Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

FARKLI UYGULAMA YÖNTEMLERİNİN KOMPOZİT REZİNLERİN MİKROSERTLİKLERİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT APPLICATION METHODS OF COMPOSITE RESINS ON MICROHARDNESS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2007

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different application methods of composite resins on microhardness. Materials and Methods: Test samples (2mm thick, 6mm in diameter, n=12) were prepared by using a hybrid composite (Flttek Z250, 3MESPE, St. Paul MN, USA). Following applications were performed on the surface of the specimens. Group1: Direct application (only composite application). Group2: Composite application under myaar strip. Group3: Composite application with Panavia F Oxyguard II (Kuraray Medical Inc, Japan). Group4: Composite application with Biscover (Bisco, Inc. Schaumburg, IL, USA). The hardness test was performed using a digital microhardness tester (Bueh/er, Lake Bluff, Ilinnois, USA) (load: 500 g; dwell time: 15 seconds). All samples were measured from the top and the bottom of the composite discs. Data were anayyzed by using Student t-test, One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (p<0.05). Results: The mean values and standard deviations are as follows: Group1 (top=66,29±3,29; bottom=66,01±2,75), Group2 (top=64,85±2,68; bottom =52,06±5,16), Group3 (top=53,92±3,92; bottom=48,49±3,50), Group4 (top=62,42±5,19; bottom=55,21±6,67). According to these results, Group3 showed statistically significant difference between the other three groups. Conclusion: Application of Panavia F Oxyguard II to the surface of the composite significantly reduced the microhardness values.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı uygulama yöntemlerinin kompoztt reznnlerin mikrosertliğine o/an etkisinin incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 2mm kalınlığında, 6mm çapında (n=12) test örnekleri, hibrid brr kompoztt (F/ttek Z250, 3MESPE, St. Paul MN, USA) kut/ant/arak hazır/andı. Örneklerin yüzeyine şu uygu/amalar yapıldı: Grupl: Sadece direkt kompoztt uygulaması yapıldı. Grup2: Myaar strip attında kompoztt uygulandı. Grup3: Panavia F Oxyguard II (Kuraray Medical Inc, Japan) ile kompoztt uygulaması yapıldı. Grup4: Biscover (Bisco, Inc. Schaumburg, IL, USA) ile kompoztt uygulaması yapıldı. Sertlik test, dijital mikrosert/ik test cihazı (Bueh/er, Lake Bluff, Iliinois, USA) (kuvvet: 500 g; dwell time: 15 saniye) kul/anılarak gerçekleştirildi. Tüm örnekler üst ve alt yüzeylerinden ölçüldü. Veriler Student t-test, One-Way ANOVA ve Tukey's test ile anatz edildi (p<0.05). Bulgular: Ortalama değerler ve standart sapma/ar şu şekildedir: Grupl: (üst=66,29±3,29; att=66,01±2,75), Grup2 (üst=64,85±2,68; att=52,06±5,16), Grup3 (üst=53,92±3,92; att=48,49±3,50), Grup4 (üst=62,42±5,19; att=55r21±6r67). Bu sonuç/ara göre Grup3, diğer üç grup ile arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark gösterdi. Sonuç: Kompozitin yüzeyine Panavia F Oxyguard II uygulaması mikrosert/ik değerlerini anlam/ı derecede azatttı.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-farkli-uygulama-yontemlerinin-kompozit-rezinlerin-mikrosertlikleri-uzerine-etkisi.pdf
  • 1
28-31
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials. 10 ed CV Mosby, St. Louis, 1997.
2. Kaaachandra S. Influence of filers on the water sorption of composites. Dental Materials 1989; 5(4): 283-8.
3. Martin N, Jedynaktewtcz N. Measurement of water sorption in dental composites. Btomaterials 1998; 19(1-3): 77-83.
4. Meyer JM, Cattan--Lorente MA, Dupuis V. Compomers: between glass-tonomer cements and composites. Biomateria/s 1998; 19(6): 529-39.
5. Ml/Is RW, Uhl A, B/ackwe/l GB, Jandt KD. High power light emitting diode (LED) arrays versus halogen light polymerization of oral biomateria/s: Barcol hardness, compressive strength and radiometric properties. Biomateria/s 2002; 23(14): 2955-63.
6.
Özel
E. Beş farklı restoratff materyatnn su em/timinin dtsttle suda ve yapay tükürükte in vitro incelenmesi. Yeditepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bitimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 2003, Master Tezi.
7.
Özel
E. Kompoztt reznneernn su emic/tiği. Akademik Dental Dişhekimtiği Dergisi2002; 4(4): 25-8.
30
A t a t ü r k Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt:17, Sayı: 1, Y ı l : 2007, Sayfa: 28-31
8. Price RB, Ehrnford L, Andreou P, Feiix CA. Comparison of quartz-tungsten-halogen, t/ght-emttting diode and plasma arc curing lights. J Adhes Dent2003; 5(3): 193-207.
9. Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuda M. Properties of four composite veneering materials polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units. J Oral Rehab/11998; 25(5): 358-64.
10. Gordan VV, Pate/ SB, Barrett AAA, Shen C. Effect of surface fin/sh/ng and storage media on bi-axial flexure strength and microhardness of resin-based composite. Oper Dent2003; 28(5): 560-7.
11. Yap AU, Wong ML, Lim AC. The effect of poiishnng systems on micro/eakage of tooth-coloured restoratives. Part 2: composite and po/yacid-modifed composite resins J Oral Rehab/I 2000; 27(3): 205-10.
12.
Civelek A, Özel E. Işıkla Poiimerize O/an Kompozitlerin Polimerizasyon Derinliği. Akademik Dental Dişhekim/iği Dergisi2004; 6(4): 34-8.
13. Cook WD. Factors affecting the depth of cure of UV-polymerized composites. J Dent Res 1980; 59(5): 800-8.
14. Chung SM, Yap AU. Effects of surface finish on identation modulus and hardness of dental composite restoratives. Dent Mater 2005; 21(11): 1008-16.
15. Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and poiishnng in restorative dentistry. Dent Cinn North Am 1998; 42(4): 613-27.
16. Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utWznng different polishing systems. Oper Dent 1997; 22(6): 260-5.
17. Asmussen E. Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res 1982; 90(6): 484-9.
18. Ferracane JL, Greener EH. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins JBiomed Mater Res 1986; 20(1): 121-31.
19. Ferracane JL, Marker VA. Solvent degradation and reduced fracture toughness in aged composites. J Dent Res 1992; 71(1): 13-9.
20. Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Condon JR. In vitro aging of dental composites in water-effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filer/matrix coupinng. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 42(3): 465¬72.
ERSOY,
ÖZEL, GÖKÇE
21. McKnnney JE, Wu W. Chemical softening and wear of dental composites. J Dent Res 1985; 64(11): 1326-31.
22. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990; 69(10): 1652-8.
23. Okazaki M, Doug/as WH. Comparison of surface layer properties of composite resins by ESCA, SEM and X-ray diffractometry. Biomateria/s 1984; 5(5): 284-8.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com