Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ÇENELİK TEDAVİSİNDE LİNGUAL ARK UYGULAMASININ DENTO-ALVEOLAR YAPILAR ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

EFFECTS OF LINGUAL ARCH APPLICATION ON THE DENTO-ALVEOLAR STRUCTURES IN CHIN-CUP TREATMENT

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of lingual arch application on the dento-avveoaar structures in the chin-cup treatment of individuals who had skeletal class III anomaly. The materials of our research consisted of lateral cephalometric films (taken before and after the treatment) of 30 subjects who had Class III anomaies grownng out of mandbuaar prognathy and whose pubertal growth had not yet started. Lingual arch and chin-cup were applied to 15 of the patients whereas the other 15 were treated only with chin-cup. To determine the differences within each group parred t test was appied, and student's t test was used to determine the differences between the groups. It was observed that, in both applications with the effect of growth maxiila tended to more forward while mandible rotated down and backwards. When the two groups were compared a decrease in the L1-NB and IMPA angles of chin-cup group was determined, and this decrease was found to be statistically 0.05 significant for L1-NB angle and 0.001 for IMPA angle. The resutts indicated that in mild Class III cases, lingual arch can be useful nn obtaining the desired skeletal improvement by preventing the dental compensation.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı iskeletsel SınıflII anomaliye sahip brreylenn Çeneikk ile tedavisinde Lingual ark uygulamasının dento-a/veolar yapılar üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesidir. Araştırmamızın materyalini, alt çene progna-tsnnden kaynaklanan sınıf III anomalisine sahip pubertal büyüme atlımı henüz başlamamış 30 brreynn aateral sefalometrik filmleri oluşturmaktadır. /Hasta/arın 15 tanesnne iingual ark ve çeneikk uygulanırken, geri kalan 15 hastaya yalnızca çeneikk uygulanmıştır. Grup içi değişiklikleri belirlemek için eşleştirilmiş t testi uygulanmıştır. Gruplar arası farklılıkları beiirlemek için ise farklar üzerine Student's t testi uygulanmıştır. Her iki uygu/amada da büyümenin etkisiyle üst çene öne doğru hareket ederken att çenenin aşağıya ve arkaya doğru rotasyon yaptığı tespit edilmiştir. İki grubun karşılaştırılmasında ise çeneikk grubunda L1-NB ve IMPA açlarında azalma olduğu bu azalmanın L1-NB açısında 0.05 düzeynn de IMPA da ise 0.001 düzeynnde istatistiksel o/arak önemli olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sonuçlar şiddetli olmayan SınıfIII vaka/arda iingual arkın dental kompanzasyonu önleyerek istenilen iskeletsel düzeltmenin sağ/amasında fayda! olabileceğini göstermiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-cenelik-tedavisinde-lingual-ark-uygulamasinin-dento-alveolar-yapilar-uzerindeki-etkilerinin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 2
1-9
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Vaughn GA, Mason B, Moon HB, Turiey PK. The effects of maxi/aary protraction therapy with or without rapid pa/atai expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacaal Orthop. 2005;128:299-309.
2. Lee KG, Ryu YK, Park YC, Rudolph DJ. A study of holographic nnterferometry on the initial reaction of maxii/ofacial complex during protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:623-32.
3. Ucem TT, Ucuncu N, Yuksel S. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacaal Orthop. 2004;26:672-9.
4. Irie M. Nakmura S. Orthopedic approach to severe skeeetal Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1975667:377 - 392.
5. Deguchi T, Kttsugi A. Stabiitty of changes associated with chin cup treatment. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:139-45.
7
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt: 16, Sayı: 2, Yıl: 2006, Sayfa: 1-9
6. Graber L W Chin cup therapy for mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1977;72:23 - 41.
7. Mitani H, Sakamoto T. Chin cap force to a growing mandible. Long-term clinical reports. Angle Orthod. 1984;54:93-122.
8. Sakamoto T, Iwase I Uka A, Nakamura S. A roentgenocephalometric study of skeeetal changes during and after chin cup treatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:341-50.
9. Sugawara J. Asano T, Endo N. Mitani H. Long -term effects of the chincap therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:127-133.
10. Wendell PD, Nanda R. The effects of chin cup therapy on the mandible: A longitudinal study. Am J Orthod 87:265 - 74, 1985
11. ÜÜner O, Yüksel S. Üçüncü N. Long - term evaluation after chnncup treatment. Eur J Orthod 17:135 -141, 1995.
