Buradasınız

AĞIZ İÇİ PORSELEN TAMİR SİSTEMLERİ

INTRAORAL PORCELAIN REPAIR SYSTEMS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
Porcelain fused to metal restorations are widely used for the fixed prosthodontic rehabiiitattton. Although porcelain restorations have advantages such as high esthetic and biocompatibi/tty, therr britt/eness is one of the most important disadvantages. In fractured porcelain, extraoral reparr is regarded as a treatment method but tt is time consuming and expensive. Especially in removal of multtuntt bridges, some compttcattons may occur involving with supporting teeth and porcelain; therefore, intraoral reparr seems to be more conservative approach. Because nntraoral reparr of the restoration is not possible with porcelain, composites are used as reparr materials. The suitable surface treatment should be made in order to achieve a succesfull bond between composite and fracture surface. To obtain enough bonding between composite and porcelain-metal surface, both mechanical methods such as diamond bur roughening, arr abrasion, asit etching, silica coating and chemical methods including s/lane, metal primer and bonding agents are used. The success of porcelain reparr is related to the longevity of the repaired restoration use and the opthimum esthetic outcome.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Sabtt protetkk rehabilttasyonda metal destekli porselen restorasyon/ar günümüzde yaygın brr şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Porselenin estetik ve biyouyumluluk gibi avantajlarının yanı sıra, kırılgan bir malzeme olması en büyük dezavantajıdır. Porselen kırığında tedavi seçeneklerinden biri o/arak restorasyonun ağız dışı tamiri düşünülse de, bu zaman alıcı ve pahalı brr yöntemdir. Özellikle çok üyeii köprülerde protezin yerinden çıkarılması sırasında destek dişlerde ve protezde meydana gelebilecek komplkasyonlar, restorasyonun ağız içi tamirini daha konservatff brr yaklaşım haline getirmektedir. Porselen yapımı ağız içinde gerçek/eştiri/e-mediğinden atternatff tamir materyali o/arak kompozitler kullanılmaktadır. Kompozttnn, kırı/ma sonucu açığa çıkmış yüzeye başarılı bir şekilde bağlanması için öncelikle uygun brr yüzey hazrrlğı yapılmalıdır. Kompozttnn porselen-metal yüzeyine bağ/anmasında, elmas frezle pürüzlendrrme, arr abrazyon, asitle pürüz/endirme ve s/lika kaplama gibi mekanik bağlanma yöntemleriyle birlikte, si/an, metal primer ve bonding gibi kimyasal ajan/ar da kul/anılır. Porselen tamirinin başarısı hizmet süresinin uzunluğuna ve optimum estetik sağ/anmasına bağlıdır.

