Journal Name:
- Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi
Publication Year:
- 2003
Keywords (Original Language):
Author Name | University of Author | Faculty of Author |
---|---|---|
- 1
- Turkish
REFERENCES
I. WILSON A.D., KENT B. h. A New Translucent Cement for Dentistry. Br. Dent, J. 1972, 15: 133-135.
ÇKLKBİ
2,
ZAİM0-3L
U A. , CAN G., F.RSOY H„ AKSU L. Diş Hekimliğinde Maddeler Bilgisi. Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Yayınları. 1993: 305-344.
3- QILO G. Luting Cements, Int. I3enL. .1. 1991; 41:
81-88.
4 DTAZ-ARNOLD A. M. Current Status of Luting Agents For Fixed Pruslhodontics. J. Frasihet. Dent.1999; 81: 135-141.
5. GRAHAM J. M, Glass lonomer Cements: Past, Present and Future, Oper. Dent. 1994; 19: 82-90.
6. MC CABE J- F.. WALLS A.W.G. Applied Dental Materials. London Hlaekuell Science Ltd. 5. Edition. 1998: 202-211.
7. M FRY ON S.D., STEPHFNS P,G.V BROWN F R.M- A Comparison of the in ViLro Cytotoxicity of Two Glass lonomer Cements. J. Dent. 1983; 62: 769-73. 8-YAVUZYILMAZ IF Metal Destekli Estetik (Veneer KaplamuJ Kronlar. Ankara, Gazi Üniversitesi iletişim Fakültesi Basımevi 1.Baskı.1996: 247-2:52.
9. SMITH D.C.. WILLIAMS D.F. Biocompatibility of Dental Materials. Florida. CRC Fress. Volume 2.1982: 143-173.
10. CFFAL Y.D.F.G.. S FA B RAB .G.M. FITeetWeness ol Surface Protection of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements Evaluated Spectrophotometries!}. Opcr. Dent. 2001; 26.401-405.
11. ZEGI1BROHCK L.V. : Cements. J. Estlicl. Dent. 1994; 7: 49-58.
m
r--!-. « ı^> n i" nı ı :K' 11; i nrm;L"TiC r \X
\jL. t^1»I IV U ., VJI IJ r.1 I jl^i HJ.,I\JIIIİ1\.1J. 1TJ..
Dental Materials, St. Louis. Meshy Year Book Inc. 5. Edition. 1992:126 143.
13. SMITH CD. Composition and Characleristicts of Glass lonomer Cements. J. AmDejit Assoc.1990; 120:19-22.
14. BERG -LH. The Continuum of Restorative Materials in Pediatric Dcn!istry-a Review for The Clinician. Pcdiatr Dent.1998: 20: 93-100.
I.T. LEE C-Q- Kva.1 nation of Glass lonomer as an Endodontic Sealant. J. Endodont. 1997; 23: 209-212.
91
Atatürk Üniv.Diş Hek.Fak.Dcrg. CİİUİ3, Sayırl, Sayfa:88-9:L 2003
ÇELEBİ
16. BARNES D.M., BLANK L.W.,GINGELL J.C. A Clinical Evaluation of A Resin Modified Glass lonomer Restorative Material. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1995:126: 1243-1255.
17. NOORT V. N. Denial Materials. London. Mosby Year Book Inc. London 1994: 106-135.
IS. MOUNT G..T. Clinical Placement of Modem Glass lonomer Cements. Quintessence Int.1993; 24: 99-106,
19. SETCHELL, DX, TEO. J.K., KHUN, A.T.: The Relative Solubilities of Four Modern Glass lonomer Cements. Br. Dent. J., 158, 220-222. (1985).
20. A YAD M.F., ROSFJM STILL S.F., WOFXFFX J.B The Effect of Recemantation on Crown Retention. Jnt. J.ProstbeT,1998; 11: 177-82.
21. ASHCRAFT D FL. STALFY R.N., JAKOBSEN J.R. Fluoride Release and Shear Bond Strenghls of Three Light-Cured Glass lonomer Cements. Am. J. Orlhod. Dentotae. Orthop. 1997; 1 11: 260-265.
