Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

TÜRKİYE’DE TARIM EMTİA FUTURES FİYATLAMASI VE MARJİN BELİRLENMESİ

PRICING AND MARGINING OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY FUTURES: THE CASE OF TURKEY

Journal Name:

  • Akademik Bakış

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The price of some agricultural products are volatile in Turkey. Commodity futures can be used to avoid volatility. With the use of simple pricing and margining, commodity futures can be recognised and more commonly preferred. On the other hand some cities are focused on the production of some certain agricultural products. Somehow, these cities can own a commodity exchange market and a futures clearinghouse. The synergy which is expected to arise between these institutions can support the improvement of agriculture.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Türkiye’de bazıtarım ürünlerinin fiyatlarıoldukça volatildir. Emtia futures volatiliteden kaçınmak için kullanılabilir. Basit fiyatlama ve marjin belirleme yöntemleri ile, emtia futures daha fazla tanınabilir ve daha fazla tercih edilebilir. Diğer taraftan bazı şehirler belirli tarım ürünlerinin üretiminde uzmanlaşmışlardır. Bu şehirler bir ticaret borsasına ve futures borsasına sahip olabilirler. Bu iki kurum arasında ortaya çıkmasıbeklenen sinerji, tarımın gelişmesine destek olabilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-turkiyede-tarim-emtia-futures-fiyatlamasi-marjin-belirlenmesi.pdf
  • 35
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

AMIN, K.I. ve JARROW, R.A. (1991) “Pricing foreign currency options under stochastic interest
rates”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 10, pp. 310 – 329.
ASAY, M.R. (1982) “A note on the design of commodity option contracts”, Journal of Futures
Markets, 52, pp. 1–7.
BLACK, F. (1976) “The pricing of commodity contracts”, Journal of Financial Economics,3, pp.
167–179.
AKADEMİK BAKIŞ DERGİSİ
Sayı: 35 Mart – Nisan 2013
UluslararasıHakemli Sosyal Bilimler E-Dergisi
ISSN:1694-528X İktisat ve Girişimcilik Üniversitesi, Türk Dünyası
Kırgız – Türk Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Celalabat – KIRGIZİSTAN
http://www.akademikbakis.org
 
6 
 
BRENNER, R.J. ve KRONER, K.F. (1995) “Arbitrage, cointegration and testing the unbiasedness
hypothesis in financial markets”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Anal, 30, pp. 23 - 42.
BROWN, C.A. ve TAYLOR, S. D. (1997) “A test of the Asay model for pricing options on the SPI
futures contract”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 5, pp. 579–594
DENİZ, Esma (2009) Fındık Sektör raporu, Avrupa işletmeler ağı.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2010) www.fao.org.
HEATH, D., JARROW, R. A. ve MORTON, A. (1992) “Bond pricing and the term structure of
interest rates: A new methodology for contingent claims valuation”, Econometrica, 60, pp. 77-105.
LIEU, D., (1990) “Option pricing with futures-style margining”, Journal of Futures Markets, 10,
pp. 327–338.
HIROSE, Takehide, KATO, Hideaki Kiyoshi ve BREMER, Marc (2009) “Can margin traders predict
future stock returns in Japan?”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,17, pp. 41–57.
SEQUEIRA, John M., MCALEERA, Michael ve CHOW, Ying-Foon (1999) “Estimation of
alternative pricing models for currency futures contracts”, Mathematics and Computers in
Simulation, 48, pp. 519-530.
SHANKER, Latha ve BALAKRISHNAN, Narayanaswamy (2006) “Price limits and capital
requirements of futures clearinghouses”, European Journal of Operational Research,168, pp.
281–290.
SUBAŞI, Birgül (2004) Kestane Sektör Profili, İstanbul ticaret odasıEtüt ve Araştırma Şubesi.
TÜİK (2010) Bölgesel göstergeler TRB1 Malatya, Elazığ, Bingöl, Tunceli, 2009”, Ankara.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com