Buradasınız

Akademik Potansiyele Yönelik İnanç ve Duygular Ölçeğinin Türkçe Versiyonunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği

The Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Academic Potential Beliefs and Feelings Scale

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study is to examine validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Academic Potential Beliefs and Feelings Scale (Patall, Awad, & Cestone, 2014). Participants were 355 undergraduate students. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 10 items and twodimensional model (satisfaction in academic potential and perceived academic potential) was well fit (x²= 59.60, df= 29, RMSEA= .056, CFI= .97, IFI= .98, GFI= .97, SRMR= .036). The internal consistency reliability coefficients were .75 for satisfaction in academic potential subscale, .81 for perceived academic potential subscale. Findings, demonstrated that this scale is a valid and reliable instrument.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Akademik Potansiyele Yönelik İnanç ve Duygular Ölçeğini (Patall, Awad, & Cestone, 2014) Türkçe’ye uyarlamak ve ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirliğini incelemektir. Araştırma 355 üniversite öğrencisi üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçları, 10 madde ve iki alt boyuttan oluşan modelin (akademik potansiyel memnuniyeti ve algılanan akademik potansiyel) iyi uyum verdiğini göstermiştir (x²= 59.60, sd= 29, RMSEA= .056, CFI= .97, IFI= .98, GFI= .97, SRMR= .036). Ölçeğin iç tutarlık güvenirlik katsayıları, akademik potansiyel memnuniyeti alt ölçeği için .75, algılanan akademik potansiyel alt ölçeği için .81 olarak bulunmuştur. Bu bulgular, ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin sağlandığını göstermektedir.
49
62

REFERENCES

References: 

