Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

DEĞİŞİK pH ORTAMLARINDA CAM İONOMER SIMANLARIN ÇOZUNURLUGU

THE SOLUBILITY OF GLASS İONOMER CEMENTS AT VARIOUS pH MEDIUM

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1999

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The solubility of luting, lining and base cements at 4 different pH values with various time intervals was studied. In this study, 6 commercial dental cements were used and 3 parallel experiments were run. It has been observed that cements were more soluble in alkaline medium. The cements were stabile in pH 6 and 8 buffer solutions. The difference between dental cements are determined with using ANOVA test
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Yapıştırma, astar ve kaide maddesi olarak kullanılan cam ionomer simanların çeşitli sürelerde ve 4 farklı pH ortamında çözünürlükleri araştırıldı. Çalışmada 6 ticari dental siman kullanıldı. Her pH değeri için 3 örnek hazırlandı. Simanların alkali ve asit ortamda daha fazla çözündükleri, çözünürlüğün alkali ortamda asit ortama oranla daha fazla olduğu, en stabil oldukları ortamın pH 6 ve pH 8 olduğu gözlendi. Dental simanlar arası farklılık ANOVA testi ile belirlendi.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-degisik-ph-ortamlarinda-cam-ionomer-simanlarin-cozunurlugu.pdf
  • 1
15-20
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Anderson JN. Applied dental materials.5th Edition London: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1977.
2. Barnes DM, Blank LW. A clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. JADA, 1995; 126: 1245,-1253.
3. Burgess J, Norling B, Summit J. Resin ionomer restorative materials: The nejvv generation. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6: 207-215.
4. Charlton DG, Moore BK, SWartz ML. Direct surface pH determinations of setting cements. Oper Dent, 1991; 16: 231-238.
5. Craig RG. restorative dental materials. 9th Edition, St Louis: Mosby, 1993.
6.
Denl
i N, Eskitaşçıoğlu M. Çeşitli simanların pH değişimi. A Ü Diş Hek Fak Derg 1990; 17(1): 57-60.
7. Mitchem JC, Coronas DG. Clinical evaluation of cement solubility. J PRosthet Dent §978; 40(4): 453-456.
8. Mount GJ. Some physical and biological properties of glass ionomer cement. Int Dent J, 1995; 45: 135-140.
9. Osborne JW, Svvartz ML, Goodacre CJ, Ralph WP, Elliot NG. A method for assesing the clinical solubility and disintegration of luting cements. J Prosthet Dent, 1978; 40(4): 413-417.
10. Rafael LB, William AM. Dental Composites/ Glass Ionomers: The materials. Adv Dent Res, 1992; 6:44-49.
11. Sim TPC, Sidhu SK. The effect of dentinal conditioning on light-activated glass- ionomer cement. Quintessence Int, 1994; 25(7): 506-508.
12. Smith DC. Composition and characteristicsof glass ionomer cement. JADA, 1990; 120: 19-22.
13. Swartz ML, Sears C, Phillips RW. Solubility of cement as related to time of exposure in water. J Prosthet Dent, 1971; 26: 501-505.
14. Swift EJ. An update on glass ionomer cements. Quintessence Int, 1988; 19(2): 125-129.
15. Tobias RS, Browne RM, Plant CG, Williams JA. Pulpal response to two semihydrous glass ionomer luting cements. Int Endo J, 1991; 24: 95-107.
16. Walls AWG, Mc Cabe .IF, Murray J.I. The effect of the variation in pH of the eroding solution upon the erosion resistance of glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements. Br Dent J, 1988; 164: 141-144.
17. Williams JA, Billington RW, Pearson GI. The effect of maturation on in-vitro erosion of glass-ionomer and other dental cements. Br Dent J, 1992; 173:340-342.
18.
Zaimoğl
u A, Can G, Ersoy E, Aksu L. Dişhekimliğinde maddeler bilgisi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, 1993.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com