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Özcan M, Niedermier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of reparrs. Int J Prosthodont2002; 15(3): 299-302.
2. Phoenix RD, Shen C. Characterization of treated porcelain surfaces via dynamic contact angle analysis. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8:187-194.
3. Appedoorn RE, Wl/werdind TM, Barkmeter WWW Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain reparr systems. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 6-11.
38
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt: 16, Sayı: 1, Yıl: 2006, Sayfa: 34-40
4. Creugers NHC, Snoek PA, Kayser AF. An experimental porcelain repair system evaluated under controlled clinical conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 724-727.
5. O'Brien WJ. Dental Materials and Their Selection. 2 ed Quintessence, Chicago,1997: 1-13, 43, 79-90, 99, 287.
6. Mc Lean JW. The Science and Art of Dental Ceramics. Volum I. Quintessence, Chicago, 1979: 23.
7. Margeas RC. Salvaging a porcelain- fused to metal bridge with intraoral ceramic repair. Compend Contnn Educ Dent2002; 23(10): 952-956.
8. Daaz-Arnod AM, Schneider RL, Aqu/inno SA. Bond strength of nntraoral porcelain reparr materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61:305-309.
9. Llobell A, Nichols JI, Kois JC, Dayy CH. Fatigue iff e of porcelain repair systems. Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5:205-213.
10. Denehy G, Bouschtcher M, Vargos M. Intraoral repair of cosmetic restorations. Dental Clinics of North America 1998; 42(4): 719-737.
11. Kamada K, Yoshda K, Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79:508-513.
12. Berto/otti RL. A new polymer glass utilized for modification and reparr of fixed partaal dentures. Quintessence International 1997; 28(7): 437-439.
13. Roulet JF, Degrange M. Adhesion the Silent Revolution in Dentistry, 2000, Germany, p 81-92.
14. Hasetton DR, Diaz- Arnold AM, Dunne JT. Shear bond strengths of 2 nntraoral porcelain reparr systems to porcelain or metal substrates. J Prosthet Dent2001; 86(5): 526-531.
15. Berto/otti RL, Lacy AM, Watanabe LG. Adhesive monomers for porcelain reparr. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2: 483-489.
16. Chung K, Hwang Y. Bonding strength of porcelain repair system with various surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78:267-274.
17. Frankenberger R, Kramer N. Reparr srengths of etched vs silica-coated metal -ceramic and all-ceramic restorations. Operative Dentistry 2000; 25: 209-215.
ÇAPA, ÖZKURT, KAZAZOĞLU
18. Matsumura H, Yanagda H, Tanoue N, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Shear bond strengt of resin composite veneering material to god alloy with varying metal surface preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 315-319.
19. Woff DM, Power JM, O'Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain reparr agents. Dent Mater 1992; 8:158-161.
20. Lacy AM, La/uz J, Watanabe LG, De/innges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the compose. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60:288-291.
21. Thurmond JW, Barkmeter WWW, W/lwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on the bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthodont 1994; 72: 355-359.
22. Robbnns JW. Intraoral reparr of the fractured porcelain restoration. Operative Dentistry 1998; 23: 203-207.
23.
Gürel G. Porselen Lamtnat Vener/er Bilim ve Sanatı. 1. baskı, Quintessence Yayındık, İstanbul, 2004: 115-131.
24. Özcan M, Va/itttu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dental Materials 2003; 19: 725-731.
25. Attta A, Kern M. Fracture strength of all- ceramic crown luted using two bonding methods. J Prosthet Dent2004; 91:247-252.
26. Tylka DF, Stewart GP. Comparison of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and hydrofluoric acid etchants for porcelain- composite repair. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72:121-127.
27. Kuptec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, W/lwerding TM. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porce/ain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76:119-124.
28. Pamejer CH, Louw NP, Fischer D. Repairing Fractured Porcelain: How surface preparation affects shear force resistance. JADA 1996; 127(2): 203-209.
29. Oh W, Shen C. Effect of surface topography on the bond sterngth of a composite to three different types of ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 241¬246.30. Shen C, Oh W, Wi/iaams JR. Effect of post-s/lanization drying on the bond strength of composite to ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 453-458.
31. Kuptec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeter WW, W/lwerding TM. Evaluating of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite to porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76:119-124.
32. Wood DP, Jordan RE, Way DC, Gail/ KA. Bonding porce/a/n and god. Am J Orthod 1986; 89( 3 ): 194-205.
33. Özden AN, Akattan F, Can G. Effect of surface treatment of porce/a/n on the shear bond strength of applied dual cured cement. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72:85-88.
34. Sorensen J A, Engelman M J, Torress T J, Avera S P. Shear bond strength of compose resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1991; 4:17-23.
35. Hayakawa T, Hor/e K, A/da m, Kanaya H, Kobayasht T, Murata Y. The influence of surface conditions and s/tane agents on the bond of resin to dental porcelain. Dent Mater 1992; 8:238-240.
36. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period and s/tane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998; 23:250-7.
37. Jardel V, Degrande M, Picard B, Derrien G. Correlation of topography to bond strength of etched ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12:59-64
38. Tarozzo LSA, Mattos MGC, Riberro RF, Semprini M. Comparison of retentive systems for composites used as atternattves to porcelain in fixed partaal dentures. J Prosthet Dent2003; 89(6): 572-578.
39. Hooshmand T, Noort R, Keshvad A. Bond durabittty of the resin-bonded and s/tane treated ceramic surface. Dental Materials 2002; 18:179-188.
40. Newburg R, Pamejer CH. Compose resins bonded to porcelain with s/tane solutions. J Am Assoc 1978; 96:288-291.
41. Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Avera SP. Porcelain-composite interface micro/eakage with various porcelain surface treatments. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 118-123.
ÇAPA, ÖZKURT, KAZAZOĞLU
42. Antonaadou M, Kern M, Sturb JR. Effect of a new metal primer on the bond strength between a resin cement and two high-noble alloys. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84 (5): 554-560.
43. Ohkubo C, Kono H, Tanaka Y, Watanabe I. Shear bond strength of resin composite to magnetic Fe-Pt alloy. J Prosthet Dent2005; 93(5): 478-482.
44. Suiman AAA, Swift EJ, Perdtago J. Effect of surface treatment and bonding agent on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70:118-120.
45. Knight JS, Sneed WD, Wilson MC. Strength of composite bonded to base metal alloy using dentin bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 149¬153.
46. Gregory WA, Hagen CA, Powers JM. Composite resin reparr of porcelain using different bonding materials. Oper Dent 1988; 13:114-118.
47. A/da M, Hayakawa T, Mzukawa K. Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 464-470.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com