Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

TME OSTEOARTRİT TUTULUMU OLAN BİREYLERDEKİ GONİAL AÇININ, SAĞLIKLI BİREYLERDEKİ GONİAL AÇI İLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

THE COMPARISON OF THE GONIAL ANGLE BETWEEN THE PATIENTS WITH TMJ OSTEOARTHRITIS AND HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2007
Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Osteoarthritis has been defined as a noninflammatory disorder characterized by progressive deterioration and loss (degeneration) of articular cartilage and subchondral bone accompanied by proliferation of new bone and soft tissue. Many authours have studied craniofacial morphology for exposed the relationship between bite force and gonial angle. The purpose of this study was to investigate to the relation between osteoarthrit and gonial angle.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Osteoartrtt, yumuşak doku ve yeni kemik proifferasyonunun eştik ettiği, subkondral kemik ve eklem kıkırdağının kaybı (dejenerasyonu) ile karakterize nonnnflamatuar brr eklem hastalığıdır. Daha önceden yapılmış olan çalışmalarda yüz morfolojisi He maksimum ısırma kuvveti arasındaki ilişki incelenmiş, gonial açı He ısırma kuvveti arasında brr ilişki olduğu gösterilmiştir. Çalışmamızda da, gonial açı lle osteoartrtt arasındaki Wşknnnn incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-tme-osteoartrit-tutulumu-olan-bireylerdeki-gonial-acinin-saglikli-bireylerdeki-gonial-aci-ile-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 2
20-22
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Israel HA, Diamond B, Saed-Nejad F, Ratcifffe A. Osteoarthritis and synovitis as major pathoses of the temporomandibular joint: Comparison of
YAVUZ, GÜNGÖR, ARAS, YALÇIN
clinical diagnosis with arthroscopic morphology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56(9):1023-8.
2. Kamelchuk LS, Major PW. Degenerative disease of the temporomandibular joint. J Orofacial Pain 1995; 9(2):168-80.
3. Toller PA. Osteoarthrosis of the mandibular condyee. Br Dent J1973; 134(6):223-31.
4. Wright EF. Manual of Temporomandibular Disorders. Iowa: B/ackweli Munksgaard, 2005; Part I:65
5. Stegenga B, de Bont LG, Boering G. Osteoarthrosis as the cause of craniomandbbuaar pain and dysfunction: a unifying concept. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 198; 47(3):249-56.
6. Stegenga B, de Bont LG, Boering G, van Wiliggen JD. Tissue responses to degenerative changes nn the temporomandibular joint: a review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49(10):1079-88.
7. Ingervall B, Minder C. Correlation between maximum btte force and facaal morphology nn chlldren. Angee Orthod1997; 67(6):415-24.
8.
Türker M. ve Yücetaş Ş. Ağız diş çene hasta/ıkları ve cerrahisi At/as KttapçlıkAnkara 1997; 406
9. Sondang P, Kumagai H, Tanaka E, Ozak H, Nkkawa H, Tanne K, Hamada T. Correlation between maximum bite force and craniofacaal morphology of young adults in Indonesia. J Oral Rehabil. 2003; 30(11):1109-17.
10. Xie QF, Ainamo A. Correlation of gonial angle size with cortical thickness, height of the mandibular residual body, and duration of edentutsm. J Prosthet Dent2004; 91(5):477-82.
11. Milam SB. Pathogenesis of degenerative temporomandibular joint arthrttddes. Odontology. 2005; 93(1)77-15.
12. Rtngqvtst, M. Isometric btte force and its relation to dimensions of the facial skeleton. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 1973; 31(1):35-42.
13. Ingervall B, Thilander B.Re/atton between facial morphology and activity of the masticatory muscles. J Oral Rehabll. 1974; 1(2)131-47.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com