Buradasınız

DİREK DİJİTAL RADYOGRAFİ (DDR)

DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
A direct digital radiography (DDR) is a computerized system in which an intraoral sensor sensitive to X-rays is used, which contains a printer and a monitor, needs less dosage when compared with classifies! films and eliminate developing process. It is possible by means of these tehniques to enhance the contrast, to color, totake the negative (inverse image), to measure the images obtained and to observe the desired region of the image by magnifying due to its "zoom" mode. There are various intraoral DDR systems produced under different names by different companies. In the studies conservative, endodonty, surgery, pcriodontology and implantation fields, performed comparatively between these systems and conventional Lehniques, similar result have been obtained. For this reason, taking the advantagesinto account, these systems seem to have the characteristics to replace the conventional techniques in future.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Direk dijital radyografi (DDR), X ışınına hassas bir intraoral sensor kullanılan, bir printer vc bir monitör ihtiva eden, klasik filmlerte mukayese edildiğinde daha az doz gerektiren ve banyo işlemini ortadan kaldıran bilgisayarlı bir sistemdir. Bu tekniklerle alınan imajların kontrastını ayarlamak, renklendirmek, negatifini almak, ölçüm yapmak ve "zoom" modu sayesinde görüntünün istenilen bölgesini büyütüp incelemek mümkündür. Dünyada değişik tırmalar tarafından değişik isimler altında üretilen çeşitli intraoral DDR sistemleri mevcuttur. Bu sistemlerle konvansiyonel teknikler arasında konservatif, endodonLi, cerrahi, periodontoloji ve implantoloji alanında karşılaştırmalı olarak yapılan çalışmalarda birbirine yakm sonuçlar elde edilmiştir. Bu nedenle avantajlanda göz önüne alındığında bu sistemler gelecekte konvansiyonel tekniklerin yerini alabilecek özellikte görünmektedir.
100-104

