Al, U. (2005). Çok yazarlılığın bilimsel iletişimdeki yeri. M. E. Küçük (Yay. Haz.). Prof. Dr. Nilüfer Tuncer’e
Armağan içinde (ss.31-41). Ankara: TKD.
Al, U., Şahiner, M. ve Tonta, Y. (2006). Arts and humanities literature: Bibliometric characteristics of
contributions by Turkish authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 57(8), 1011–1022.
Anderson, K., Sack, J., Krauss, L. ve O’Keefe, L. (2001). Publishing online-only peer-reviewed biomedical
literature: Three years of citation, author perception, and usage experience. The Journal of
Electronic Publishing, 6(3). 15 Kasım 2008 tarihinde http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/textidx?c
=jep;view=text;rgn=main;idno=3336451.0006.303 adresinden erişildi.
Bates, T., Anić, A., Marušić, M. ve Marušić, A. (2004). Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions:
Comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms. JAMA, 292(1),
86-88.
Bauer, K. ve Bakkalbasi, N. (2005). An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication
environment. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9). 15 Kasım 2008 tarihinde http://dlib.org/dlib/september05/
bauer/09bauer.html adresinden erişildi.
Bhat, S. V. R. ve Kumar, B. T. S. (2008). Web citation behaviour in scholarly electronic journals in the field
of library and information science. Webology, 5(2). 15 Kasım 2008 tarihinde http://www.webology.
ir/2008/v5n2/a57.html adresinden erişildi.
Borgman, C. L. ve Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of
Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72.
Carriveau, K. L. (2001). A brief history of e-prints and the opportunities they open for science librarians.
C. Schlembach ve W.H. Mischo (Yay.Haz.). Electronic resources and services in scitech libraries
içinde (ss.73-82). Mary Binghamton, NY: Haworth Information Press.
Casalini, B. (2003). Journals and monographs: An Italian perspective. LIBER Quarterly, 13, 222-231.
16 Kasım 2008 tarihinde http://liber.library.uu.nl/publish/articles/000037/article.pdf adresinden
erişildi.
Clarke, B. L. (1964). Multiple authorship trends in scientific papers. Science, 143(3608), 822-824.
Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in
scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 52(7), 558-569.
22
BİLGİ DÜNYASI, 2009, 10 (1) Nazan Özenç UÇAK - Umut AL
Cunningham, S. J. ve Bocock, D. (1995). Obsolescence of computing literature. Scientometrics,
34(2), 255-262.
Davis, P. M. ve Cohen, S. A. (2001). The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996–
1999. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(4), 309-314.
Denkel, A., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Pak, N. K. ve Pamuk, Ş. (2002). Türkiye’de sosyal bilimlerin uluslararası
yayın performansı. Ankara: TÜBA.
Glänzel, W. ve Schoepflin, U. (1995). A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific
literature. Journal of Information Science, 21(1), 37-53.
Gordon, M. D. (1980). A critical reassessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship, scientific
collaboration, the production of papers and their acceptance for publication. Scientometrics, 2(3),
193-201.
Herman, E. (2001). End-users in academia: Meeting the information needs of university researchers in
an electronic age: Part 2 Innovative information-accessing opportunities and the researcher: User
acceptance of IT-based information resources in academia. Aslib Proceedings, 53(10), 431-457.
Herring, S. D. (2002). Use of electronic resources in scholarly electronic journals: A citation analysis.
College and Research Libraries, 63(4), 334-340.
Kushkowski, J. D. (2005). Web citation by graduate students: A comparison of print and electronic
theses. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 5(2), 259-276.
Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y. ve Warner, J. (1996). The role of monographs in scholarly communication:
An empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics. Journal of Documentation, 52, 389-
404.
Liu, Z. (2003). Trends in transforming scholarly communication and their implications. Information
Processing and Management, 39(6), 889-898.
Magner, D. K. (2000). Seeking a radical change in the role of publishing. The Chronicle of Higher
Education. 15 Kasım 2008 tarihinde http://chronicle.com/free/v46/i41/41a01601.htm adresinden
erişildi.
Sangam, S. L. (1998). Obsolescence of literature in the field of psychology. Scientometrics, 44(1), 33-
46.
Sylvia, M. J. (1998). Citation analysis as an unobtrusive method for journal collection evaluation using
psychology student research bibliographies. Collection Building, 17(1), 20-28.
Thompson, J. W. (2002). The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in
literary scholarship. Libri, 52(3), 121-136.
Tonta, Y. (2006). Açık erişim: Bilimsel iletişim ve sosyal bilimlerde süreli yayıncılık üzerine etkileri. Sosyal
Bilimlerde Süreli Yayıncılık-2006 I. Ulusal Kurultay Bildirileri içinde (ss.23-32). Ankara: ULAKBİM.
Uzun, A. (1998). A scientometric profile of social sciences in Turkey, International Information and Library
Review, 30, 169-184.
Vickery, B. C. (2000). Scientific communication in history. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press.
Waters, L. (2000). A modest proposal for preventing the books of the members of the MLA from being a
burden to their authors, publishers, or audiences. PMLA, 115(3), 315-317.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
