Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

SUT DİŞLERİNDE UYGULANAN AÇIK VE KAPALI SANDVİÇ TEKNİĞİNDE SIZINTININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

AN IN-VITRO INVESTIGATIO N OF MICHOLEAKAGE FOR OPEN AND CLOSED SANDWICH TECHNIQUE THAT USED IN PRIMARY TEETH

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1998

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
There were a few studies in the treatment of the primary teeth in which different types of sandwich technique were used uncommonly. In this study- the different lehniques were evaluated by the aspect of raicroleakage as in vitro; and then 32 extracted primary molar teeth were used. Class IT cavities were prepared on these teeth buL half of these cavities were finished on the enamcl-ccmcnt junction. Glass-ionomer and posterior composite resin were used for cavities in the enamel and enamel-cement junction. The values of gap and micro-leakage among fillings were found and the data were analysed wsing the Variance and Kruska! analysis. Differences among the groups were statistically significant. In the restorations ended an enamel-cement junction the leakage values were less considerably found in the open sandwich groups. These results show that the sandwich technique which wasn't recommended in the permanent teeth could be practised in the primary teeth.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Süt dişlerinde çok az sayLda çalışma hulunan sandviç tekniğinin farklı uygulamalarının, invitro olarak değerlendirilmesi amacıyla bu çalışma yapılmıştır, Çekilmiş otuziki adet süt molar dişlerin yarısına minede sonlanan, diğer yarısına da minc-sement sınırında sonlanan ILsınıf kaviteler açılmıştır. Mine ve mı ne-sement gruplarındaki kavitelere, cam-iyonomer ve posterior kompozit resin kullanılarak açık vç kapalı sandviç restorasyonlar yapılmıştır. DolguJar arasındaki açıklık vc sızıntı değerleri ölçülmüştür. Elde edilen verilere varyans ve Kruskal Wallis analizleri uygulanmıştır. Gruplar arasında i slali.sli k.sef olarak Çuk önemli farklılıklar gö/lenmiş olup, mine-sementte sonlanan restorasyonlardan açık sandviç grubunda, sızıntı değerleri belirgin olarak daha az bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar daimi dişlerde tavsiye edilmeyen sandviç tekniğinin siiL dişlerinde başarıyla kullanılabileceğini düşündürmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-sut-dislerinde-uygulanan-acik-kapali-sandvic-tekniginde-sizintinin-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 1
44-49
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Asmııssen E. The effect temperature changes an adaptation of resin fillings, LActa. Odontol Scand 1974; 32: 161-71.
2. Buonacore MG, Matsui A, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol 1968; 13: fil -70.
3.
Dunılür
k L. Servikal kompozit resin dolgularda gingival kenar sızıntısının önlenmesi. Ankara Üniv Diş Hek FakDerg 1988; 15: 87-91.
4. Fisbein S, Holan G, Grojower R, Fuks AB. The effect of VLC Scotchbond and an incremental Filling technique on leakage around class 11 composite restorations. J Dent Child 1988; 55: 29-33.
5. Forsten L. Fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res 3977; 85: 503-4.
6. Forsten L. Clinical experience with glass ionomer for proximal fillings. Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51: 195-200.
7. Fuks AB, Grajower R, Koenigsberg S. Filling techniques for posterior composites (Abstract), J Dent Res 1988; 67: 712.
8. Godoy FG, Malone WFP, Microleakage of posterior composite resins using glass ionomer cement bases. Quint Int 1988; 19: 13-17.
9. Gordon M, Piaschaert AJM, Soelberg KB et al. Mikroleakage of four composite resins over a glass ionomer cement base in class V restorations. Quint Int 1985; 17:817-820,
10. Guelmann M, Fuks AB, Grajower R, Holan G. Marginal leakage of class II glass kmomcr-silver restorations with and without a posterior composite covarage (Abstract) J Dent Res 1988; 67: 714.
1 I. Gwinnett AJ. The ultras tructure of "prismless" enamel of permanent human teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1967; 12: 381-388.
12. Hembrcc JH JR, Andrews JT. Microleakage nf several Class V anterior restorative materials: a laboratory study. J Am Dent Assoc 1978; 97: 179-183.