22. SVANBERG M., MJOR I.A., QRSTAVIK Ü. Mutatis Streptococci in Plaque from Margins of Amalgam. Composite and Glass lonomer Restorations. J. Dent. Res.]989; 69: 861-864.
23. PARK S.H.. KIM K.Y. The Antikariogcnic FITccl of Fluoride in Primer. Bonding Agent and Composite Resin in the Cavosurfaee Enamel Area. Oper.Dent. 1997; 22: 115-120.
24. FORSS H., JOKINEN X SPETS -HAPPONEN S.S.. SEPPA L.. LIPOMA H. Fluoride and Mutans Streptococci in Plaque Grown on Glass lonomer and Composite. Caries Res. 1991; 25: 454-458.
25. RHZK-LHGA F., OGAARD B., ROLLA G Availability of Huoride from Glass lonomer Luting Cements in Human Saliva. Scand. J. Den Rcs.1990; 99: 60-63.
26. BFNDFRLt Y., HA I TON P., DAUGLAS I.
Çeşitli Cam İyonomer Simanların Fluorid Serbestleme ve Antibakteriyel Özellikleri Arasındaki Korelasyonun Değerlendirilmesi, H. Ü. Dışlıek. Der. 1999; 23: 12-17.
27. GLADYS S.. MEERBEEK B.V., BRAEM M., LAMBRECHTS P., VANHERLE G. Comparative Plıy s i co-Mechanical Characterization of New Hybrid Restorative Materials with Conventional Glass lonomer and Resin Composite Restorative Materials. J. Dent. Res.1997: 76: S83-S94.
28. REYTO R. Laser Tooth Whitening. Esther, Dcnt l99S;42: 755.
29. GFB AX, I.FXOUP G, WKRNER A, VREVER J-. DAVTDSON C.L- Structural Integrity of' Resin Modified Glass lonomers as Affected by the Delay or Ommision of LighL Activation- J. Fslhet. Dent. 1998; 77: 5658 1663.
30. MITCHELL C.A., DOUGLAS W.H., CHENG Y.S. Fracture Thougiicss of Conventional. Resin Modified Glass lonomer and Composite Lutjng Cements. Dent. Mater.1999; 15:7-13.
31. BELL R.B., BARKMEIER W.W, Glass lonomer Restoratives and Liners. J. Esther Dent.1994; 6; 129-134.
32. CROIX T.P., KILLTAN CM.. HF.IPIN MX. A Restorative Dentistrv Renaissance for Children. Light-Hardened Glass lonomer/Resin ("emenL. .1. Dent. Child. 1993: March-April: 89 94.
33. LEEVAfLOJ C. PLATT J.A.. COCHRAN M.A. In Vitro Study of Fracture Incidence and Compressive Fracture Load-off all Ceramic Crowns Cemented with Resin Modified Glass lonomer and other Luting Agents. .1. PiostheL Dent. I 998; 80: 699-707.
34. KLRBY R.E., KNOB LOCH L.. THAKUR A. Slrenght Properties of Visible-Light-Curcd Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements . Opcr. DcnU 997: 22: 79-83.
35. ATTIN T.. VATASCHKI M., I İKİ XWIG E. Properties ol Resin Modified Glass lonomer Restorative Materials and Two Polyaeid Modified Resin Composite Materials, Quintessence Int. 1996; 27: 203-209.
36. SMALES R.J., KOUSTIKAS T. Occlusal Wear of Rcsm lonomer Restorative Materials. A List Dent. .L1995; 40: 171-172.
92
Atatürk Üniv.Diş Hek.Fak.Derg. ÇELEBİ Cilt:l3. Sayı:L Sayfa:88-95,2003
37. CHO E., KOPFL H., WHITE S.N. Moisture Susceptibility of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Materials. Quintessence InU995; 26:351-358.
