Öğretmen Adaylarının Dijital Yerli Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi (Bartın Üniversitesi Örneği)

Baran, B., ve Ata, F. (2013). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Web 2.0 Teknolojileri Kullanma
Durumları, Beceri Düzeyleri ve Eğitsel Olarak Faydalanma Durumları. Eğitim ve Bilim,
38(169), s. 192-208.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., ve Kervin, L. (2008). The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the
evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), s. 775-786.
Brown, J. (2002). Growing Up Digital: How the Web Changes Work, Education, and the Ways
People Learn. The United States Distance Learning Online Journal, 16(2).
Bullen, M., Morgan, T., ve Qayyum, A. (2011). Digital Learners in Higher Education: Generation
is Not the Issue. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(1).
Caruso, J., ve Kvavik, R. (2005). ECAR Sturdy of Students and Information Technology, 2005:
Convenience, Connection, Control, and Learning. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied
Research, 6.
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research (4 b.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Dede, C. (2005). Planning for Neomillennial Learning Styles: Implications for Investments in
Technology and Faculty. D. Oblinger, & J. Oblinger içinde, Educating the Net
Generation. EDUCAUSE Transforming Educationa Through Information Technologies.
Gömleksiz, M., ve Koç, A. (2010). Bilgisayar Okuryazarlığı Becerisi Ediniminde E-Portfolyo
Sürecinin Öğrenen Performansına ve Tutumlarına Etkisi. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi
Dergisi, 12(2), s. 75-96.
Günther, J. (2007). Digital Natives & Digital Immigrants. Hamburg: Studienverlag.
Günüç, S. (2011). Dijital Yerlilerde Çalışan Bellek ve Çoklu Görev. 5th International Computer &
Instructional Technologies Symposium. Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ.
51 Öğretmen Adaylarının Dijital Yerli Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi
Barış ÇUKURBAŞI - Aytekin İŞMAN
Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt 3, Sayı 1, s. 28 - 54, Yaz 2014, BARTIN – TÜRKİYE
Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education Volume 3, Issue 1, p. 28 - 54, Summer 2014, BARTIN – TURKEY
Helsper, E., ve Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: where is the evidence? British Educational
Research Journal, 36(3), s. 503-520.
Jukes, I., ve Dosaj, A. (2006). Understanding Digital Children (DKs): Teaching & Learning in the
New Digital Landscape. 11 11, 2013 tarihinde Educational Origami:
http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/file/view/Jukes+-+Understanding+Digital+...
adresinden alındı
Kaiser Family Foundation. (2003). New study finds children age zero to six spend as much time
with TV, computers, and video games as playing outside. 12 10, 2013 tarihinde Kaiser
Family Foundation: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/entmedia102803nr.cfm adresinden
alındı
Kakırman Yıldız, A. (2012). Dijital Yerliler Gerçekten Yerli Mi Yoksa Dijital Melez Mi? The Journal
of Academic Social Science Studies, 5(7), s. 819-833.
Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi (19 b.). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Gray, K., Waycott, J., Judd, T., . . . Chang, R. (2009).
Educating The Net Generation: A Handbook of Findings for Practice and Policy. San
Francisco: Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Australia
Licence.
Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Churchward, A., Gray, K., ve Krause, K. (2008). First year students'
experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of
Educational Technology, 24(1), s. 108-122.
Koutropoulos, A. (2011). Digital Natives: Ten Years After. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning
and Teaching, 7(4).
Lane, C., ve Yamashiro, G. (2008). Assessing Learning and Scholarly Technologies: Lessons from
an Institutional Survey. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(3), s. 18-26.
Lei, J. (2009). Digital Natives As Preservice Teachers: What Technology Preparation Is Needed?
Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(3), s. 87-97.
Lohnes, S., ve Kinzer, C. (2007). Questioning Assumptions about Students' Expectations for
Technology in College Crassrooms. Journal of Online Education, 3(5).
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University
students' use ıf digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56, s. 429-440.
Oh, E., ve Reeves, T. (2014). Generational Differences and the Integration of Technology in
Learning, Instruction, and Performance. J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishops
içinde, Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (4 b., s.
819-828). New York: Springer Science+Busiiness Media.
Öksüz, C., ve Ak, Ş. (2009). Öğretmen Adaylarının İlköğretim Matematik Öğretiminde Teknoloji
Kullanımına İlişkin Algıları. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), s. 1-
19.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On The Horizon, 9(5).
Prensky, M. (2004). The Emerging Online Life of the Digital Native: What they fo differently
because of technology, and how they do it. Mark Prensky:
http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky-
The_Emerging_Online_Life_of_the_Digital_Native-03.pdf adresinden alınmıştır
52 Öğretmen Adaylarının Dijital Yerli Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi
Barış ÇUKURBAŞI - Aytekin İŞMAN
Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt 3, Sayı 1, s. 28 - 54, Yaz 2014, BARTIN – TÜRKİYE
Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education Volume 3, Issue 1, p. 28 - 54, Summer 2014, BARTIN – TURKEY
Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching Digital Naatives: Partnering for Real Learning. California: Corwin
A SAGE Company.
Rideout, V., Roberts, D., ve Foehr, U. (2005). Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8-18 Yearolds.
A Kaiser Family Foundation Study.
Rikhye, R., Cook, S., ve Berge, Z. (2009). Digital Natives vs. Digital Immigrants: Myth or Reality?
International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(2), s. 3-10.
Roberts, G. (2005). Technology and Learning expectations of the Net Generation. D. Oblinger,
ve J. Oblinger içinde, Educating the Net Generation. EDUCAUSE Transforming
Education Through Information Technologies.
Schulmeister, R. (2010). Students, Internet, eLearning and Web 2.0. M. Ebner, ve M. Schiefner
içinde, Looking Toward the Future of Technology-Enhanced Education: Ubiquitous
Learning and the Digital Native (s. 13-36). New York: Information Science Reference.
Sims, R., ve Koszalka, T. (2008). Competencies for the New-Age Instuctional Designer. J.
Spector, M. Merrill, J. Merrienboer, ve M. Driscoll içinde, Handbook of Research On
Educational Communications And Technology (3 b., s. 569-575). New York: Taylor &
Francis Group.
Sprenger, M. (2010). brain-based teaching :) in the digital age. Alexandria: ASCD.
Şahin, M. (2010). Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Yeni Binyılın Öğrencileri (AECD-New Millenium
Learners) Ölçütlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Anadolu
Üniversitesi.
Tapscot, D. (2009). grown up digital. London: McGraw-Hill.
Waters, J. (2008). How Geek Became Chic. T.H.E. Journal, 35(2), s. 48-50.
WeiB, S., ve Bader, H. (2010). How to Improve Media Literacy and Media Skills of Secondary
School Teachers in Order to Prepare Them for the Next Generation of Learners: A New
Type og In-Service Training for Teachers. M. Ebner, ve M. Schiefner içinde, Looking
Toward the Future of Technology-Enhanced Education: Ubiquitous Learning and the
Digital Native (s. 34-54). New York: Information Science Reference.
Weiss, M., ve Hanson-Baldaof, D. (2008). E-Mail in Academia: Expectations, Use, and
Instructional Impact. EDUCAUSE Quarterly Magazine, 31(1), s. 42-50.