Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

DİŞETİ RETRAKSİYON YÖNTEMLERİ

METHODS OF GINGIVAL RETRACTION

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The impression process for fixed prosthodontics requires careful management of the soft tissues. Due to insufficiency of impression materials in displacing soft tissue, adequate isolation is required in impression process. Also some applications are necessary to expose the finish line temporarily during the impression process. Gingival retraction is an appiication which is realized during the impression process to enlarge the gingival sulcus and dilate the soft tissue temporarily. Thus a precise impression can be achieved. In this review, practicability and reliability of gingival retraction methods are discussed
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Sabit protez yapımında ölçü aşamaları, yumuşak dokuların dikkatli bir şekilde kontrolünü gerektirir. Ölçü maddelerinin, yumuşak dokuları, sıvıları veya artıkları uzaklaştırmadaki yetersizliği uygun ya/ıtım yöntemini zorunlu kllar. Ayrıca protez bitim çizgisinin açığa çıkarı/ması için ölçü işlemi sırasında ek uygulamalara gereksinim vardır. Dişeti retraksiyonu, serbest dişeti oluğunun geçici olarak genişletmek ve de serbest dişetinin geçici olarak büzülmesini sağaamak için ölçü işlemi sırasında gerçekleştirilen bir uygulamadır. Prepare dişin net bir ölçüsünün alınması için gereklidir. Bu derlemede, dişeti retraksiyon yöntem/erinin uygulanabiliriiği ve güvenilirliği anlatılmıştır
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-diseti-retraksiyon-yontemleri.pdf
  • 2
78-84
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Shillingburg HT. Fundamental of Fixed Prosthodontics.3 ed Quintessence Publishing Co, London, 1997: 257-77.
2. Benson W, Bomberg TJ, Hatch RA, Hoffman W. Tissue displacement methods in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:175-81.
3. Kamansky FW, Tempel TR, Post AC. Gingival tissue response to rotary curettage. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:380-3.
4. Brady WF. Periodontal and restorative considerations in rotary gingival curettage. J Am Dent Assoc 1982;105:231-6.
5. Ingraham R, Sochat P, Hansing FJ. Rotary gingival curettage - A technique for tooth preparation and management of the gingival sulcus for impression taking. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1981;1:8-33.
6. Devitre R, Galburt RB, ManessWJ. Biometric comparison of bur and electrosurgical retraction methods. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:179-82.
7. Azzi R, Tsao TF, Carranza FA Jr, Kenney EB. Comparative study of gingival retraction methods. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:561-5.
8. Tupac RG, Neacy K. A comparison of cord gingival displacement with the gingitage technique. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:509-15.
9. Gardner FM. Electrosurgery retraction techniques in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent
1981;45:458.
10. Coelho DH, Cavallaro J, Rothschild EA. Gingival recession with electrosurgery for impression making. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:422-6.
11. Noble WH, McClatchey KD, Douglass GD. A histologic comparison of effects of electrosurgical resection using different electrodes. J Prosthet
Dent 1976;35:575.
12. Maness WL, Roeber FW, Clark RE, Cataldo E, Riis D, Haddad AW. Histologic evaluation of electrosurgery with varying frequency and waveform. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:304.
13. Csempesz F, Vag J, Fazekas A. In vitro kinetic study of absorbency of retraction cords. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:45-9.
14. Azzi R, Tsao TF, Carranza FA Jr, Kenney EB. Comparative study of gingival retraction methods. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:561-5.
15. DonovanTE, Gandar BK, Nemetz H. Review and survey of medicaments used with gingival retraction cords. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:525-31.
16. Kumbuloglu O, User A, Toksavul S, Boyacioglu H. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords. Quintessence Int 2007;38:92-8.
17. Csillag M, Nyiri G, Vag J, Fazekas A. Dose-related effects of epinephrine on human gingival blood flow and crevicular fluid production used as a soaking solution for chemo-mechanical tissue retraction. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:6-11.
18. Bader JD, Bonito AJ, Shugars DA. A systematic review of cardiovascular effects of epinephrine on hypertensive dental patients. Oral Surg Oral Med
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:647-53.
19. Kellam S, Smith J, Scheffel SJ. Epinephrine absorption from commercial gingival retraction cords in clinical patients. J Prosthet Dent
1992;68:761-5.
20. Bowles WH, Tardy SJ, Vahadi A. Evaluation of new gingival retraction agents. J Dent Res
1991;70:1447-9.
21. Gennaro GG, Landesman HM, Calhoun JE, Martinoff JT. A comparison of gingival inflammation related to retraction cords. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:384-6.
22. Clarke NG, Shephard BC, Hirsch RS. The effects of intra-arterial epinephrine and nicotine on gingival circulation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
1981;52:577-82.23. Fazekas A, Csempesz F, Csabai Z, Vag J. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin. Oper Dent 2002;27:343-8.
24. Polat NT, Ozdemir AK, Turgut M. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:57-62.
25. Feng J, Aboyoussef H, Weiner S, Singh S, Jandinski J. The effect of gingival retraction procedures on periodontal indices and crevicular fluid cytokine levels: a pilot study. J Prosthodont
2006;15:108-12.
26. Woody RD, Miller A, Staffanou RS. Review of the pH of hemostatic agents used in tissue displacement. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:191-2.
27. Kopac I, Batista U, Cvetko E, Marion L. Viability of fibroblasts in cell culture after treatment with different chemical retraction agents. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:98-104.
28. Kopac I, Sterle M, Marion L. Electron microscopic analysis of the effect of chemical retraction agents on cultured rat keratinocytes. Prosthet Dent
2002;87:51-6.
29. Adams HF. Managing gingival tissues during definitive restorative treatment. Quintessence Int 1981;2:141.
30. Runyan DA, Reddy TG, Shimoda ML. Fluid absorbency of retraction cords after soaking in aluminum chloride solution. J Prosthet Dent
1988;60:676-8.
31. Cloyd S, Puri S.Using the double-cord packing technique of tissue retraction for making crown impressions. Dent Today 1999;18:54-9.
32. Liu CM, Huang FM, Yang LC, Chou LS, Chou MY,
Chang YC. Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. J Oral
Rehabil 2004;31:368-72.
33. Baharav H, Laufer BZ, Langer Y, Cardash HS. The effect of displacement time on gingival crevice width. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:248-53.
34. Laufer BZ, Baharav H, Langer Y, Cardash HS. The closure of the gingival crevice following gingival retraction for impression making. J Oral Rehabil
1997;24:629-35.
35. Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP. Clinical Periodontology and implant dentistry. 4 ed Blackwell Publishing Inc, Oxford, 2003: 21-22.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com