Buradasınız

ÜÇ YENİ NESİL DENTIN BONDING SİSTEMİNİN KESME KUVVETLERİNE KARŞI OLAN DİRENÇLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

THE EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTHS OF THREE NEW GENERATION DENTINAL BONDING SYSTEMS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
!n this study, the shearbond strength values of three dentin bonding systems were evaluated in vitro. For the shear bond test, composite blocks mounted on the buccal surfaces of 60 sound human teeth were stored in 37 °C water for 24 hours and then tested m a testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0-5 mrnVmin. The values were calculated as MPa. The results were analyzed statistically by using variance analysis method and Duncan test. The best results were obtained from Scotchbond-2 and Tenure systems. It was found that the bond strength to dentin jas very tow in the control group which had no dentinal bonding system.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada üç dentin bonding sisteminin dentine bağlanma dayanımları invitro olarak incelenmiştir. Bağlantı A „1(™.,„ ;A^.r j ^Xlm .^.-.! ,-lı ı-ı r, kııl-L-çıl ıriiiM-ino UtlIV} LIIV-L CLiLiuıj auv L jogıuıu ııııııut uı;ıı. uuı.„uj j i ıııv hazırlanan kompovit bloklar 37 °C suda 24 saat bekledikten sonra 0.5 mm./ dak. jük lıız: ite test cihazında kesme kuvvetine maruz bırakılmışlardır. Bulunan değerler MPa cinsinden hesaplanmış, sonuçlar varyans analizi ve Duncan testine göre istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmişlerdir. Bonding sistemleri arasında Scotchbond- 2 ve Tenure denting bonding sistemlerinden en iyi netice alındığı, bonding kullanılmayan kontrol grubunda ise tutuculuğun çok düşük olduğu görulmüştür-
19-22

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Bordin AS, Selton J, Davies EH. In vitro bond strength of three current dentin adhesive* to primary and permanent teeth. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 74-8.
2. Council on denial materials. Instruments and Equipment. Dentin Bonding Systems; An update. J ADA 1967; 114: 91-4.
3. Erickson RL. Surface interactions of dentin adhesive materials. Opcr Dent 1992; (Snppl.5); 81-94.
4. Jendresen MD, Allen EP, Klooster J, McNeill C, Philips RW, Preston JD. Report of the committee on scientific investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 84-131.
5. Kemper RN, Klllian RS, New system fon tensile bond strength testing. J Dent Res. 1976; 558: fl 138 (abstr.No: 308).
6. Obrien JA, Retief DH, Bradley EL. Denys FR. Shear bond strength of a new dentin bonding restorative system Dent Mater 1988; 4: 179- 83.
7. Retief DH. Bastos PAM, Bradley EL- Denys FR. Shear bond strength of Scotchbond-2/Silux to dentin. Am J Dent 1988; 1: 245-53.
8. Retief DH, Obrien JA, Smith LA, Marchman SL. In vitro investigation and evaluation of dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1988; Imperial issue): 176-83.
9. Retief DH, Denys FR. Adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1989; 2: 133-44.
10. Retief DH, Wendt SL, Bradley EL, Denys FR. The effect of storage media and duration of storage of extracted teeth of the shear bond strength of Scothbond-2 l$i\ux to dentine. Am J Dent 1989; 2: 269-73.
11. Retief DH, Mandras RS, Smith LA, Marchman JL, Bradley EL, Russel CM. Shear bond stregths of the Tenure dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1990; 3: 138-42.
12. Retief DH, Standardising laboratory adhesion tests. Am J Dent 1991; 4; 231-6.
13. Soderhoim JM. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials. Dent Mater 3991:7:74-83.
14. Strickland SS, Relief DH, Russel CM, Denys FR. Gluma shear bond stregth to enamel and dentine treated with pyruvic acid and glycine. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 97-102.
15. Tannverdi F. Dentin bonding
sistemlerini
n in vivo ve in vitro olarak incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi; M.Ü.Sağlık Bilimleri Em.İstanbul, 1991; 53.
16. Tyas MJ, Bums GA. Byrne PF, Cunningham PJ. Dobsan BC, Widdob FT Clinical evaluation of Scotchbond: One year results. Aust Dent J 1986; 3!: 159-64.
17. Tyas MJ. Three year clinical evaluation of dentin bonding agents. Aust Dent J 1991; 36: 298-301.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com