38. LIM C.C., MEO J., YAPA. The Influence of Finishing Time on the Marginal Seal of a Resin Modified Glass lonomer and Polyacid Modified Resin Composite. J. Oral Rchabil.1999; 26: 48-52.
39. FRIELD K.H.. POWERS P.M., H1LLER K.A. Influence of Different Factors on Bond Strenght of Hybrid lonomers. Oper. Dent.l995;20i 74-80.
40. VAIKUNTAM .1. Resin Modilied Glass lonomer Cements : Implications for Use in Pediatric Dentistry. J. Dent. Child. 1997; March-April: 131-134.
41. FKANKEL N., PHARSON GJ., LABEL!.A R. Long-term Strenght of Aesthetics Restoratives. .1. Oral Rchabil.l998;25: 89-93.
42. KNOBLOCH L.A, KERBY F.R., SEGHI R., BERLIN J.S., LhK J.S. Fracture Toughness of Resin-Based Luting Cements. J. Proslhet. Dent. 2000; 83: 204-209.
43. FOLKESSON U.H., ANDFRSSON I.E., VAK-DÜKEN JW.V. Resin ModiFed Glass lonomer Cement Restorations in Primary Molars. Swcd. Dent. 1999; 1-9
44- BURGESS 1, NOR LING B., SUBMIT! J. Resin lonomer Restorative Materials: The New Generation. J.Esthel- Denl.1994; 6: 207-215.
45- BOUISCHL1CHKR M.R., VARGAS M.A., DENEHY G-H. Effect of Desiccation on Microleakage of Five Class 5 Restorative Materials. Oper. Dent.1996; 2J: 90-95
46. KANCHANAVASITA W., PEARSON GJ , ANSTICE H.M. Factors Contributing to the Temperature Rise During Polymerization of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements. Biomaterials.1996; 17; 2305-2312.
47. FRrCKER J.P. A New Self-Curing Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cement for the Direct Bonding of Orthodontias Brackets in Vivo. Am. .1. Orthot. Dcntofacial Orthop.1998; I! 3: 384-386.
48. CA't TANI-LORENTF M.A., DUPUIS V., MOYA F.. PA YAN J„ MEYFR J.M. Competitive Study of the Pysical Properties of the Polyacid Modified Glass lonomer Cement Dent. Mater.1999; 15: 21-32.
49. YAP A.U..L, QUEK C.E.Y., KAU C.H. Repair of New-Generation Tooth-Colored Restoratives: Methods of Surface Conditioning to Achieve Bonding. Oper,Dcnl.l998;23: 173-178.
50. BOILLAGÜET S., ASSAF Y.. VIRG1LL1TO M.. JACQIiEZ H., MEYER J.M. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Resin-Reinforced Glass lonomer Cement. Acta Vied. Dcnt-1998; 4:14-19.
51 UNO S., FINGER WJ„ FRITZ U. Long Term Characteristics of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Restorative Materials. Dent. Mater. 1996; 12: 64-69.
52. ATTIN T., BUCHALLA W., HELLWIG E. Influence of Enamel Conditioning on Bond Strenght ol Resin Modified GlaiS lonomer Restorative Materials and Polyacid Modified Composites. J. IVosthct. Dent. 1996; 76: 29-33.
53. MIYAZAK1 M., MOORE B.K., ONOSE IT. Effect of Surface Coatings on Flexural Properties of Glass lonomers. Hur. J. Oral Sci.l 196; 104: 600-604.
54. DUNCAN J.P., PAMEUER C.H. Retention of Parallel-Sided Titanium Posts Cemented with Six Luting Agents: An in Vitro Study. J. Prostfiet Dent.1998; 80: 423-428.
55. MIYAZAKI M.( IWASAKI K., SOYAMÜRA T-. ONOSE H., MOORE B.K. Resin Modified Glass lonomers: Dentin Bond Strength Versus l ime. Oper. Dent.1998: 23. 144-149. 5G. FEREIRA P.N.R., YAMADA T.; INOKOSHI S.. BURROW M.F., SANO IT. TAGAMI J. Adhesion of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements Using Resin Bonding Systems. J. Dent.1998; 26: 479-485.
