Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

REZİN MODIFIYE CAM IYONOMERS İMANLAR

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2003

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The traditional glass ionomer cements, first introduced to dental profession by Wilson & Kent in 1972. Conventional glass-ionomer cements have been used variety of clinical applications because ol" their beneficial properties, such as adhesion to enamel and dentin, release of fluoride ions into adjancent tooth structure, cocllieient of thermal expansion is similar to that of denlin anü biocompatibılity with dental tisues. However, severe! problems have also been demostrated for example; working time is so short, setting time is long, they show consistent sensitivity to dehydration, they arc susceptablc to early moisture contamination. Recently, resin modified glass-ionomer cements have been developed . Resin modified glass-iunomci cements were used as restorative materials and luting agents. These materials are hybrids of silicates and carboxylase cements and leach fluoride into adjacent tooth structure over long periods.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Geleneksel cam iyonomer simanları ilk olarak Wilson ve Kent 1972 yılmda bulmuşlardır. Kovensiyoncl cam iyonomer simanlar ; dentin vc mineye bağlantıları, koın^u dokulara floriir iyonu salmaları, termal ekspansiyon katsayılarının dentin ile ben/er olması ve diş dokularına biyo ura-luluklannın iyi olması gibi olumlu özelliklerinden dolayı çeşitli klinik uygulamalarda kullanılmaktadır. Yinede kısa çalışma zamanı , uzun sertleşme zamanı, dehidralasyon göstermeleri ( erken nem koıUaminasyonuna duyarlı olmaları gibi olumsuz özelliklerinin de olduğu belirtilmiştir. Son zamanlarda yapısında rc/in içeren , rcin modifiyc cam iy-onomer simanlar geliştirilmiştir. Genellikle res to rat if mater-val ve yapıştırıcı si man olarak kullanılmaktadırlar Bu simanlar silikat ve karboksilat siman özelliklerinin bileşiminden olunmaktadır ve bulunduğu diş dokularına uzun süreli olarak llorür salmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-rezin-modifiye-cam-iyonomers-imanlar.pdf
  • 1
88-95
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

I. WILSON A.D., KENT B. h. A New Translucent Cement for Dentistry. Br. Dent, J. 1972, 15: 133-135.
ÇKLKBİ
2,
ZAİM0-3L
U A. , CAN G., F.RSOY H„ AKSU L. Diş Hekimliğinde Maddeler Bilgisi. Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Yayınları. 1993: 305-344.
3- QILO G. Luting Cements, Int. I3enL. .1. 1991; 41:
81-88.
4 DTAZ-ARNOLD A. M. Current Status of Luting Agents For Fixed Pruslhodontics. J. Frasihet. Dent.1999; 81: 135-141.
5. GRAHAM J. M, Glass lonomer Cements: Past, Present and Future, Oper. Dent. 1994; 19: 82-90.
6. MC CABE J- F.. WALLS A.W.G. Applied Dental Materials. London Hlaekuell Science Ltd. 5. Edition. 1998: 202-211.
7. M FRY ON S.D., STEPHFNS P,G.V BROWN F R.M- A Comparison of the in ViLro Cytotoxicity of Two Glass lonomer Cements. J. Dent. 1983; 62: 769-73. 8-YAVUZYILMAZ IF Metal Destekli Estetik (Veneer KaplamuJ Kronlar. Ankara, Gazi Üniversitesi iletişim Fakültesi Basımevi 1.Baskı.1996: 247-2:52.
9. SMITH D.C.. WILLIAMS D.F. Biocompatibility of Dental Materials. Florida. CRC Fress. Volume 2.1982: 143-173.
10. CFFAL Y.D.F.G.. S FA B RAB .G.M. FITeetWeness ol Surface Protection of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements Evaluated Spectrophotometries!}. Opcr. Dent. 2001; 26.401-405.
11. ZEGI1BROHCK L.V. : Cements. J. Estlicl. Dent. 1994; 7: 49-58.
m
r--!-. « ı^> n i" nı ı :K' 11; i nrm;L"TiC r \X
\jL. t^1»I IV U ., VJI IJ r.1 I jl^i HJ.,I\JIIIİ1\.1J. 1TJ..
Dental Materials, St. Louis. Meshy Year Book Inc. 5. Edition. 1992:126 143.