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Ardct Dental Lynx- Brochure, Arde srl, Buccinasco, Italy.
2. Farman AG Avant SL, Scarfe WC, Green DR. In vivo comparison of the VIXA-2 and Ektaspeed Plus Radiographs for the assessment of periapical lesion dimensions. Abstrcts> Fifth European Congress on Dental and Maxillo-Facial Radiology, Cologna, Germany, 1995, "As Quated" Kuliendorff B, Nilsson M, Rohlin M. Diagnostic Accuracy of Direct Digital Dental Radiography for the Detection of Periapical Bone Lesions. I Overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 19%; 82: 344-350¬3. Furkart AJ, Dove SB, McDavid WD,
Nummikoski P, Matteson S. Direct Digital Radiography for the Detection of Periodontal Bone Lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74; 652-60.
4. Hedrick RT, Dove SB, Peters DD. McDavid WD. Radiographic Determination of Canal Length: Direct Digital Radiography Versus Conventional Radiography. J Endodon 1994; 20(7): 320-326.
5- Horner K, Shearer AC, Walker A. Wilson NHF. Radiovisiography: An initial evaluation. Br Dent J 1990; 168: 244-248.
6. Hubar JSr Hing LR, Heaven T. COMMRAD: Computerized Radiographic Differentia] Diagnosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 69: 263-65.
7. Kuliendorff B, Nilsson M, Rohlin M, Diagnostic Accuracy of Direct Digilal Dental Radiography for the Detection of Periapical Bone Lesions. Overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82: 344-350.
8. Leddy BJ, Miles DA, Newton CW, Brown CE. Interpretation of Endodontic File lights Using Radio VisioGraphy. Journal of Endodontics 1994; 20 (II): 542-545.
9. McDonncl D, Price C. An Evaluation of the Sens A-Ray Digital Dental Imaging Sysrem. Dentomaxillofac Radio! 1993; 22: 121-126. "As Quated1' Kuliendorff B, Nilsson M, Rohlin M. Diagnostic Accuracy of Direct Digital Dental Radiography for the Detection of Periapical Bone Lesions. Overall comparison between conventional an direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod I996;82: 344-350.
10. Miles DA. Imaging Using Solid-State Detectors. Dental Clinics of North America. 1993; 37 (4); 531-540.
103
Atatürk (jniv.Diş HckFakDcrg. Ci!t:8, Sayırl, Sayfa: 100-104,1998
AKGÜL, YILMAZ
J
1. Mofteni R- Direct Digital Dental X-Ray Imaging with Vi suali x/VIXA. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76: 235-243.
L2. Mouyen F, Benz C. Sonnabcnd E, Lodter JP. Presentation and Physical Evaluation of Radio VisioGraphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathoi 1989; 68: 238-242.
13. Nelvig P, Wing K, Welander U, Scns-A-Ray. A New System for Direct Digital Intraoral Radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74: 818-823.
14. Ong EY, Ford TRP. Comparison of Radiovjsiography with Radiographic Film in Root Length Determination. International Endodontic Journal 1995; 28: 25-29.
15. Parks ET, Miles DA. Van Dis ML, Williamson GF, Razmus TP, Bricker SL. Effects of fillrasyon, collimation, and target-receptor distance on artificial approxirnal enamel lesion detection with the use of RadioVisioGraphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77: 419-26.
16. Pass B. Furkart AJ, Dove SB. McDavid WD, Gregson PH. 6-bit and 8-bit digital radiography for detecting simulated periodontal lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77; 406-1 L
17. Sanderink GCH, Huiskens R, van der Stelt PF, Welander US, Stheeman SE. Image Quality of Direct Digital Intraoral X-Ray Sensors in Assessing Root Canal Length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Hash Dent Compared with Ektaspeed Films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 78: 125-132.
18. Searfe WC, Fana CR, Farman AG. Radiographic Detection of Accessory/Lateral Canals: Use of RadioVisioGraphy and Hypaque. Journal of Endodontics 1995; 21(4): 185-190.
19. Searfe WC, Farman AG, Kelly MS. Hash Dent: an Alternative Charge-Coupled Pevice/Scintillalor-Based Direct Digital Intraoral Radiographic System. Dentomasillöfac Radiol 1994; 23:11-17. "As Quated" Kuliendorff B, Nilsson M. Rohlin M, Diagnostic Accuracy of Direct Digital Dental Radiography for the Detection of Periapical Bone Lesions. Overall comparison between conventional an direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82: 344-350.
20. Shearer AC, Horner K, Wilson NHF. Radiovisiography For Imaging Root CanaSs: an in Vitro Comparison with Conventional Radiography. Quintessence International 1990; 21(10): 789-794.
21. Shrout MK, Hall JM, Hildebolt CE. Differentiation of periapical granulamas and radicular cysts by digital radiometric analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76: 356-61.
22. Siegel MA, FirrioSo FJ, Finkelstetn MW. Computer applications in oral diagnosis. The Dental Clinics of North America 1993; 37(1): 113-31.
23. Walker A, Horner K, Czajka JT Shearer AC, Wilson NHF. Quantitative assessment of na new dental imaging system. F3r J Radiol 1991; 64: 529-36.
24. Wclander U, Nelvig P, Trorıje G, McDavid WD, Dove SB, Mömer AC, Cederlund T. Basic Technical Properties of a System for Direct Acquisition of Digital Intraoral Radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 75: 506-516.
25. Wen/el A, Hrntze H, Mikkelsen L, Mouyen F. Radiographic Detection of Occlusal Caries in non Cavitated Teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 72:621-626.
26. Wcnzel A, Pitts N, VerdonschoL EH, Kalsbeek H- Developments in radiographics carles diagnosis. J Dent 1993; 21: İ31-140, 'As Quated"Parks ET, Miles DA, Van Dis ML, Williamson GF, Razmus TF, Bricker SL. Effects of fdtrasyon, collimation, and target-receptor distance on artificial approximal enamel lesion detection with the use of RadioVisioGraphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77: 419-26.
27. Yokota ET, Miles AD, Newton CW, Brown CE. Interpretation of Periapical Lesions Using RadioVisioGraphy. Journal of Endodontics 1994; 20(10): 490-494.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com