Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

İKTİSADİ BÜYÜMEDE KURUMSAL FAKTÖRLER VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM

INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE IN THE ECONOMIC GROWTH

Journal Name:

  • Akademik Bakış

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Aim of the study is to expose the effect of institutions and institutional structure on economic growth to realize which institutional instruments. Institutions have important effect of the economic performance in different way. First of all, Institutions reduce uncertainty by providing the structure to everyday life. In addition, Institutions influencing operation cost by decreasing uncertainty, directing economic activities towards productive fields. Second important matter is the effect of the political regime, government intervention and property rights protection on the economic performance. However institutions variables worldwide. Consequently this argument can be used to explain the level of growth differences
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, kurumların ve kurumsal yapının iktisadi büyüme üzerindeki etkinsinin hangi kurumsal araçlarla gerçekleştiğini ortaya koymaya çalışmaktır. Kurumlar birçok yolla ekonomik performans üzerinde önemli etkilerde bulunur. Bunlardan ilki kurumların belirsizliği azaltarak gündelik hayatı bir yapıya kavuşturmasıdır. Ayrıca kurumlar belirsizliği azaltıp işlem maliyeti üzerinde etkili olarak iktisadi faaliyetlerin üretken alanlara yönelmesini sağlamaktadır. İkinci önemli nokta ise politik rejimlerin, devletin piyasaya müdahalesinin ve mülkiyet haklarının korunması gibi kurumsal vasıtaların iktisadi performans üzerindeki etkisidir. Ancak kurumlar dünya genelinde çeşitlilik göstermektedir. Bu farklılık ise ülkelerin neden farklı büyüme performansları gerçekleştirdiğini açıklayıcı bir argüman olarak kullanılmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-iktisadi-buyumede-kurumsal-faktorler-kurumsal-degisim.pdf
  • 19
1-24
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

ACEMOĞLU, Daron, (2003), “Root Causes. A historical approach to assessing the role of
institutions in economic development” Finance and Developments, (June, 2003), s27-30
ACEMOĞLU D, JOHNSON, S., ROBİNSON, J.A (2001), “The Colonial Origins of
Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation” American Economic Review, 91,
2001, s.1369-1401
AKERLOF, G.A., (1970), “The Market For Lemons: Quality Uncertainty an the Market
Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500
ALCHIAN,A. “Mülkiyet Hakları İktisadına Giriş” Çev. Rasim Kutlu, Devlet, Mülkiyet ve
İktisat içinde (Mart, 2000),s197-220
COLARES, J. F. (1998), “Coase, Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond: Where the New
Institutional Economics Meets Law and Economics,” CAEN Working Paper Series, no.
208.
DEMİR, Ömer (1996), Kurumcu İktisat, Ankara: Vadi Yayınları.
HAYEK, F.A.(1999) Kölelik Yolu., Çev: T.Feyzioğlu&,Y.Arslan, Ankara: Liberte Yayınları
HERMAN Van Der Wee, (1975), Reviewed Work(s): The Rise of the Western World: A New
Economic History by Douglass C. North; Robert Paul Thomas The Business History
Review, Vol. 49, No. 2. (Summer, 1975), pp. 237-239
HODGSON, Geoffrey, (1998), “The Approach of Institutional Economics,” Journal of
Economic Literature, vol. 36, Issue 1, s.166-192
İZMEN, Ü., FİLİZTEKİN, A.,YILMAZ, K., ( 2005), “Türkiyede Büyüme Perspektifi: Makro
Ekonomi Çerçeve Dinamikler/ Strateji”, TUSİAD Dergisi No:1 (2005, Haziran)
NORTH, Douglass C., (2002), Kurumlar, Kurumsal Değişim ve Ekonomik Performans,
İstanbul: Sabancı Üniversitesi Yayınları
NORTH, Douglas C, (1997),“The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics to and
Understanding of the Transition Problem” UNU/WIDER (March, 1997) Annual Lecture1.
ÖZVEREN, Eyüp, (2005) Kurumsalcı İktisat, Ankara: İmge Yayınları
PARADA, Jario J. (2001), “Original Instıtutional Economics: A theory for the 21st century,”
Oeconomicus Fall, s. 46-60
PARADA, Jairo J., (2002), “Original Institutional Economics and New Institutional
Economics: Revisiting the Bridges (Or the Divide)”, Oeconomicus, Volume VI, Fall 2002
s. 43-61
POSNER, Richard A.,(1993), “The New Institutional Economics Meets Law and
Economics,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149 (1): s. 73-87
RODRIK, Dani, (2000), "Institutions For High-Quality Growth: What They Are And How
To Acquire Them," NBER Working paper 7540.
RODRIK, Dani, (2003),”The Primacy of Institutions (and what this does and does not
mean)”, Finance and Developments, (June, 2003), s.31-34
RODRIK, Dani, (1999), “Where Did All the Growth Go?” NBER Working Paper No.W6350
SAMUELS, Warren J., (1991), “Kurumsal İktisat”, Çev: İstiklal Yasar Vural ve Abdülkerim
Çalışkan. (http://www.canaktan.org/ekonomi/anayasal_iktisat/diger_yazilar/vuralkuru....
pdf) Erişim Tarihi: 24.06.2008
SHLEIFER, Andrei; VISHNY, ROBERT, W., (1993), “Corruption” The Quarterly Journal of
Economics, Vol. 108, No. 3. (Aug., 1993), s. 599-617
WOLFGANG, Kasper and MANFRED E. Streit, (1998), “Institutional Economics, Social
Order and Public Policy”, The Locke Institute, Cheltenham; Edward Elgar, s.27-91

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com