13. SMITH CD. Composition and Characleristicts of Glass lonomer Cements. J. AmDejit Assoc.1990; 120:19-22.
14. BERG -LH. The Continuum of Restorative Materials in Pediatric Dcn!istry-a Review for The Clinician. Pcdiatr Dent.1998: 20: 93-100.
I.T. LEE C-Q- Kva.1 nation of Glass lonomer as an Endodontic Sealant. J. Endodont. 1997; 23: 209-212.
91
Atatürk Üniv.Diş Hek.Fak.Dcrg. CİİUİ3, Sayırl, Sayfa:88-9:L 2003
ÇELEBİ
16. BARNES D.M., BLANK L.W.,GINGELL J.C. A Clinical Evaluation of A Resin Modified Glass lonomer Restorative Material. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1995:126: 1243-1255.
17. NOORT V. N. Denial Materials. London. Mosby Year Book Inc. London 1994: 106-135.
IS. MOUNT G..T. Clinical Placement of Modem Glass lonomer Cements. Quintessence Int.1993; 24: 99-106,
19. SETCHELL, DX, TEO. J.K., KHUN, A.T.: The Relative Solubilities of Four Modern Glass lonomer Cements. Br. Dent. J., 158, 220-222. (1985).
20. A YAD M.F., ROSFJM STILL S.F., WOFXFFX J.B The Effect of Recemantation on Crown Retention. Jnt. J.ProstbeT,1998; 11: 177-82.
21. ASHCRAFT D FL. STALFY R.N., JAKOBSEN J.R. Fluoride Release and Shear Bond Strenghls of Three Light-Cured Glass lonomer Cements. Am. J. Orlhod. Dentotae. Orthop. 1997; 1 11: 260-265.
22. SVANBERG M., MJOR I.A., QRSTAVIK Ü. Mutatis Streptococci in Plaque from Margins of Amalgam. Composite and Glass lonomer Restorations. J. Dent. Res.]989; 69: 861-864.
23. PARK S.H.. KIM K.Y. The Antikariogcnic FITccl of Fluoride in Primer. Bonding Agent and Composite Resin in the Cavosurfaee Enamel Area. Oper.Dent. 1997; 22: 115-120.
24. FORSS H., JOKINEN X SPETS -HAPPONEN S.S.. SEPPA L.. LIPOMA H. Fluoride and Mutans Streptococci in Plaque Grown on Glass lonomer and Composite. Caries Res. 1991; 25: 454-458.
25. RHZK-LHGA F., OGAARD B., ROLLA G Availability of Huoride from Glass lonomer Luting Cements in Human Saliva. Scand. J. Den Rcs.1990; 99: 60-63.
26. BFNDFRLt Y., HA I TON P., DAUGLAS I.
Çeşitli Cam İyonomer Simanların Fluorid Serbestleme ve Antibakteriyel Özellikleri Arasındaki Korelasyonun Değerlendirilmesi, H. Ü. Dışlıek. Der. 1999; 23: 12-17.
27. GLADYS S.. MEERBEEK B.V., BRAEM M., LAMBRECHTS P., VANHERLE G. Comparative Plıy s i co-Mechanical Characterization of New Hybrid Restorative Materials with Conventional Glass lonomer and Resin Composite Restorative Materials. J. Dent. Res.1997: 76: S83-S94.
28. REYTO R. Laser Tooth Whitening. Esther, Dcnt l99S;42: 755.
29. GFB AX, I.FXOUP G, WKRNER A, VREVER J-. DAVTDSON C.L- Structural Integrity of' Resin Modified Glass lonomers as Affected by the Delay or Ommision of LighL Activation- J. Fslhet. Dent. 1998; 77: 5658 1663.
30. MITCHELL C.A., DOUGLAS W.H., CHENG Y.S. Fracture Thougiicss of Conventional. Resin Modified Glass lonomer and Composite Lutjng Cements. Dent. Mater.1999; 15:7-13.
31. BELL R.B., BARKMEIER W.W, Glass lonomer Restoratives and Liners. J. Esther Dent.1994; 6; 129-134.
32. CROIX T.P., KILLTAN CM.. HF.IPIN MX. A Restorative Dentistrv Renaissance for Children. Light-Hardened Glass lonomer/Resin ("emenL. .1. Dent. Child. 1993: March-April: 89 94.
33. LEEVAfLOJ C. PLATT J.A.. COCHRAN M.A. In Vitro Study of Fracture Incidence and Compressive Fracture Load-off all Ceramic Crowns Cemented with Resin Modified Glass lonomer and other Luting Agents. .1. PiostheL Dent. I 998; 80: 699-707.
