Buradasınız

ERZURUM VE ÇEVRESİNDEKİ DİŞHEKİMLERINIJN IMPLANTOLOJİYE YAKLAŞIMI

THE ATTITUDE OF DENTISTS IN EKZURUM PROVINCE TO IMPLANTOLOGY

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
The present study was planned to determine the attitude of dentists in Brzurum pravince to implantology having been applied rontinly in certain regions of the world and our country. In this study, 22 questions about implantology were asked to 143 dentists who were vvarking in dill eren t health services in Erzurum province. The dalia were s-tatiscally invasligated. At the resul! of the evaluations according to the graduation years of die subjects and the clinics they worked, significant individual differences were found in diagnosis and treatment and implant planning. In conclusion, this study has shown that, regional discussion and formation centers should be established so that all die dentists could maintain standardisation in diagnosis and treatment planning.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Hu çalışma,dünyada ve ülkemizin birçok bölgesinde rutin uygulama alanı bulan implant uygulamaları ile ilgili, ilimiz vc çevresi dişhckimlerinin yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi amacı ile planlandı. Bu çalışmada, Erzurum ve çevresindeki değişik sağlık servislerinde çalışan 143 dişhekiminc implantolojiyle ilgili 22 adet soru soruldu. 01de edilen veriler istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi, Diş, hekimlerin in mezuniyet, yıllan ve çalımlıkları kurumlar dikkate alınarak yapılan değerlendirmelerde, implant planlama, teşhis vc tedavi yaklaşımlar] arasında anlamlı farklılıklar hulundu. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma, bölgesel tartışma ve bilgi alına, merkezlerinin kurulması ve böylece teşhi.s tedavi planlamasında standard! zasyona gidilmesi gerekliliğini göstermiştin
1-4

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockier b, Branemark PI. A 15 year study of osseointegred implants in the treatment of the edentulous Jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10: 387-416.
2. Albrektsonn T. La reponse osseuse. In: Brenamark PI, Albrektsonn T, Zarb G. Protheses osteo- Integree Paris: Edition Cdp. 1986; 129:143.
3. Albrektsonn T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Ericsson A. The long term efficacy of currently used dental implants. J Oral and Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11-25.
4. Babbush CA. Dental implants: Principles and practice. Philadelphia, Saunders 1991.
5. Bhaskar SN. Orban oral histology and embryology. St Louis 9th ed CV Mosby Co 1993: 123-155.
6. Brenamark PI. Introduction to osseointegration.In: Brenamark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsonn T. eds. Tissue-Integrated Protheses. Osteointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago, Quintessence Publishing Co, 1985: 11-14.
7. Brenamark PI, Albrektsonn T, Zarb G. Protheses osteo-integrees. 2rd ed. Paris Edition cdp 1986; 7-76, 199-210.
8. Bruggenkate CM, Kvvast WAM, Osterberk HS. Success criteria in oral implantology A review of literature. Int J Oral Implant 1990; 7: 45.
9. Flemmig TF, Berwick Newman MG, Kenney EB, Beumer J, Nachnani S, Nep R. Effects des recalls auf die subgingival mikroflora von osseointegrierten implantaten. 2 Zahnaerztl Implantol 1990; VI: 45-51.
10. Lekholm U, Zarb G. Selection et preparasyon du patient. In: Brenemark PI, Albrektsonn T, Zarb G. Protheses osteo-integrees. Paris: edition cdp, 1988: 199-210.
11. Lentrodt J. Die entwiclung der implantologie bis heute. Dtsch Zahnaerti. 1983: 38-77.
12. Misch CE. Contemporaray implant dentistry. St Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1993: 123-155.
13. Özdemir T, Anıl A, Sandallı P. Oral implantolojide rutin kontroller. Oral Imp Derg 1994; 1: 57-62.
14. Tetsch P. Enosale implantation in der zhanheilkunde. Carl Hanser Verlog, München-Wien 1992.
15. Yalçın S, Demirel K, Sandallı P. The effects of different oral hygiene intruments on oral implants. Oral Imp Derg 1995:49-54.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com