Buradasınız

PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF STATE-OWNED AND PRIVATELY-OWNED BANKS DURING THE PERIOD 2001-2010 IN TURKEY1

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Turkish banking sector has had a swift recovery after the 2001 crisis that was experienced in Turkey and there has been observed a great increase at assets size of the sector, credits, deposits and net profit. 169 billion TL assets size in 2001 increased to 961 billion TL in 2010. Whereas the net profit was -11 billion TL in 2001, it increased to 21 billion TL in 2010. Using panel regression analysis, this study seeks to determine whether there have been significant differences between the ratios acquired from financial statements of 3 public banks and 11 private banks operating in Turkish banking sector between 2001 and 2010. According to this, it was analyzed whether profitability ratios of the banks that represent a balanced panel feature can be explained in terms of other ratios as a dependent variable or not. Profitability ratios from the dependent variables have been taken into consideration as Net Profit (Loss) / Total Assets (KAR1), Net Profit (Loss) / Shareholder’s Equity (KAR2), Pre-Tax Profit / Total Assets (KAR3). The purpose of this study is to look for an answer to the question “Is there a significant difference between the years 2001 and 2010 for State-Owned and Privately Owned Banks in terms of ratios that explain dependent variables?” Moreover, there has also been revealed whether explanatory variables have differentiated or not. Consequently, according to the balanced panel regression results that have been performed in state-owned banks, ratios that can explain those ratios at 1% significance level when we perform regression analysis to KAR1, KAR2 and KAR3 ratios separately at a fixed effect are: Total Operating Income / Total Assets (FR1) and (Personnel Expense + Severance payment) / Total Assets (FR3) ratios. When this same analysis has been performed to the private sector banks, there has been analyzed that ratios of Shareholder’s Equity / (Deposits + Non-Deposit Resources) (SY3) and Total Deposits / Total assets (BY1) along with the explanatory variables of the state-owned banks can be explained at 1% significance level. Stata 11software was used for the analysis, effect models Hausman test for the panel have been performed. F-test of all models that have been set are significant and explanation rates have shown change.
16
20

REFERENCES

References: 

Scott, J.W and Arias, J.C. (2011), Banking Profitability Determinants, Business
Intelligence Journal, Vol.4 No.2, July, 209, pp. 209-230
Gul, S.; Irshad, F and Zaman K. (2011), Factors Affecting Bank Profitability in
Pakistan, The Romanian Economic Journal, XIV, No: 39, pp. 61-86
Miller, S. M., and Noulas, A. G. (1997). Portfolio mix and large-bank
profitability in the USA. Applied Economics, 24 (4), 505 — 512.
Ali, K., Akhtar, M. F., and Ahmed, H. Z. (2011). Bank-Specific and
Macroeconomic Indicators of Profitability - Empirical Evidence from the
Commercial Banks of Pakistan. "International Journal of Business and
Social Science", 2(6), 235-242.
Sufian, F. (2011), Profitability of Korean Banking Sector: Panel Evidence on
Bank-Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants”, Journal of Economics
and Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp.43-72
Kaplan, M and Çelik M (2008), “The Persistence of Profitability And
Competition in The Turkish Banking Sector”, Erciyes University, İktisafi
ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Vol:30, pp.157-167
Chantapong, S. (2005), “Comparative Study of Domestic and Foreign Bank
Performance in Thailand: The Regression Analysis”, Economic Change
and Restructuring, vol:38, pp.63-83
Sufian, F. And M.S. Habibullah (2009), “Bank Specific And Macroeconomic
Deteterminants of Bank Profitability: Emprical Evidence from China
Banking Sector”, Frontiers of Economics in China, 4, pp.274-291

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com