Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ADIM ADIM EKONOMİ OKURYAZARLIĞI: SOSYAL BİLGİLER DERSLERİ İÇİN ALTERNATİF YOLLAR

ECONOMY LITERACY STEP BY STEP: THE ALTERNATIVE WAYS FOR THE SOCIAL STUDIES LESSONS

Journal Name:

  • Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study is to give suggestions increasing the economy literacy levels of the students at the primary school level. The alternative ways were presented to the teachers for the Social Studies lessons by examining the samples in the literature in this direction. This study is in the literature scanning model. Today’s students shall face with more complicated economy subjects while making the decisions that will affect their lives when they became adults. The individuals not literate economically and who are void of applying the economic judgment skills, shall consider the economic problems faced by them when both they were young and also they became adults complicated and threatening. The young people can understand the global economy only when learned the economy subjects and thus they have roles much better in their country’s economic system. Therefore it is quite important for today’s young people to understand how the economy affects the humans’ lives in the triangle of the producer, consumer and good citizen. The activities to be applied by the teachers in the Social Studies lessons while they teach the economy subjects, shall help to the teachers to learn the economy subjects seem hard and complicated in both enjoyable and also permanent ways.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı ilköğretim düzeyinde öğrencilerin ekonomi okuryazarlık düzeylerini arttırıcı önerilerde bulunmaktır. Bu doğrultuda literatürdeki örnekler incelenerek Sosyal Bilgiler dersleri için öğretmenlere alternatif yollar sunulmuştur. Bu çalışma literatür taraması modelindedir. Bugünün öğrencileri, yetişkin bireyler olduklarında hayatlarını etkileyecek kararları alırken daha karmaşık ekonomi konuları ile karşılaşacaklardır. Ekonomi açısından okuryazar olmayan ve ekonomik muhakeme becerilerini uygulamaktan yoksun olan bireyler, hem gençken hem de yetişkin olduklarında karşılaştıkları ekonomi sorunlarını karmaşık ve endişe verici bulacaklardır. Gençler ancak ekonomi konularını öğrendiklerinde küresel ekonomiyi anlayabilirler ve böylece ülkelerinin ekonomik sistemi başarıya ulaşmış olur. Bu nedenle bugünün gençleri için ekonominin üretici, tüketici ve iyi vatandaş üçgeninde insanların yaşamını nasıl etkilediğini anlaması oldukça önemlidir. Sosyal Bilgiler derslerinde öğretmenlerin ekonomi konularını öğretirken uygulayacakları etkinlikler, öğrencilerin zor ve karmaşık görülen ekonomi konularını hem zevkli hem de kalıcı bir şekilde öğrenmelerine yardımcı olacaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-adim-adim-ekonomi-okuryazarligi-sosyal-bilgiler-dersleri-icin-alternatif-yollar.pdf
  • 14
1
36
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Akhan, N. E. (2009). Sosyal Bilgilerde Ekonomi Konularının Öğretimi. Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi. M. Safran (Editör). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Akhan, N. E. (2010). İlköğretim Sosyal Bilgiler Öğrencilerinde Ekonomi Okuryazarlığının Durumu ve Geliştirilmesi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi) Gazi Üniversitesi / Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Nadire Emel AKHAN
Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Yıl: 6, Sayı:14, Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi
Özel Sayısı, 2013
30
Akyol, A. ve Müftüoğlu, N. (1988). Ortaokullar İçin Ticaret Bilgileri ve Uygulaması I. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Gençlik ve Spor Bakanlığı.
Ata, B. (2006). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretim Programı. Hayat Bilgisi ve Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi. C. Öztürk (Editör). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Barr, R., Barth, J. L. & Shermis, S. S. (1978). The Nature Of The Social Studies. California: ETC Publications.
Barth, J. L. ve Demirtaş, A. (1997). İlköğretim Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi. YÖK, Dünya Bankası Milli Eğitim Geliştirme Projesi. Ankara.
Brandt, D. (2009). Literacy and Learning: Reflections on Writing, Reading, and Society. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Branson, M. S. (2005). The Connection Between Civic And Economic Education. Teacher Librarian. 32 (3), 26-28.
Bridge-Mendenhall, M. K. (1994). The Effect of The Stock Market Game on Economic Literacy. Doctorate of Philosophy in Education. Universty of Wyoming.
Brophy, J. & Alleman, J. (2006). Powerful Social Studies for Elementary Students. Thomson/Wadsworth.
Buckles, S. (2001). What Is - And Isn't - Economics Education. Theory Into Practice. 26(3), 163-169.
Burkhardt, G., Monsour, M., Valdez, G., Gunn, C., Dawson, M., Lemke, C., Coughlin, E., Thadani, V. & Martin, C. (2003). EnGauge® 21st Century Skills: Literacy in the Digital Age. California: NCREL -North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Web: <http://www.asbindia.info/asb21/engauge21st.pdf> Erişim tarihi: 17 Nisan 2009.
Cyert, R. M. (1984). Economic Education In Our Schools. Journal of Economic Education. 15(4), 261-264.
Adım Adım Ekonomi Okuryazarlığı: Sosyal Bilgiler Dersleri İçin Alternatif Yollar
Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Yıl: 6, Sayı: 14, Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi
Özel Sayısı,2013
31
Darvin, M. W. (2006). Economics Framework for the 2006 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington: National Assessment Governing Board U.S. Department of Education.
Day, H. R. (1988). Play Dough Economics: Motivating Avtivites for Teachin Economics to Elemenraty and Middle School Students. Indianapolis.