57. RUSZ J.E., ANTONUCCI J.M.. EICHMILLRR F.v ANDERSON M.H. Adhesive Properties of Modified Glass lonomer Cements. Dent. Mater. I 992; 8: 31-36.
58. MORAND J.M., JONAS P. Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cement Restoration of Posterior Teeth With lYoximal Carious Lesions. Oper. Dcnt.1995; 26: 389-394
93
Atatürk Üniv.Diş Hek.Fak.Der£;. Cilt: 13. Sayul, Sayf&:88-95, 2003
ÇELEBİ
59.
CHIRISHENS
E G.J. Glass lonomer Resin: A Maturing OonccpL J. Am. Denl. Assoc.1993; 124: 248-249.
60.
SAYGİL
İ G. Rc/in-Modifiye Cam-İyoııomer ve Pol i asi t-Modifiye Kompozit Simanların Klinik Kullanımları. H. 0. Dişhek. Der.1998; 1:26-31.
61. U Z.C., WHITE S.N. Mechanical Properties ol" Dental Luting Cements. J. Prosthet. Dent.1999; SI: 597-609.
62. LI J., LTTJ Y., SORLMARK R.: Flexure Strenght of Resin Modilied Glass lonomer Cements and their Bond SLrengt to Dental Composites. Acta Odontol. Scund.1996: 54: 55-58. 63. 1NOKOSHİ S., BURROW M.F.. KATAÜM1 M ..YAMADA T..TAKAT5U T Opacity ™d Color Changes of Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials. Oper. Dent.l996;2l:73-S0.
64. BURGhSS J.O., NORLING B.K. Improvements in Adhesive Luting Cements. Compend. Contin. Edu. Dcnl.l996;42: 67.
65. BFRTACCHlNIS M., ABATE P.P., BLANCK A., BAGLIETO M R, MACCHI R.L. Solubility and Fluoride Release in lonomers and Compomers. Quintessence lm.1999; 30: 193-197.
66. KAN K.C., MESSER L.B., MESS BR H,B-Varibility in Cytotoxicity and Fluoride Release of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements. J. Dent.ResJ 997; 76: 1502-1507.
67. CHUNG C.K., Mil .LETT D.T.. CREANOR S.U GILMOÜR W.FL, FOYE R.H. Fluoride Release and Cariostatic Ability of a Compomer and a Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cement Used for Orthodontic Bonding. J. Dent.1998; 26: 533-538.
68. KFLT.IENS H.M.A.M.. CREUGERS T.J., HOF MA.. CREUGERS N.HJ. A 4-Year Clinical Study on Amalgam, Resin Composite and Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cement Restorations in Overdenture Abutments. J.Dent 1999; 27. 551-555.
69. TA NT BIRO JIN D., DOUGLAS W.H.. VFRSLU1S A. Dihibitive Effect of a Resin- Modified Glass lonomer Cement on Remote Enamel Artilicial Caries. Caries Res. 1997; 31: 275-280.
70. DIJKEN J.W.V., KALFA S S., L1TRA V., OLIVEBY A Fluoride and Mutans Streptococci Levels in Plaque On Aged Restorations of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cement, Compomer and Resin Composite. Caries Res.l996;31: 379-383.
71. MUSA A., PEARSON G..L, GELBİER M. In Vitro Investigation of Fluoride Ion Release from Four Resin Modilied Glass Polyalkenoate Cements. Biomaterials.1196; 17: 1019-1023. 72. FRIBLD K-H-. SCHMALZ G.. HILLER K-A., SHAMS M. Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements: Fluoride Release and Influence on Streptococcus Mutans Growth. F.ur. 1. Oral Set.1997; 105: 81-85.
73 PKREIRA P.N.R., INOKOSHI S , TAGAMI J. In Vitro Secondary Caiies Inhibition Around Fluoride Releasing Materials. .1. Dent.1998; 26 505-510.
