Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

SÜT ÖN DİŞLER ÎÇİN İNDÎREKT YÖNTEMLE HAZIRLANAN KURONLARIN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

THE COMPARISON OF CKOWNS PREPARED WITH INDIRECTMKTHOD FOR PRIMARY ANTERIOR TEETH

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2000

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of our study was to compare the in vitro tensile strength and shear strength, of crowns prepared with indirect method in dental laboratory for the restoration ol _ I »«.I k n.-ıricın-j* M. hlı-h i o sı hvhiTil composite resin, and Definite OMC, which is an ormocer, were used in order to prepare the crowns. Tensile strength and shear strength of the crowns prepared were determined by using Hounsficld testing machine. As a result of the tensile strength test, it was found that Charisma Indirect Crowns group has lower strength than Delimle Indirect Crowns group , but th^re was no statistically differences among the groups (P>0,05), As a result of the shear strength test, it was found that. Charisma Indirect Crowns group was stronger than Definite Indirect Crowns group. However, the differences among the groups were not. significant statistically These crowns easily prepared in laboratory facilities may be preferred in the restorations of primary anterior teeth, while the bitting fortes of children are considcred.too.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çalışmamızın amacı, silt ön dişlerin restorasyonunda kullanılmak üzere laboratuvar ortamında indirekt yöntemle 1.., ..^1.-. l'i.PAvıl.ınr İTI ıritr-f,, jılnr.jlt ,-jıl-Ti-ip- ı-r- hacı iv M V:-IT-.I ııtu.ıı ııııım. nuı ujııuıııı ııı 'mu S""-1 ' V- dirençlcrini karşılaştırmaktır. Kuronların hazırlanmasında, bir hibrid kompozit reçine olan Charisma ve bir ormoser olan Definite OMC materyalleri kullanılmıştır. Hazırlanan kurumların, çekme ve basınca kargı dirençleri Houusl'idd tensometresi kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Çekme testi sonucunda Definite İndirekt Kuron grubu Charisma İndirekt Kuron grubundan daha zayıf bulunmuştur. Takat gruplar anısında istatistiksel olarak farklılık gözlenmemiştir (P>0,05)- Basınç testi sort ucunda ise, Charisma İndirekt Kuron grubu Definite İndirekt Kuron grubundan daha güçlü bulunmuştur. Bununla birlikLe. aralarındaki farklılık istatistiksel olarak önemsizdir (IV0.05). Laboratuvar ortamında kolaylıkla hazırlanabildi bu kuronlar, çocukların ısırma kuvvetleri dc göz önüne alındığında süt ön diş restorasyonlarında tercih edilebilirler.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-sut-disler-icin-indirekt-yontemle-hazirlanan-kuronlarin-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 2
1-6
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Andreaus SB. Liquid versus Gel Etchants on Glass fonomers: "their EffccLs on Surface Morphology and Shear Bond Strengths to Composite Resins. JADA 1987;114:137-158.
2. Baker LH, Moon P, Mourino AP. Retention of Hsihetic Veneers on Primary Stainless Steel Crowns. ASDC 1996;63:185-189.
3. Bakke M, Holm B, Jensen BL, Michler L, Möllcr R. Unilateral, Isometric Bite Force in 8-68-ycar-o!d Women and Men Related to Occlusal Factors. Scand J Dent Res 1990,98:149-158.
4.
Balırbavgi
l Y, Korten G, Kayalı bay H- Süt Ön Diş Restorasyonlarında Polikarbonat Kuronların Kullanımı. Hacettepe Üniv. Diş Hck.Fak.Dcrg. 1985;9:181-189.
5. Burke FJT, Watts DC Wilson NHF, Wilson MA. Current Status and Rationale for Composite Inlays and Onlays. Br Dent J 1991;170:269-273.
6 Carrel R, TanziJli R. A Veneering Resin tor Stainless Steel Crowns. J Pedod 1989:14:41 -44.
7. Craig RG. Restorative Dcntaf Materials, fiffi ed. St Ixmis: CV Mosby Co.l980;60-62.