Flowers, B., Morton, J. S. & Schug, M. C. (2002). Financial Fitness for Life, Grades 6–12: Parent's Guide. New York: National Council on Economic Education.
Gerek, S. ve Kurt, A. A. (2007). Ekonomi Okuryazarlığı: Çevrimiçi Ortamın Uygulamada Yaratacağı Değer. The Proceedings of 7 International Educational Technology Conferance. 3–5 May. Near East University. North Cyprus.
Gonzalez, L. M. (2006). Mini- Society for Teachin Economic Concepts and Entrepreneurship to Third Grade Students and Increasing Teacher Knowledge and Confidence. Requiremets for the Degree of Doctor of Education. Corrollton: Georgia.
Graff, E. E. (1982). Economic Reasoning and Decision- Making of Third and Fourth Graders. A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Education. Los Angeles: University of California.
Harap, H. (1935). Economics for Teachers: an Experiment in Cooperative Learning. Social Studies. 26 (3), 163-165.
Hawthorne, S., Rodgers, Y. V. & Wheeler, R. C. (2003). Economic Literacy Among Primary-Grade Students. Williamsburg. Web: <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=433980> Erişim tarihi: 15 Ağustos 2008.
Highsmith, R. (1990). How Do We Stand in High School Economics Today?. Social Education. 54(2), 81-83.
Nadire Emel AKHAN
Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Yıl: 6, Sayı:14, Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi
Özel Sayısı, 2013
32
Johnson, B. C. (1990). A Status Study Of Economic Education In Michigan Elementary Schools. Degree Of Doctor Of Education Department Of Educational Leadership. Michigan: Western Michigan University.
Leet, D. R., Charkins, R. J. & Lang, N. (1998). Personal Decision Making. New York: National Council on Economic Education.
Marks, M. & Kotula, G. (2009). Using The Circular Flow Of Income Model To Teach Economics In The Middle School Classroom. The Social Stuides. 100(5), 233-242.
Martorella, P. H. (1998). Social Studies For Elementary School Children: Developing Young Citizens. (Second Edition). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Mccabe, M, F. (1975). Teachers Guide to Economic Concepts: Grade 4-6. South Dakota: Center for Economic Education.
Miller, S. L. (1988). Economic Education For Citizenship. Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC.
Murphy, S. & Walsh, J. (1989). Economics and the Real-Life Connection. Social Studies And The Young Learner. 2(1), 6–8.
NCSS (National Council for Social Studies) (1994). Expectations For Excellence: Curriculum Standards For Social Studies. Washington, DC: Author.
Parasız, İ. (2006). İktisadın A B C’si. ( Sekizinci Baskı). Bursa: Ezgi Yayıncılık.
Patterson, J. (2002). Slavery Revisited: Using Economics Reasoning to Teach about the Past and Present. The Social Studies. 93(1), 40–43 Web: <http://www4.infotrieve.com/journals/toc_details.asp adresinden> Erişim tarihi: 15 Aralık 2006.
Philbin, M. & Myers, J. (1991). Classroom Drama: Discourse as a Mode of Inquiry in Elementary School Social Studies. Social Studies. 82(5), 179-182.
Adım Adım Ekonomi Okuryazarlığı: Sosyal Bilgiler Dersleri İçin Alternatif Yollar
Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Yıl: 6, Sayı: 14, Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi
Özel Sayısı,2013
33
Preston, R. C. & Herman, W. L. (1974). Teaching Social Studies in The Elemantary School. New York: Holt, Rinehart.
Racich, M. J. (1982). Economic Education In The Elementary Grades: Implementation and Evaluation. A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Education. Illinois State University.
Rivlin, A. M. (1999). On Economic Literacy. The Region. 13 (2), 14-17.
Rodgers, Y. V., Hawthorne, S. & Wheeler, R. C. (2004). Teaching Economics in the Primary Grades: Standards and Strategies. Web: <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=558022> Erişim tarihi: 15 Ağustos 2008.
Schug, M. & Birkey, C. (1985). The Development of Children's Economic Reasoning. Theory and Research in Social Education, 13(1), 31-42.
Schug, M. & Hagedorn, E. A. (2005). The Money Savvy Pig Goes to the Big City: Testing the Effectiveness of an Economics Curriculum for Young Children. The Social Studies. 96(2), 68–71 Web: <http://www4.infotrieve.com/journals/toc_details.asp> adresinden 15 Ağustos 2008’de alınmıştır.
Schug, M. C. (1981). What Educational Research Says About The Development Of Economic Thinking? Theory And Research In Social Education. 9 (3), 25-36.
Schug, M. C. (1986). Economics for Kids: Ideas for Teaching in the Elementary Grades. Washington: National Education Association.
Staubs, M. O. (2007). Economics Education: Attitudes And Practices Of Elementary And Middle Grade Teacher Candidates. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Elementary Education in the Graduate School of the University of Alabama. Alabama: Tuscaloosa.
Nadire Emel AKHAN
Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Yıl: 6, Sayı:14, Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi
Özel Sayısı, 2013
34
Stigler, G. J. (1970). The Case, If Any, for Economic Literacy. The Journal Of Economıc Educatıon. 1(2), 77-84. Web: <http://www.jstor.org/pss/1182314> Erişim tarihi: 12 Ağustos 2008.
Suiter, M. C., Dempsey, J., Pettit, M. A. B. & Reiser, M. L. (2004). Focus: Middle School Economics. New York: National Council on Economic Education.
Turner, T. N. (2004). Essentials of Elementary Social Studies. Boston: Pearson Education.
Webb, S. K. (1997). A Comparative Assessment of Two Distinct Teaching Methods in Economics Education of Twelfth Grade Students at Hoover High School as Measured by Students Scores on Economic Literacy And Economic Attitudes. Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education. The University of Alabama.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com