74. B ADR AWL W.A.. McCOMB D. Effect ol" Home-Use Fluoride Gels on Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements. Oper. Dent.1998; 23:2-9
75 TATE W.H., IWERS LM. Surface Roughness of Composites and Hybrid lonomers. Oper. Dent. 1996; 21: 53-58.
76. KANCHANAVASITA W., PEARSON G.J. Long lerrn Fle\ural Sienglh of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements. J- Dent. Res. 1996; 75:1 17.
77. FERRARI M., DAVIDSON CU Sealing Capacity of a Resin Modified Glass lonomer and Resin Composite Placed in Vivo in Class 5 Restorations. Oper. Dent.l996:21:69-72.
78. KLLEDGE D.A. Multifunctional Bases and Liners. Fsihet. Dent. 1998:42: 739-741.
79. CREANOR S.L. AWAWDEH I..A.. SAUNDERS W.P.. FOYE R.H.. GILMOlik W.IL: The Effect of a Resin Modilied Glass lonomer Restorative Material on Artificially Demincralised Dentine Caries in Vitro. J. Dent.1998;26: 527-531.
80. TAM L.E., CHAN G.P.L., YJM D. In Vitro Caries Inhibition Effects by Conventional and Resin Modified Glass lonomer Restorations. Oper. Dent.1997; 22: 4-14.
94
Alalürk
Oniv'-Di
; Hck.Fak.Dcrg. Cilt: 13, Savı: I, $^.88-95, 2003
ÇELEBİ
81. Mh'IKRS MILI.KR G.A. Antibacterial Activity af Dentin Bonding Systems, Resin Modified Glass lonomers, and Polyacid Modified Composite Resins. Oper. Dent, 19%; 21: 237-264.
82. DUNNE S.M., GOOLKIK J.S.. MİLLAR B.L, SEDDON R.P, Caries Inhibition by n Resin Modified and a Conventional Glass lonomer Cement, in Vitro. J. Dent. 1996; 24: 90-94.
83. ALLEN E.P., STEI'Hh'N C.B., BF.CKER I.R., DONOVAN T.E. Annual Review of Selected Dental Literature: Report of the Commitee on Scientific Investigation oJ' the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. J. IVosthet. Dent. 20(10:82: 27-66¬84. PALMKR G-, RKARSON GJ. 'Hie Effect of
Curring Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements, J.Dent.l99S;27: 303-311.
85- DONOVAN" D.E., CHO G.C. Contemporary Evaluation of Dental Cements. Compendium, i 999; 20: 197-219.
86. GLRZINA T.M., HLMh R.W. Diffusion of Monomers from Bonding Resin-Resin {.Composite Combinations Through Dentine in vitro. .1. Dent. 1996; 24: 125-128.
87. HAM1D A., OKAMOTO A„ IWAKU M,. HUME R.W. Component Release from Light-Activated Glass lonomer and Compomer Cements. J.Oral Rchabil.19%; 25: 94-99.
88. MAROUF N„ SIDHU S.K. A Study on the Radiopacity of Different Shades of Resin Modified Glass lonomur Restorative Materials. Opcr.Dcnt- 1998; 23: 10-14.
89. SHAH P.M.M., SIDHU S.K., CHONG U.S. FORD l'.R. Radıopacıty of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Liners and Hascs, .1. Prosthet, Dent. 1997; 77: 239-242.
90. KİELBASSA A.M., WRBAS K.II1HLLWIG P. Initial Tensile Rond Strengt of Resin Modified Glass lonomers and Polyacid Modified Resins on Perfused Primary Dentin. .1. Dent Child. 1997; 2: 183-187.
9!. THONEMANM B„ J-hDKKLIN M., SCMMALZ G., HILLER K,A, Resin Modified Glass lonomers for Luting Posterior Ceramic Restorations, Dent. Mater. 1995: I I: 161-168.
92. MITCHELL CA-, ORR J.F. Comparison of Conventional and Resin Modified Glass-lonomer Luting Cements in the Retention of Post Q own.s by Fatigue Loading. J.Oral Rehabil.1998: 25: 472-478.