Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

INTRAORAL DİJİTAL GÖRÜNTÜLEME SİSTEMLERİ

INTRAORAL DIGITAL IMAGING SYSTEMS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Radiographs are the most accurate diagnostic aid available for the detection of maxillofacial abnormalities and follow up of dental disease. Digital radiography is the latest advancement in dental imaging system and because it has many advantages over the conventional film, the system is becoming increasingly popular in dentistry. As use of digital radiography becomes more common, many dentists face with some problems and questions that must be answered during their transition from the conventional system to a digital system. The aim of this review article was to discuss the principles of digital imaging including: direct and semi-direct digital imaging modalities, as well as a variety of factors that general practitioners should consider when purchasing digital imaging system.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Radyografiler, maksillofasiyel anomalilerin tanısında ve dental hastalıkların izlenmesinde kullanılan en önemli gereçlerdir. Dijital radyografi dental görüntüleme alanındaki en son gelişme olup, konvansiyonel film ile karşılaştırıldığında sağladığı avantajlar nedeniyle dişhekimleri arasında giderek yaygınlaşan bir yöntem olmaya başlamıştır. Dijital radyografinin kullanılırlığı arttıkça, dişhekimleri konvansiyonel yöntemden dijital görüntüleme sistemine geçişte bazı problemler ve cevaplanması gereken sorularla karşılaşmışlardır. Bu derlemenin amacı, dijital radyografinin temel prensiplerini irdelemek, direkt ve yarı-direkt dijital görüntüleme sistemleri hakkında bilgi vermek ve dişhekimlerinin herhangi bir dijital sistemin satın alımı öncesinde değerlendirmeleri gereken kriterleri belirlemektir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-intraoral-dijital-goruntuleme-sistemleri.pdf
  • 3
249-254
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Farma
n AG, Farman TT.A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 99: 485-489.
2. Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Bosmans H. Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice. Eur
Radiol. 2010; 20: 2637-2655.
3. Wakoh M, Kuroyanagi K. Digital imaging modalities for dental practice. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2001; 42: 1-14.
4. van der Stelt PF. Principles of digital imaging. Dent
Clin North Am 2000; 44: 237-248.
5. Mouyen F, Benz C, Sonnabend E, Lodter JP. Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 68: 238-242.
6. Sanderink GC, Miles DA. Intraoral detectors. CCD, CMOS, TFT, and other devices. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 249-255.
7. Wenzel A, M0ystad A. Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010; 68: 106-14.
8. Parks ET. Digital radiographic imaging: is the dental practice ready? J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139:
477-481.
9. Paurazas SB, Geist JR, Pink FE, Hoen MM, Steiman HR. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod 2000; 89: 356-362.
10. Kitagawa H, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality. Dentomaxillofac
Radiol 2003; 32: 408-411.
11. Farman AG, Levato CM, Gane D, Scarfe WC. In practice: how going digital will affect the dental office. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139 Suppl: 14S-19S.
12. van der Stelt PF. Filmless imaging. The uses of digital radiography in dental practice. J Am Dent
Assoc 2005; 136: 1379-87.
13. Tsuchida R, Araki K, Endo A, Funahashi I, Okano T. Physical properties and ease of operation of a wireless intraoral x-ray sensor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 100: 603-8.
14. http://www.gendex-dental.com/Default.aspx?navid=562214&oid=201& lid=En
15. Parks ET, Williamson GF. Digital radiography: an overview. J Contemp Dent Pract 2002; 3: 23-39.
16. Borg E, Attaelmanan A, Gröndahl HG. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 70-75.
17. http://airforcemedicine.afms.mil/idc/groups/public/ documents/afms/ctb_109171.pdf
18. http://www.soredex.com/products/intraoral-imaging/classic-digora-optime....
19. Miles DA. Imaging using solid-state detectors. Dent
Clin North Am 1993; 37: 531-540.
20. Lim KF, Loh EE-M,Hong HY. Quantitative assessment of a new intra-oral digital imaging system. J Dent Res 1995; 74 (Abstract): 463.
21. http://www.soredex.com/pdf/Digora_optime_tech.
pdf
22. van der Stelt PF. Better imaging: the advantages of digital radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139;
7S-13S.
23. Koch S, Wagner IV, Schneider W. Effective and quality- controlled use of digital radiography in dental practice. Int J Comput Dent 2000; 3(2):
107-118.
24. Bhaskaran V, Qualtrough AJ, Rushton VE, Worthington HV, Horner K. A laboratory comparison of three imaging systems for image quality and radiation exposure characteristics. Int
Endod J 2005; 38: 645-52.
25. Berkhout WE, Beuger DA, Sanderink GCH, van der Stelt PF. The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 1-5.
26. http://www.cliniciansreport.org/additional_study/2 005/05-02/comparison-chart.pdf
27. http://www.cliniciansreport.org/additional_study/2 005/05-02/resolution.htm
28. http://www.aadmrt.com/static.aspx?content=curre nts/farman_spring_04
29. Berkhout E, Sanderink G, van der Stelt P. Digital intra-oral radiography in dentistry. Diagnostic efficacy and dose considerations. Oral Radiology
2003; 19: 1-13.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com