Buradasınız

BİLGİ YÖNETİM VE ORGANİZASYON ÖRGÜT YAPISI arasındaki karĢılıklı iliĢkinin ANALYZE

ANALYZE OF INTERRELATION BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF ORGANIZATION

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of the article is to discuss interrelation between knowledge management and organizational structure of organization. Organizational structure is a backbone of the organization. Type of organizational structure used has strong impact on everyday life of organization and influences all its activities, including knowledge management. From the point of view of knowledge management, three basic groups of organizational structures can be identified in organizations; top down structures, bottom up structures and combined structures. The article defines advantages and disadvantages of these groups of organizational structures and explains how they influence knowledge management activities in the organization. Combined organizational structure represents the best choice for those who want to use full potential of knowledge in their organization. The article presents results of the research made by Department of Management, University of Economics Prague in organizations in the Czech Republic. The research started in 2004. Till today, 131 organizations have been interviewed. The results of research show growth in number of combined organizational structures, especially in highly competitive industries.
41-52

REFERENCES

References: 

Brewer, M. B. (1981) “Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust.” In. Brewer, M.B., Collins, B.E, Scientific inquiry in the social sciences. Jossey-Bass. p. 214-231.
Davenport, T.H., Prusac, L. (1998) “Working knowledge.” Harvard Business School Press. UK 1998. ISBN 0-87584-655-6
Fukuyama, F. (1995) “Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity.” New York: Free Press.
Ford, D. P. (2003) “Trust and Knowledge Management: The Seeds of Success.” In Holsapple W. C. Handbook on Knowledge Management. Springer-Verlag New York, 2003, ISBN 3-540-43527-1.
Kim, K. & Prabhakar, B. (2000) “Initial trust, perceived risk, and the adoption of Internet banking.” ICIS 2000 Proceedings, Brisbane, Australia, p. 537-543.
Mládková, L. (2003) “Management in Non Linear Environment.” VŠE Praha. 2003. Pg. 92-94, ISBN 80-245-0472-3.
Mládková, L. (2004) “Knowledge Management in Different Types of Organisational Structures”. The Fourth International Conference on Knowledge, Culture and Change in Organistions 3. - 6. 8. 2004 London UK. 1. vyd. Australia: Common Group Publishing Pty Ltd 2004. pg. 5-6. ISBN 1 86335 565 0.
Mládková, L. (2005) “Moderní přístupy k managementu. Tacitní znalost a jak ji řídit.” C.H.Beck. Praha 2005. ISBN 80-7179-310-8.
Mládková, L. (2010) “Cooperation and its Role in Knowledge Society”, Journal of International Scientific Publications, Economy and Business, Volume 4, ISSN 1313-2525, pg. 4-6
Polanyi, M. (1966) “The Tacit Dimension.” London. Routledge & Kegan Paul UK. 1966. Pg. 6. in Nonaka I.. Toyama R.. Byosiere P.: A Theory of Organisational Knowledge Creation: Understanding the Dynamic Process of Creating. Eudokma. Kodaň. 2001. pg. 494.
Nonaka I., Takeuchi, H. (1995) “The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation.” Oxford University Press. UK. 1995. ISBN 0-19-509269.
Robinson, S. L. (1996) “Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574-599.
Rouseau, D.M., Sitkin, B.S., Burt R.S., Camerer C. (1998) “Not so Different After All: a Crossdiscipline View of Trust.” California Institute of TechnologyAcadomy of Management Review1998, Vol. 23, No. 3, 393-404.
Shapiro, D., Sheppard, B.H. & Cheraskin, L. (1992) “Business on a Handshake.” Negotiation Journal, 8(4), 365-377.
Veber, Jaromír a kol. (2000) “Management, základy, prosperita, globalizace.” Management Press. Praha. 2000. ISBN 80-7261-029-5.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com