8. Croll IP. Primary Canine Full Coronal Restoration: New Considerations. Quintessence lilt 1985;2:143-147.
9. Croll FP. Bonded Composite Resin Crowns for Primary Incisors: Technique Update Quintessence Int 1990;21:153-157.
10- Croll TP, rfelpili ML. Preformed Resin-Veneered Stainless Steel Crowns for Restoration ol" l-Yimary Incisors. Quintessence hit 1996;27:309-313.
11 Grosso EC. Primarv Anterior Strip Crowns: A New Approach. J Pedod 1987:1 1:182-186.
12. Hartmann CR. The Open-Face Stainless Steel Crown: An Esthetic Technique. ASDC 1983;50:31-33.
13. Helpin ML. The Open-Face Crown Restoration in Chi I dren. ASDC 1983 ;50:34-38.
14. Hickcl R, Dasch W, Janda R, Tyas M,
Amisaviee K. New Restorative Materials. Int Dent J 1998;48:3-16.
15. Hinoura K. Moore BK. Phillips RW. Tensile Bond Strength Between Glass lonomer Cements and Composite Resins, JADA 1987:114:167-172.
16 Huphrev WP. Uses of Chrome Steel in Childrems Dentistry. Dent Surv 1950;26:945-949.
17. Jcdryehowski JR. Restoration of Primary Incisors: An "Open-Face Band Technique. ASDC 1974;41:28-29.
18. Kopel HM. Beaver HA. Comprehensive Restorative Procedures for Primary Anteriore. ASDC 1967;34:412-423.
19. Luke LS, Rcisbick MH. Polycarbonate Crowns. In: Stewart RE, Barber I K, Troulnıan KC, Wei SHY, cds. Pediatric Dentistry. St Louis: CV.Mosby. 1982:894-898.
20. McCabc JE. Applied Dental Materials 7th ed.Giza, KgvptMass Publishing Co. 1994:66-70, 145-156, 157-172.
21. Mink JR. Hill CJ. Crowns for Anterior Primary Teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1973:17:85-92.
22. Mount GJ. An Atlas ol" Glass Tonoraer Cements, A Clinidam's Guide 2nd ed. London: Martin Dunitz. 1994; I-42,76-93.
23. Myers DR. A Modified Technique for The Rcstoralion of Primaiy İnci son with Polycarbonate Crowns. JADA 1975;90:989-991L
24. Pollard MA, Curzon J A. Fcnlon WL. Restoration of Decayed IMmarv Incisors Using Strip Crowns. Dent Update 1991:18:150-152.
25. l*roffit WR, Fields HW. Occlusal Forces in Normal- and Ixjng-facc Children. J Dent Res 1983;62:571-574.
26. Proffit WR. Moray U, Case JC. Evaluation of Vertical Occlusal Force in Normal and Long Face Children. J Dent Res 1982;6I:342 (ffl472).
27. Salama ES. El-Mallakh BF. An Jn Vitro Comparison of Four Surface Preparation Techniques for Venccrini> a Compomer to Stainless Steel. Pediat Dent 1997;19:267-272.
5
Atatürk tiniv.Diş Ilek.Fak.Dcrg. Cilt: 10, Sayıt2, Sayfa: I-6, 200<)
KIRZIOĞLU, YILMAZ
28. Sherman G, Bugg JL„ Carmtlı KR Restoration of Primary Ineiiors with Acrylic Jacket Crnwns-Ojie Appointment Procedure, ASDC 1966;33:182-185.
29. I siimlsdurİK A. White GF, Ficarclîi J. Eine Vcrbcsscrtc Methods, Pol yfearbonal kronen auf Mildizahnen zu zerncnticren. Die Quinlessen;'. 1977;3:149-152.
30. Waggoner WF, Cûhen H. Failure Strength of Four Veneered Primarv Stainless Steel Crowns. Pediat Dent 1995,17:36-40.
31. Webber DL, Epstein MB, Wong .IW, TKîmtSOLlriü A. A Method of Restoring Primarv Anterior Teeth with The Aid of A Celluloid Crown Form and Composite Resins. Pedis t Dent 1979;1:244-246.
32. Weiss AI. A Composite Gown Technique for Primary Anterior Teeth. Quintessence Int 1979;6:53-57.
33. Wendt SL. The effect of Heat Used As A Secondary Cure Upon The Physical Properties of Three Composite Resins. I. Dianetral Tensile SLrenjjlh, Compressive Strength, and Marginal Dimensional Stability. Qinlessence Int 1987; 18:265-271.
34. Wilson II,
Üçtaşl
ı S. Dcntnl Kompozıtlerde Kırılma Dayanıklılığı. Ankara Ünıv, Diş llck.Fak.Derg.
1990;17:233-237.
35.
Zaimoğl
u A, Can O, Ersoy AE._ Diş Hekimlisinde Maddeler Bilgisi. Ankara: Ankara Ünîv. Basımevi 1993:225-229,305-354.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com