3. Akkayan H, Canikoglu B. Resistance ta fracture of crowned tecili restored with different post systems. Eur J ProsthodoriL tics Dent ]99Stf: I3-] 8.
2. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomcclianieal consideration in restoring enodontically treated teetlı. J Pioslhet Dent 1994.71:565-67. Krastca K. Clinical application of a fiber reinforced post system. J Endodon 2001:27:132-3.
3. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK. Dcutsch AS, Musi kant HI,. Fracture strength of three core restorative materials supported with or without a prefabricated splint-shsink post, J Proslhel Dent 1997;7S;560-5.
4 Dean JP, Jeansonne BG. In vitro evaluation of a carbon fiLicr post. J Fndodon 1 WB;24:807-10.
5. Duncan JP, Pamcijcr CM. Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with S!\ luting agents; An ill vitro study. ,1 Proslhet Dent 1998,80:423.
6. Hemandes AS. Dessai GS. Factors allectmg the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:355-363.
79
Atatürk ı '.m Diş Hek.FakDerg. C1l:l3, Sayıtl. Sayfa:72-K0,2003
ÇAKMAKÇI OĞLU, AK'l BPE
7. Freilich MA, Meiers JC Duncan JP.Goldberg A.I. Fibcr-rciıılorced composites in clinical dentistry. Quintessence 2000:63-70.
8- Gutnıan, J. I- : The dentin root coiTiplc.vAıtatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J. Proslhet. Dcnt. 67:448-467,192
9. Halpcrn BC.5. Restorative Dentistry Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:367-90.
10. Heifer ,H. R. ve ark: Determination ol the moisture content ül" vital mid pulpiest Mh. Oral sur. Oral Med. ,34:661-70.1972
11. Hochinan N, Zalkind M. New itil ceramic indirect pout and core system..I Proslhet Dent I999;81 ;65.
12. Mudis SI. Goldstein CR Restoration ol" endodontically treated tcettva review of the literature. J Proslhet Dem 1986,55:33-30.
I 3. Johnson, J. K. , Sclivvarc, N. L. : Kvaluation and restoration of endodontically trentcd |X5slerior teeth. J. Am. Dent- Assoc. ,93:597-605 J 976
14. Krastea K- Clinical application of a fiber reinforced post system. J Hndodon 2001 ;27:132-3.
15. Mannocci h, Ferrari M. Watson IT. [iitcrmiuenl loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon quart/ fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. .1 Adhesive Dent 1999;2:153.
16. Martinc/.-lnsua A, Da Silva L, Rilo B. San tana
l.J. Comparison of the fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthel Dent 1998;80:527-32.
17. McArdle BF Hnhaneing the retention of prefabricated metal posts and res in cores. J ADA 2000;131:1470-71.
IS. Men dom DB. Ffl'ecl of the dentinal bonded resin post-core preparations on resistance to vertical root fracture. .T Proslhet Dent 1992;67:768-72.
19. Mendoza DB, Hakle WS. Retention ol" posts, cemented with various dentinal bonding cements. J Proslhet Dent 1994:72:591-4.
20. Mor.sano SM. Mi Kit P. Clinical .success of cast metal post and coes. .1 Prosthet Dent I993;69:1 1-16.
21. MüJİkant RL, Deutsch AS. A new prefabricated post and core system. J Prothci Dent 1984:52:631-34.
22. Rosen,H. : Operative procedures on muliiluted endodontically treated teeth. I. Prosthet. Dent. ,11:972-86,1961
23. Rostnmtl M, Filrcr C, Behr M, Lant; R, Handel Cr. Comparison of in vilro fracture strength ol" metallic and looth coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:59-5.
24. Rosin MSplielh C. Wilkcns M, Meyer G. ['.I I eel of cement type on retention of a tapered post with a sell cuthng double thread. J of Dentistry 2000;2S:577.
25. Shilingburg HI. Fundamentals of Fi.xed Prsthodonlics
26. Tropc.M. . vc ark: Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. F.ndodont- Dent. "I'ranmatol. .1:108-1 1 1.1985
27. Zalkind M, Hochman N. Esthetic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores. .1 Prosthet Dctil 1998:79:702.
28. Zalkınd M. Shkury S. Stern N, Hclmg 1. Kffeet of prefabricated metal post head design on the retention o various core materials. .1 Oral Rchabil 2000:27:483-87.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com