34. KLRBY R.E., KNOB LOCH L.. THAKUR A. Slrenght Properties of Visible-Light-Curcd Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements . Opcr. DcnU 997: 22: 79-83.
35. ATTIN T.. VATASCHKI M., I İKİ XWIG E. Properties ol Resin Modified Glass lonomer Restorative Materials and Two Polyaeid Modified Resin Composite Materials, Quintessence Int. 1996; 27: 203-209.
36. SMALES R.J., KOUSTIKAS T. Occlusal Wear of Rcsm lonomer Restorative Materials. A List Dent. .L1995; 40: 171-172.
92
Atatürk Üniv.Diş Hek.Fak.Derg. ÇELEBİ Cilt:l3. Sayı:L Sayfa:88-95,2003
37. CHO E., KOPFL H., WHITE S.N. Moisture Susceptibility of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Materials. Quintessence InU995; 26:351-358.
38. LIM C.C., MEO J., YAPA. The Influence of Finishing Time on the Marginal Seal of a Resin Modified Glass lonomer and Polyacid Modified Resin Composite. J. Oral Rchabil.1999; 26: 48-52.
39. FRIELD K.H.. POWERS P.M., H1LLER K.A. Influence of Different Factors on Bond Strenght of Hybrid lonomers. Oper. Dent.l995;20i 74-80.
40. VAIKUNTAM .1. Resin Modilied Glass lonomer Cements : Implications for Use in Pediatric Dentistry. J. Dent. Child. 1997; March-April: 131-134.
41. FKANKEL N., PHARSON GJ., LABEL!.A R. Long-term Strenght of Aesthetics Restoratives. .1. Oral Rchabil.l998;25: 89-93.
42. KNOBLOCH L.A, KERBY F.R., SEGHI R., BERLIN J.S., LhK J.S. Fracture Toughness of Resin-Based Luting Cements. J. Proslhet. Dent. 2000; 83: 204-209.
43. FOLKESSON U.H., ANDFRSSON I.E., VAK-DÜKEN JW.V. Resin ModiFed Glass lonomer Cement Restorations in Primary Molars. Swcd. Dent. 1999; 1-9
44- BURGESS 1, NOR LING B., SUBMIT! J. Resin lonomer Restorative Materials: The New Generation. J.Esthel- Denl.1994; 6: 207-215.
45- BOUISCHL1CHKR M.R., VARGAS M.A., DENEHY G-H. Effect of Desiccation on Microleakage of Five Class 5 Restorative Materials. Oper. Dent.1996; 2J: 90-95
46. KANCHANAVASITA W., PEARSON GJ , ANSTICE H.M. Factors Contributing to the Temperature Rise During Polymerization of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements. Biomaterials.1996; 17; 2305-2312.
47. FRrCKER J.P. A New Self-Curing Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cement for the Direct Bonding of Orthodontias Brackets in Vivo. Am. .1. Orthot. Dcntofacial Orthop.1998; I! 3: 384-386.
48. CA't TANI-LORENTF M.A., DUPUIS V., MOYA F.. PA YAN J„ MEYFR J.M. Competitive Study of the Pysical Properties of the Polyacid Modified Glass lonomer Cement Dent. Mater.1999; 15: 21-32.
49. YAP A.U..L, QUEK C.E.Y., KAU C.H. Repair of New-Generation Tooth-Colored Restoratives: Methods of Surface Conditioning to Achieve Bonding. Oper,Dcnl.l998;23: 173-178.
50. BOILLAGÜET S., ASSAF Y.. VIRG1LL1TO M.. JACQIiEZ H., MEYER J.M. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Resin-Reinforced Glass lonomer Cement. Acta Vied. Dcnt-1998; 4:14-19.
51 UNO S., FINGER WJ„ FRITZ U. Long Term Characteristics of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Restorative Materials. Dent. Mater. 1996; 12: 64-69.
52. ATTIN T., BUCHALLA W., HELLWIG E. Influence of Enamel Conditioning on Bond Strenght ol Resin Modified GlaiS lonomer Restorative Materials and Polyacid Modified Composites. J. IVosthct. Dent. 1996; 76: 29-33.
53. MIYAZAK1 M., MOORE B.K., ONOSE IT. Effect of Surface Coatings on Flexural Properties of Glass lonomers. Hur. J. Oral Sci.l 196; 104: 600-604.