Anderson, C. A., & Jennings, D. L. (1980). When experiences of failure promote expectations of
success: The impact of attributing failure to ineffective strategies. Journal of
Personality, 48, 393–405.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Beane, J. A. (1994). Cluttered terrain: The schools’ interest in the self. In T. M. Brinpthaupt & R.
P. Lipka (Eds.), Changing the self: Philosophies, techniques, and experiences. SUNY
Series: Studying the self (pp. 69–87). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Beery, R. G. (1975). Fear of failure in the student experience. Personnel and Guidance Journal,
54, 190–203.
Berglas, S., & Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to
noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 405–417.
Berzonsky, M. D., & Kuk, L. S. (2005). Identity style, psychosocial maturity, and academic
performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 235–247.
Berzonsky, M. D. (1990). Self-construction over the life span: A process perspective on identity
formation. In G. J. Neimeyer & R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.), Advances in personal construct
psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 155–186). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Berzonsky, M. D. (1989). Identity style: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of
Adolescent Research, 4, 268–282.
Beyer, S. (1998). Gender differences in causal attributions by college students of performance
on course examinations. Current Psychology, 17(4), 346-358.
Bong, M., & Clark, R. E. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic
motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34, 139–153.
Boyd, V. S., Patricia, H. F., Kandell, J. J., & Lucas, M. S. (2003). Relationship between identity
processing style and academic success in undergraduate students. Journal of College
Student Development, 44, 155–167.
Cadely, H., Pittman, J. F., Kerpelman, J. L., & Adler-Baeder, F. (2011). The role of identity styles
and academic possible selves on academic outcomes for high school students. An
International Journal of Theory and Research, 11, 267–288.
58
Akademik Potansiyele Yönelik İnanç ve Duygular Ölçeğinin Türkçe Versiyonunun Geçerlik ve …
Ahmet AKIN - Ümran AKIN - Banu YILDIZ
Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt 3, Sayı 2, s. 49 - 62, Kış 2014, BARTIN – TÜRKİYE
Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education Volume 3, Issue 2, p. 49 - 62, Winter 2014, BARTIN – TURKEY
Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school
reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Dillon, R. L., & Tinsley, C. H. (2008). How near-misses influence decision making under risk: A
missed opportunity for learning. Management Science, 8, 1425–1440.
Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–
1048.
Emler, N. (2001). Self-esteem: The costs and causes of low self-worth. York, England: Joseph
Rountree Foundation.
Erkut, S. (1983). Exploring sex differences in expectancy, attribution, and academic
achievement. Sex Roles, 9, 217–231.
Frieze, I. H., Whitley, B., Hanusa, B., & McHugh, M. (1982). Assessing the theoretical models for
sex differences in causal attributions for success and failure. Sex Roles, 8, 333–343.
Hejazi, E., Shahraray, M., Farsinejad, M., & Asgary, A. (2009). Identity styles and academic
achievement: Mediating role of academic self-efficacy. Social Psychological Education,
12, 123–135.
Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis:
Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 reference guide. Lincolnwood IL: Scientific
Software International.
Kruger, J., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Actions, intentions, and self-assessment: The road to selfenhancement
is paved with good intentions. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 30, 328–339.
Leondari, A., Syngollitou, E., & Kiosseoglou, G. (1998). Academic achievement, motivation and
future selves. Education Studies, 24, 153–163.
Levine, R., Gillman, M. J., & Reis, H.T. (1982). Individual differences or sex differences in
achievement attributions? Sex Roles, 8, 455–466.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.
Marsh, H. W., & O’Neill, R. (1984). Self-Description Questionnaire III (SDQIII): The construct
validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of
Educational Measurement, 21, 153–174.
Mok, M. M. C., Kennedy, K. J., & Moore, P. J. (2011). Academic attribution of secondary
students: Gender, year level, and achievement level. Educational Psychology: An
International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 31, 87–104.
Oyserman, D. (2008). Possible selves: Identity-based motivation and school success. In H.
Marsh, R. Craven, & D., McInerney (Eds.), International advances in self research. Vol.
3: Self-processes, learning and enabling human potential—Dynamic new approaches
(pp. 269–288). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., Terry, K., & Hart-Johnson, T. (2004). Possible selves as roadmaps.
Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 130–149.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research,
66, 543–578.
59
Akademik Potansiyele Yönelik İnanç ve Duygular Ölçeğinin Türkçe Versiyonunun Geçerlik ve …
Ahmet AKIN - Ümran AKIN - Banu YILDIZ
Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt 3, Sayı 2, s. 49 - 62, Kış 2014, BARTIN – TÜRKİYE
Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education Volume 3, Issue 2, p. 49 - 62, Winter 2014, BARTIN – TURKEY
Patall E. A., Awad, G. H. & Cestone, C. M. (2014). Academic potential beliefs and feelings:
Conceptual development and relations with academic outcomes. Self and Identity,
(13)1, 58–80.
Rhodewalt, F., & Davison, J. (1986). Self-handicapping and subsequent performance: Role of
outcome valence and attributional certainty. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7,
307–323.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1993). What you can change and what you can’t: The complete guide to
successful self-improvement. New York: Fawcett.
Siegle, D., Rubenstein, L. D., Pollard, E., & Romey, E. (2010). Exploring the relationships of
college freshman honors students’ effort and ability attribution, interest, and implicit
theory of intelligence with perceived ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 92–101.
Sipahi, B., Yurtkoru, E. S. & Çinko, M. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS’le veri analizi. İstanbul:
Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
Skinner, E. A. (1995). Perceived control, motivation, and coping. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stevenson, H. W. (1992). Con: Don’t deceive children through a feel good approach. What’s
behind self-esteem programs: Truth or trickery? School Administrator, 49(4).
Stout, M. (2000). The feel-good curriculum: The dumbing down of America’s kids in the name of
self-esteem. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
Swim, J. K., & Sanna, L. J. (1996). He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers'm
attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 22, 507-519.
Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury Park, CA:
Sage.
Williams, E. F., Gilovich, T., & Dunning, D. (2012). Being all that you can be: The weighting of
potential in assessments of self and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
38, 143–154.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com