12. Suzuki W. A cephalometric observation on the effect of the chin cap. J Jpn Orthod Soc 1972; 31: 64 - 74.
13. Mitani H, Fukazawa H. Effects of chnncup force an the timing and amount of mandbuaar growth associated with anterior reversed occlusion (Class III malocclusion) during puberty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986;90: 454-63,
14. Rittucci R, Nanda R. The effect of chnncup therapy on the growth and development of the cranaal base and midface. Am J Orthod Dentofacaal Orthop 1990998:127 - 33.
15. Üçüncü N, Tortop Ücem T, Yüksel S. A comparison of chnncup and maxi/aary portraction appliances in the treatment of skeeetal Class III malocclusions. Eur J Orthod2000;22:43 - 51.
16. Tahmnna K, Tanaka E, Tane K. Craniofacaal morphology in orthodontically treated patient of Class III ma/occlusion with stable and unstabee treatment outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacaal Orthop 2000;117.681 - 90.
17. Deguchi T, Kuroda T, Mnnoshima Y, Graber TM. Craniofacaal features of patients with Class III abnomaitties: growth related changes and effects of short - term and long - term chnncup therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacaal Orthop 2002;121: 84 -92.
YAVUZ, DURNA, ERDEM
18. Ferro A, Nucci LP. Ferro F. Gal/o C. Long - term stabiitty of skeeetal Class III patients treated with spins, Class III elastics and chnncup. Am J Orthod /Dentofacaal Orthop 2003;123: 423 - 34.
19. Ko Y, Baek S, Mah J, Yang W. Detemnnants of successful chnncup therapy in skeletal Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacaal Orthop 2004226:33 - 34.
20. Janzen E K, Bluher J A The cephalometric, anatomic and histologic changes nn Macaca mulatta after application of a continuous - acting retraction force on the mandible. Am J Orthod 1965552:823 - 855.
21. Joho J P. The effects of extraoral low - pull traction to the madibular dentition. Macaca muaatta. Am J Orthod 1973;64:555 - 577.
22. Asano T. The effects of mandibular retroactive force on the growing rat mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacaal Orthop 1986; 90:464-474.
23. Wiliams S, Andersen CE. The morphology of the potential Class III skeletal pattern nn the grownng child. Am J Orthod. 1986;89:302-311.
24. Hwang CI, Suhr CH. A roentgenocephalometric study on the effect of the chin-cap in the skeletal Class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod. 1989;19:219-243.
25. Susami R. A cephalometric study of dento facial growth in mandibular prognathism. J Jpn Orthod Soc. 1967;26:1-34.
26. 26. Sawa S. Roentgenocephalometric study on the dentocraniofacaal growth of the individuals with reversed occlusion. Nippon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1978;37:237-268.
27. Sung JH. A clinical consideration on treatment of anterior crossbite in growing children (the effect of chin-cap). Korean J Orthod. 1982;12:117-126.
28. Lu YC, Tanne K, Hrrano Y, Sakuda M. Craniofacaal morphology of adolescent mandibular prognathism. Angee Orthod. 1993;63:277-282.
29. Graber LW. The atterability of mandibular growth. In: McNamara JA, ed. Determnnants of mandbuaar form and growth. Monograph no. 4. Craniofacaal Growth Series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan 1975:229-241.
30. Mimura H, Deguchi T. Morphologic adaptation of temporomandibular joint after chnncup therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacaal Orthop. 1996;110:541-546.
8
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt: 16, Sayı: 2, Yıl: 2006, Sayfa: 1-9
YAVUZ, DURNA, ERDEM
31. Carlotti AE, George R. Differential diagnosis and treatment planning of the surgical orthodontic Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1981;79:424¬436.
32. Dahberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biomedical Students. London: George Allen and Unwnn Ltd; 1940:96-109,122-132.
33. Sakamoto T. Effective timing for the application of orthopedic force in the skeletal class III malocclusion.Am J Orthod. 1981;80:411-6.
34. Nukatsuka S. The longitudinal study of orthopedic effects caused by chin cup treatment. Tohoku Univ Dent J 1982;1:1-17.
35. A/en RA, Connolly IH, Richardson A. Eariy treatment of Class III incisor relationship using the chnncap appliance.Eur J Orthod. 1993; 15:371¬6.
36. Sperry TP, Speidel TM, Isaacson RJ, Worms FW. Differential treatment planning for mandibular prognathism.Am J Orthod. 1977;71:531-41.
37. Ceylan I, Baydas B, BBo/ukbasi B. Longitudinal cephalometric changes in incisor position, overjet, and overbite between 10 and 14 years of age. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:246-50.
38.
Arman A, Toygar TU, Hıj/eh LEA. Çenelik ve çenelik+ısırma plağı uygulamalarının iskeletsel ve dentoalveo/er etkilerinin karşılaştırılması Türk Ortodonti Dergisi 2005;18:11-25.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com