Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Algısının İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerindeki Etkisi

The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Perception on The Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Corporate social responsibility activities influence the stakeholders in the first place, hence the employees, one of the vital stakeholders of the organizations. Social responsibility activities can have a direct effect on the job satisfaction and organizational commitment of employees. This paper investigates the employees’ perception on corporate social responsibility, and examines the effect of this perception on organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Hence, the individual factors that have an impact on this perception, namely gender, age, education level, the hierarchical position in the organization, the working time and the participation to the company’s social responsibility projects, are considered. The data collection is through a survey conducted among the employees of Turkish Petroleum Refineries Corporation (TUPRAS), the third most profitable and the largest private firm quoted to the Borsa Istanbul. From the findings obtained through chi square, t-test and ANOVA, one can observe an insignificant relation between organizational commitment and job satisfaction, and perceptions of corporate social responsibilities.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Günümüzde şirketlerin sorumlulukları ekonomik ve yasal olduğu kadar ahlaki ve kamusal temellere de dayanmaktadır. Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk uygulamaları örgütlerin en önemli paydaşlarından biri olan çalışanları da etkilemektedir. Bu uygulamalar çalışanların örgütsel bağlılık ve iş tatminlerini etkileyebilmektedir. Bu çalışma çalışanların kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk algısını ve bu algının çalışanların iş tatmini ve örgütsel bağlılık etkilerini araştırmaktadır. Bu amaçla çalışanların cinsiyeti, yaşı, eğitim düzeyi, kurum içi pozisyonu, işletmede çalışma süresi ve sosyal sorumluluk projelerine katılımı olmak üzere toplam altı bireysel faktörün etkisi incelenmektedir. Bu çalışma TÜPRAŞ çalışanları ile yapılan anketlere dayanmaktadır. Elde edilen veriler ki-kare, t-test ve anova testlerine tabi tutulmuştur. Bulgulara göre çalışanların kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk algılamaları ile onların örgütsel bağlılıkları ve iş tatminleri arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamamıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kurumsal-sosyal-sorumluluk-algisinin-tatmini-orgutsel-baglilik-uzerindeki-etkisi.pdf
  • 1
185
202
  • Turkish

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Adams, J.S. (1963). Toward an Understanding of Inequity, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 422-436.
Bronn, P.S., Vrioni, A.B. & Belliu, A. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility and Cause-Related Marketing: An Overview, International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207-222.
Caldwell, D.F., Chatman, J.A. & O’Reilly, C.A. (1990). Building Organizational Commitment: A Multiform Study, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 245-261.
Carroll, A.B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward The Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct, Business Society, 38(3), 268-295.
Commission of the European Communities. (2002). Communication from the Commission Concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development 347 final.
Davis, K. (1973). The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities, Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312-322.
Davis, K. (1998). İşletmelerde İnsan Davranışı, İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Yayını.
Drummond, H. (2000). Introduction to Organizational Behavior, New York: Oxford University Press.
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Çankırı Karatekin University
İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Journal of The Faculty of Economics
Fakültesi Dergisi and Administrative Sciences
200
Dutton, J., Dukerich, J.M. & Harquail, C. (1994). Organizational Images and Member Identification, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239-263.
Ekin, M. G. & Tezölmez, H. (1999). Business Ethics in Turkey: An Empirical Investigation with Special Emphasis on Gender, Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 17-34.
Erdheim, J., Wang, M. & Zickar, M. (2006). Linking the Big Five Personality Constructs to Organizational Commitment, Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 959-970.
Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, University of Minnesota, London: Pitman Publishing.
Gilder, D., Schuyt, T. & Breedijk, M. (2005). Effects of Employee Volunteering Program on The Work Force: The ABN-AMRO Case, Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 143-153.
Griffin, J. & Mahon, J. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate, Business and Society, 36(1), 5-31.
