Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Koleksiyon Yönetiminde Ödünç Verme İstatistiklerinin Kullanımı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Örneği

Use of Circulation Statistics in Collection Management: A Case Study of Hacettepe University

Journal Name:

  • Bilgi Dünyası

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, Hacettepe University Libraries, which provide services for various types of faculties having one of the largest book collections in Turkey, were investigated in terms of their book collection. The aim of the study is to help the decision makers to understand their own collection in a better way, to support the decision making process for selecting new materials or weeding existing ones in the light of circulation statistics. In this context, the most frequently requested books by Hacettepe University Libraries’ users were determined and the collection analysis was built on the circulation statistics. The usage differences among the subject fields based on Library of Congress (LC) classes were also examined in this study by analyzing the circulation statistics. Findings showed that there was almost seven‐fold difference between the average number of total circulation in the classes of Language & Literature and Fine Arts.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada Türkiye’deki en büyük kitap koleksiyonlarından bir tanesine sahip olan ve çok farklı türde fakültelere hizmet veren Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphanelerinin kitap koleksiyonu incelenmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, ödünç verme istatistiklerine dayalı olarak gerçekleştirilen koleksiyon analizi çalışmalarının, kütüphanelerin kendi koleksiyonlarını yakından tanımalarına, yeni kaynak seçimi ya da mevcut kaynakların ayıklanması konularında karar alma süreçlerine nasıl yardımcı olabileceğini göstermektir. Bu bağlamda Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri kullanıcıları tarafından en sık talep edilen kitaplar saptanmış ve ödünç verme istatistiklerine dayalı olarak koleksiyon analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada Kongre Kütüphanesi (LC) Sınıflama Sistemine dayalı olarak konu alanları arasında kullanım farklılığı bulunup bulunmadığı da test edilmektedir. Araştırmanın bulguları, ortalama ödünç verme sayıları bakımından Dil ve Edebiyat alanı ile Güzel Sanatlar alanı arasında hemen hemen yedi katlık bir farklılık olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-koleksiyon-yonetiminde-odunc-verme-istatistiklerinin-kullanimi-hacettepe-universitesi-ornegi.pdf
  • 2
223-238
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Adams, B. ve Noel, B. (2008). Circulation statistics in the evaluation of collection development.
Collection Building, 27(2), 71-73.
Britten, W.A. (1990). A use statistic for collection management: The 80/20 rule revisited. Library
Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, 14(2), 183-189.
Brush, D. (2007). Circulation analysis of an engineering monograph approval plan. Collection
Building, 26(2), 59-62.
Carpenter, D. ve Getz, M. (1995). Evaluation of library resources in the field of economics: a case
study. Collection Management, 20(1), 49-89.
Christianson, M. ve Aucoin, M. (2005). Electronic or print books: Which are used? Library Collections,
Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 29(1), 71-81.
Connell, T.H. (1991). Comparing the circulation of library materials ordered by faculty and
librarians. Collection Management, 14(1-2), 73-84.
Dinkins, D. (2003). Circulation as assessment: Collection development policies evaluated in terms
of circulation at a small academic library. College & Research Libraries, 64(1), 46-53.
Fernandez, M. (2003). A usage comparison for print and electronic books in the University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill. 19 Temmuz 2011 tarihinde http://ils.unc.edu/MSpapers/2827.pdf
adresinden erişildi.
Gorman, G.E. ve Miller, R.H. (1997). Collection management for the 21st century: a handbook for
librarians. Westport: Greenwood.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri. (2010). Hacettepe University Libraries. 15 Ocak 2010
tarihinde http://www.library.hacettepe.edu.tr adresinden erişildi.
Horowitz, I.L. ve Curtis, M.E. (1995). Scholarly book publishing in the 1990s. Philip G. Altbach ve
Edith S. Hoshino. (Yay. Haz.) International book publishing: an encyclopedia içinde (s. 303-312).
New York : Garland.
Irwin, K. (2008). Comparing circulation rates of monographs and anthologies of literary criticism:
implications for cooperative collection development. Collection Management, 33(1-2), 69-81.
Johnson, P. (2004). Fundamentals of collection development and management. Chicago: American
Library Association.
Kinner, L. ve Crosetto, A. (2009). Balancing act for the future: how the academic library engages
in collection development at the local and consortial levels. Journal of Library Administration,
49(4), 419-437.
Knievel, J.E., Witch, H. ve Connaway, L.S. (2006). Use of circulation statistics and interlibrary loan
data in collection management. College & Research Libraries, 67(1), 35-49.
Köprülü, D. (1994). Üniversite kütüphanelerinde kitap koleksiyonunun kullanımı üzerine bir araştırma.
Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Littman, J. ve Connaway, L.S. (2004). A circulation analysis of print books and e-books in an
academic research library. Library Resources & Technical Services, 48(4), 256-262.
238
BİLGİ DÜNYASI, 2011, 12 (2) 223-238 Umut AL ve İrem SOYDAL
Ochola, J.N. (2002). Use of circulation statistics and interlibrary loan data in collection management.
Collection Management, 27(1), 1-13.
O’Neill, E.T. ve Gammon, J.A. (2009). Building collections cooperatively: analysis of collection use in
the OhioLINK library consortium. 19 Temmuz 2011 tarihinde http://web2.ala.org/ala/mgrps/
divs/acrl/events/national/seattle/papers/36.pdf adresinden erişildi.
Schmidt, C.M. ve Eckerman, N.L. (2001). Circulation of core collection monographs in an academic
medical library. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 89(2), 165-169.
Singh, S.P. (2004). Collection management in the electronic environment. The Bottom Line:
Managing Library Finances, 17(2), 55-60.
Slater, R. (2009). E-books or print books, “big deals” or local selections-What gets more use? Library
Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 33(1), 31-41.
Summerfield M., Mandel, C. ve Kantor P. (2002). Perspectives on scholarly online books: the
Columbia University online books evaluation project. Journal of Library Administration,
35(1/2), 61-82.
Tucker, J.C. (2009). Collection assessment of monograph purchases at the University of Nevada,
Las Vegas Libraries. Collection Management, 34(3), 157-181.
Ünlü, A.M. (2006). Kara Harp Okulu Kütüphanesi koleksiyonunun kullanım analizi: Bir koleksiyon
geliştirme önerisi. Yayımlanmamış bilim uzmanlığı tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com