13. Hirschfield Z. Frankc! A, Zyskind D, Fuks A. Marginal leakage of class II glass ionomer-composite resin restorations: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1992;; 67: 148-153¬14. Holan G, Fuks AB, Grajower R, Chosack A. In
vitro assessment of the effect of Scotchbond on the marginal leakage of class II composite restorations in primary molars. J Dent Child 1986; 53: 188-192.
15. Hotz P. McLean JW, Seed 1, Wilson AD. The bonding of glass ionomer cements to metal and tooth substrates. Br Dent J 1977; 142: 41-47.
16. Jenkins CBG. A comparison of bond strength of glass ionomer cements and acid etch resin systems (Abstract). J Dent Res 1976; 55: D.l 34.
17.
Karta
l ' M, Bilimsel araştırmalarda hipotez lestleri, parametrik ve nonparametrik teknikler. Atatürk Üniv İ 1 B F Yayını (176), Doğu Ofset Matbaacılık, Erzurum 1993: 183-188.
18- Kidd EAM. Cavity sealing ability of composite and glass ionomer cement restorations. Br Dent J 1978; 144: 139-142.
19. Killman J, Freers M. Kilnische studie zur restoration von milchzâhnen mit einem glasionomerzement im vergieich 24 einem amalgam, Dtsch Zahnarztl 1984; 39:
33-35.
48
Atatürk Üniv .Diş Hek.Fak.Derg.
Cilt:8, Sayul, Sayfa:44-49,1998
KIRZIOĞLU, SEVEN DEMİRTUĞOGLU
20. Knibbs PJ. Glass ionomer cement 10 years of clinical use. J Oral Rehabil 1988; 103-115.
21. Koenigsberg S, Fuks A, Grajower R. The effect of three filling techniques on marginal leakage ground Class II composite resin restorations in vitro. Quint Int 1989; 20: 117-121.
22. Maldonado A, Swartz M, Phillips RW. An invilro study of certain properties of a glass ionomer cement. J Am Dent Assoc 1978; 96: 785-791.
23. Mc Lean JW, Alternatives lû amalgam alloys. 1 .Br Dent 1984; 157: 432-433.
24. Mc Lean JW, Powis GR, Prossen HJ et al. The use glass ionomer cements in bonding composite resins in dentine. Br Dent J 1985; 158; 410-414.
25. Miichen JC, Turner LR. The retentive strength of acid etch resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1974; 89: 1107-1110.
26. Mount GJ. Restoration with glass ionomer cement requirements for clinical success , Oper Dent 1981; 6: 59 65.
27. Mount GJ, Longevity of glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 6S2-685.
28- Murray GA, Yaies JL. A comparison of the bond strengths of composite resins and glass ionomer cements. J Pedod 1984; 8; 172-177.
29. Orly. RF, Phillips RW, Swartz ML et al. Effect of composite resin bond agent on mieroleakage and bond strength, J Prosthet Dent 1979; 41; 51 57.
30. Parvis DR. et al, Improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentine and enamel, J Dent Res 1982; 61: 1416-1422.
31. Plant CO, Shovelton DS, Vliestra JR, et al. The use of a glass ionomer cement in deciduous teeth. Br Dent j 1977; 271-274.
32. Powis DR, Folleras T, Mcrson SA, Wilson AD. Improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel. J Dent Res 1982; 61: 1416-1422.
33. Reid IS, Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Williams CECS. An in-vitrn investigation of mieroleakage and gap site of glass ionomer composite resin "Sandwich" restorations in primary teeth. J Dent Child 1994; 61: 255-259.
34. Relief DH, Woods R, Jamison HC, Effect of cavosurface treatment on marginal leakage in class V composite resin restorations. J Prosthel Dent 1982; 47: 496-501.
35. Tobias RS, Browne RM, Plant CG, Ingram DV. Pulpal response to a glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1978; 144: 345-350,
36. Varpio M. Proximooclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a six-year follow-up, J Dent Child 1985; 52: 435-440.
37. Walls AWG. Glass polyalkenoale (glass ionomer) cements; A review. J Dent 1986; 14: 231 236.
38. Welbury RR, Murray JJ. A clinical trial of the glass ionomer cement composite resin "sandwich" technique in Class 2 cavities in permanent premolar and molar teeth. Quint Inl 1990; 21: 507-512.
39. Welbury RR. Walls AWG, Murray JJ, et al. The 5 year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkcnoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1991; 170: 177-181.
40. Welsh EL, Hcmbree JH Jr. Mieroleakage at the gingival wall with Four class V anterior restorative materials. J lVosthet Dent 1985; 54: 370-373.
41. Williams JA, Bilington RW. Increase in compressive strength of glass ionomer restorative'materials with respect to time: a guide to their suitability for use in posterior primary dentition. J Oral Rehabil 1989; 16: 475^79.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com