Herndon, N.C., John, P.F. & Quey-Jen, Y. (2001). An Investigation of Moral Values and the Ethical Content of the Corporate Culture: Taiwanese Versus U.S Sales People, Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 73-85.
Ibrahim, N.A. & Angelidis, J. P. (1995). Effect of Board Members Gender on Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientation, Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(4), 35-40.
Koh, H.C. & Boo, E.H.Y. (2004). Organizational Ethics and Employee Satisfaction and Commitment, Management Decision, 42(5/6), 677-693.
Kotler, P. & Lee, N. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause, Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley & Sons.
Kreitner, R. & Kinicki, A. (2001). Organizational Behavior, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Luthans, F. (1995). Organizational Behavior, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Marz, J. W. (1999). An Examination of The Relationship Between Corporate and Individual Characteristics and Social Orientation, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, School of Business and Entrepreneurship.
A.Tuzcu Bahar/Spring 2014
Cilt 4, Sayı 1, ss.185-202 Volume 4, Issue 1, pp.185-202
201
Marz, J., Powers, T.L. & Queisser, T. (2003). Corporate and Individual Influences on Managers Social Orientation, Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 1-11.
May, T.Y., Korczynski, M. & Frenkel, S.J. (2002). Organizational and Occupational Commitment: Knowledge Workers in Large Companies, Journal of Management Studies, 39(6), 775-801.
McDaniel, C., Schoeps, N. & Lincourt, J. (2001). Organizational Ethics: Perceptions of Employees by Gender, Journal of Business Ethics, 33(3), 245-256.
Meyer, J.P. & Allen, N.J.A. (1999). Three component conceptualization of Organizational Commitment, Human Resource Management Review, 11(1), 61-89.
Moir, L. (2001). What Do We Mean by Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance, 1(2), 16-22.
Morrow, P. (1983). Concept Redundancy in Organizational Research: The Case of Work Commitment, Academy of Management Review, 8, 486-500.
O’Reilley, C.A. & Chatman, J.A. (1986). Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification, and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior, American Psychological Association, 71, 492-499.
Peterson, D.K. (2004). Benefits of Participation in Corporate Volunteer Programs: Employees’ Perceptions, Personnel Review, 33(5/6), 615-627.
Peterson, D.K. (2004). The Relationship Between Perception of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment, Business and Society, 43(3), 296-319.
Peterson, D. (2004). Recruitment Strategies for Encouraging Participation in Corporate Volunteer Programs, Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 371-386.
Preston, L. & O’Bannon, D. (1997). The Corporate Social–Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis” Business and Society, 36(4), 419-429.
Riordan, C.M., Gatewood, R.D. & Barnes, B.J. (1997). Corporate Image: Employee Reactions and Implications for Managing Corporate Social Performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 401-412.
Robbins, S.P. & Coulter, M.C. (2002). Management, 7. Ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Çankırı Karatekin University
İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Journal of The Faculty of Economics
Fakültesi Dergisi and Administrative Sciences
202
Robins, S.P. (2000). Managing Today, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Roman, R., Hayibor, S. & Agle, B. (1999). The Relation Social and Financial Performance, Business and Society, 38(1), 126-131.
Satish, P.D. (1996). The Impact of Ethical Climate Types on Facets of Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 655-660.
Schwartz, M.S. & Carroll, A.B. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach, Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503-530.
Smith, N.C. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How? California Management Review, 45(4), 52-76.
Swailes, S. (2004). Commitment to Change: Profiles of Commitment and in-Role, Performance, Personnel Review, 33(2), 187-204.
Upham, S.P. (2006). A Model for Giving: The Effect of Corporate Charity on Employees, The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 22, 81-90.
Valentine, S., Lynn, G. & Lucero, M. (2002). Ethical Context, Organizational Commitment and Person-Organization Fit, Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 349-360.
Waddock, S. & Graves, S. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link, Strategic Management Journal, 38(4), 303-319.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com