Social Security Review, 56 (1): 53-74.
ILO. (1984). Introduction to social security. Geneva: International Labour
Office.
ILO. (2001). Social security: a new consensus. Geneva : International
Labour Office.ILO. (2010). World social security report 2010/ 11: providing coverage in
times of crisis and beyond. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Kapar, R. (2005). Aktif işgücü piyasası politikaları. İstanbul Üniversitesi
İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası Prof. Dr. Toker Dereli’ye Armağan Özel Sayısı, 55 (1):
341-371.
Kapar, R. (2005). Sosyal korumanın işgücü piyasasına etkisi. İstanbul:
Birleşik Metal-İş Yayınları.
Keller, B. ve Seifert, H. (2004). Fle xicurity: the German trajectory.
Transfer-European Review of Labour and Research, 10 (2): 226-247.
Larsen, T. P. (2010). Flexicurity from the individual’s work-life balance
perspective: coping with the flaws in European child- and eldercare provision.
Journal of Industrial Relations, 52 (5): 575-593.
Leschke, J. (2006). Are unemployment insurance systems in Europe
adapting to news risks arising from non-standard employment. DULBEA Working
Papers, No. 07-05, Brussels: Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
Madsen, P. K. (2006). Flexicurity: a new perspective on labour m arkets
and welfare states in Europe. CARMA Research Paper, No. 3, Centre for Labour
Market Research.
MISSOC. (2008). Missoc analysis 2008–social protection: aspects of
flexicurity and active inclusion. Mutual Information System on Social Protection in
the EU Member States and the EEA.
Pacelli, L., Devicienti, F., Miada, A., Morini, M., Poggi, A. ve Vesan, P.
(2008). Employment security and employability: a contribution to the flexicurity
debate. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Peeters, H., Debels, A., Verschraegen, G. ve Berghman, J. (2007).
Flexicurity in Bismarckian countries? old age protection for non–standard workers
in Belgium . Journal of Social Policy, 37 (1): 125-143.
Räisänen, H. (2006). The changes in the structure of labour markets. İçinde
Reconciling labour flexibility with social cohesion–ideas for political action: 47-68. Belgium: Council of Europe Publishing.
Ray, R., Gornick, J. C. ve Schmitt, J. (2009). Parental leave policies in 21
countries: assessing generosity and gender equality. CEPR (Center for Economic
and Policy Research) Reports and Issue Briefs, No. 23.
Sapir, A. (2006). Globalisation and the reform of European social models.
Journal of Common Market Studies, 44 (2): 369-390.
Spattini, S. (2008). Social protection systems reforms and flexicurity from
an European perspective. www.csmb.unimore.it/online/Home/Prova/documento
36007568.html (17.02.2011).
Temiz, H. E. (2004). Eğreti istihdam: işgücü piyasasında güvencesizliğin
ve istikrarsızlığın yeni yapılanması. Çalışma ve Toplum, 2 (2): 55-80.
Tros, F. (2010). Flexibility and security for older workers: HRM-Arrangements in Four European Countries. Working and ageing: emerging
theories and empirical perspectives İçinde: 132-165. Luxembourg: CEDEFOP
Publications Office of the European Union.
Tuncay, C ve Ekmekçi, Ömer. (2009). Yeni mevzuat açısından sosyal
güvenlik hukukunun esasları. 2. Baskı. İstanbul: Legal Yayıncılık.
Turan, E. (2003). Sosyal güvenlik hakkı. Kamu–İş İş Hukuku ve İktisat
Dergisi, 7 (3): 319-332.
Turan, S. (2005). Öğrenen toplumlara doğru Avrupa Birliği eğitim
politikalarında yaşam boyu öğrenme. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, 5 (1):
87-98.
Uşen, Ş. (2007). Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri ve Türkiye’de aktif emek piyasası
politikaları. Çalışma ve Toplum, 13 (2): 65-95.
Wilthagen, T. ve Tros, F. (2003). Dealing with the ‘flexibility–security–
nexus’: institutions, strategies, opportunities and barriers. University of Amsterdam
Working Paper, No. 9, Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour
Studies.
Wilthagen, T. ve Tros, F. (2004). The concept of ‘flexicurity’: a new
approach to regulating employment and labour markets. Transfer– European
Review of Labour and Research, 10 (2): 166-186.
Valverde, M., Tregaskis, O. ve Brewster, C. (2000). Labor flexibility and
firm performance. International Advances in Economic Research, 6 (4): 649-661.
Zhou, J. (2007). Danish for all? balancing flexibility with security: the
flexicurity model. IMF Working Paper, Paper No: 07/ 36

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com