54. DUNCAN J.P., PAMEUER C.H. Retention of Parallel-Sided Titanium Posts Cemented with Six Luting Agents: An in Vitro Study. J. Prostfiet Dent.1998; 80: 423-428.
55. MIYAZAKI M.( IWASAKI K., SOYAMÜRA T-. ONOSE H., MOORE B.K. Resin Modified Glass lonomers: Dentin Bond Strength Versus l ime. Oper. Dent.1998: 23. 144-149. 5G. FEREIRA P.N.R., YAMADA T.; INOKOSHI S.. BURROW M.F., SANO IT. TAGAMI J. Adhesion of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements Using Resin Bonding Systems. J. Dent.1998; 26: 479-485.
57. RUSZ J.E., ANTONUCCI J.M.. EICHMILLRR F.v ANDERSON M.H. Adhesive Properties of Modified Glass lonomer Cements. Dent. Mater. I 992; 8: 31-36.
58. MORAND J.M., JONAS P. Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cement Restoration of Posterior Teeth With lYoximal Carious Lesions. Oper. Dcnt.1995; 26: 389-394
93
Atatürk Üniv.Diş Hek.Fak.Der£;. Cilt: 13. Sayul, Sayf&:88-95, 2003
ÇELEBİ
59.
CHIRISHENS
E G.J. Glass lonomer Resin: A Maturing OonccpL J. Am. Denl. Assoc.1993; 124: 248-249.
60.
SAYGİL
İ G. Rc/in-Modifiye Cam-İyoııomer ve Pol i asi t-Modifiye Kompozit Simanların Klinik Kullanımları. H. 0. Dişhek. Der.1998; 1:26-31.
61. U Z.C., WHITE S.N. Mechanical Properties ol" Dental Luting Cements. J. Prosthet. Dent.1999; SI: 597-609.
62. LI J., LTTJ Y., SORLMARK R.: Flexure Strenght of Resin Modilied Glass lonomer Cements and their Bond SLrengt to Dental Composites. Acta Odontol. Scund.1996: 54: 55-58. 63. 1NOKOSHİ S., BURROW M.F.. KATAÜM1 M ..YAMADA T..TAKAT5U T Opacity ™d Color Changes of Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials. Oper. Dent.l996;2l:73-S0.
64. BURGhSS J.O., NORLING B.K. Improvements in Adhesive Luting Cements. Compend. Contin. Edu. Dcnl.l996;42: 67.
65. BFRTACCHlNIS M., ABATE P.P., BLANCK A., BAGLIETO M R, MACCHI R.L. Solubility and Fluoride Release in lonomers and Compomers. Quintessence lm.1999; 30: 193-197.
66. KAN K.C., MESSER L.B., MESS BR H,B-Varibility in Cytotoxicity and Fluoride Release of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements. J. Dent.ResJ 997; 76: 1502-1507.
67. CHUNG C.K., Mil .LETT D.T.. CREANOR S.U GILMOÜR W.FL, FOYE R.H. Fluoride Release and Cariostatic Ability of a Compomer and a Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cement Used for Orthodontic Bonding. J. Dent.1998; 26: 533-538.
68. KFLT.IENS H.M.A.M.. CREUGERS T.J., HOF MA.. CREUGERS N.HJ. A 4-Year Clinical Study on Amalgam, Resin Composite and Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cement Restorations in Overdenture Abutments. J.Dent 1999; 27. 551-555.
69. TA NT BIRO JIN D., DOUGLAS W.H.. VFRSLU1S A. Dihibitive Effect of a Resin- Modified Glass lonomer Cement on Remote Enamel Artilicial Caries. Caries Res. 1997; 31: 275-280.
70. DIJKEN J.W.V., KALFA S S., L1TRA V., OLIVEBY A Fluoride and Mutans Streptococci Levels in Plaque On Aged Restorations of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cement, Compomer and Resin Composite. Caries Res.l996;31: 379-383.
71. MUSA A., PEARSON G..L, GELBİER M. In Vitro Investigation of Fluoride Ion Release from Four Resin Modilied Glass Polyalkenoate Cements. Biomaterials.1196; 17: 1019-1023. 72. FRIBLD K-H-. SCHMALZ G.. HILLER K-A., SHAMS M. Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements: Fluoride Release and Influence on Streptococcus Mutans Growth. F.ur. 1. Oral Set.1997; 105: 81-85.
73 PKREIRA P.N.R., INOKOSHI S , TAGAMI J. In Vitro Secondary Caiies Inhibition Around Fluoride Releasing Materials. .1. Dent.1998; 26 505-510.
74. B ADR AWL W.A.. McCOMB D. Effect ol" Home-Use Fluoride Gels on Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements. Oper. Dent.1998; 23:2-9
75 TATE W.H., IWERS LM. Surface Roughness of Composites and Hybrid lonomers. Oper. Dent. 1996; 21: 53-58.
76. KANCHANAVASITA W., PEARSON G.J. Long lerrn Fle\ural Sienglh of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements. J- Dent. Res. 1996; 75:1 17.
77. FERRARI M., DAVIDSON CU Sealing Capacity of a Resin Modified Glass lonomer and Resin Composite Placed in Vivo in Class 5 Restorations. Oper. Dent.l996:21:69-72.
78. KLLEDGE D.A. Multifunctional Bases and Liners. Fsihet. Dent. 1998:42: 739-741.
79. CREANOR S.L. AWAWDEH I..A.. SAUNDERS W.P.. FOYE R.H.. GILMOlik W.IL: The Effect of a Resin Modilied Glass lonomer Restorative Material on Artificially Demincralised Dentine Caries in Vitro. J. Dent.1998;26: 527-531.
80. TAM L.E., CHAN G.P.L., YJM D. In Vitro Caries Inhibition Effects by Conventional and Resin Modified Glass lonomer Restorations. Oper. Dent.1997; 22: 4-14.
94
Alalürk
Oniv'-Di
; Hck.Fak.Dcrg. Cilt: 13, Savı: I, $^.88-95, 2003
ÇELEBİ
81. Mh'IKRS MILI.KR G.A. Antibacterial Activity af Dentin Bonding Systems, Resin Modified Glass lonomers, and Polyacid Modified Composite Resins. Oper. Dent, 19%; 21: 237-264.
82. DUNNE S.M., GOOLKIK J.S.. MİLLAR B.L, SEDDON R.P, Caries Inhibition by n Resin Modified and a Conventional Glass lonomer Cement, in Vitro. J. Dent. 1996; 24: 90-94.
83. ALLEN E.P., STEI'Hh'N C.B., BF.CKER I.R., DONOVAN T.E. Annual Review of Selected Dental Literature: Report of the Commitee on Scientific Investigation oJ' the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. J. IVosthet. Dent. 20(10:82: 27-66¬84. PALMKR G-, RKARSON GJ. 'Hie Effect of
Curring Resin Modified Glass lonomer Cements, J.Dent.l99S;27: 303-311.
85- DONOVAN" D.E., CHO G.C. Contemporary Evaluation of Dental Cements. Compendium, i 999; 20: 197-219.
86. GLRZINA T.M., HLMh R.W. Diffusion of Monomers from Bonding Resin-Resin {.Composite Combinations Through Dentine in vitro. .1. Dent. 1996; 24: 125-128.
87. HAM1D A., OKAMOTO A„ IWAKU M,. HUME R.W. Component Release from Light-Activated Glass lonomer and Compomer Cements. J.Oral Rchabil.19%; 25: 94-99.
88. MAROUF N„ SIDHU S.K. A Study on the Radiopacity of Different Shades of Resin Modified Glass lonomur Restorative Materials. Opcr.Dcnt- 1998; 23: 10-14.
89. SHAH P.M.M., SIDHU S.K., CHONG U.S. FORD l'.R. Radıopacıty of Resin Modified Glass lonomer Liners and Hascs, .1. Prosthet, Dent. 1997; 77: 239-242.
90. KİELBASSA A.M., WRBAS K.II1HLLWIG P. Initial Tensile Rond Strengt of Resin Modified Glass lonomers and Polyacid Modified Resins on Perfused Primary Dentin. .1. Dent Child. 1997; 2: 183-187.
9!. THONEMANM B„ J-hDKKLIN M., SCMMALZ G., HILLER K,A, Resin Modified Glass lonomers for Luting Posterior Ceramic Restorations, Dent. Mater. 1995: I I: 161-168.
92. MITCHELL CA-, ORR J.F. Comparison of Conventional and Resin Modified Glass-lonomer Luting Cements in the Retention of Post Q own.s by Fatigue Loading. J.Oral Rehabil.1998: 25: 472-478.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com