Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

BENOIT HİPOTEZİ: SEÇİLMİŞ OECD ÜLKELERİ ÖLÇEĞİNDE PANEL VERİLER YARDIMIYLA ANALİZİ

BENOIT HYPOTHESIS: ANALYSING BY PANEL DATA AS A SCALE OF SELECTED OECD COUNTRIES

Journal Name:

  • Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
"Defense is of much more importance than opulence" Adam Smith (Wealth of Nations) In this study we employ the panel data testing procedure to test causal effect between military expenditure and economic growth in OECD member countries from the year 1991 to 2008. Ampirically, our results suggest that military spendings has negative effects on economic growth. In this study initially unit root analysis has been made and following this step panel cointegration test has been made. Fınally ındependent variables's one lagged was added to model ın order to debug the model from autocorrelatin according to the Durbin-Watson Statistics.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
"Savunma Zenginlikten Önemlidir " Adam Smith (Ulusların Zenginliği) Bu çalışmada savunma harcamaları ile OECD üyesi ülkeler için ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkinin yönü 1991 - 2008 yılları arası için panel veri yöntemi kullanılarak test edilmeye çalışılıştır. Uygulama sonuçları açısından savunma harcamalarının ekonomik büyüme üzerinde negatif etkisi olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Çalışmanın uygulama bölümünde ilk olarak birim kök analizi yapılmış, bunu takiben panel kointegrasyon analizi yapılmıştır. Son olarak nihai modele bağımsız değişkenin bir gecikmesi eklenerek model otokorelasyondan arındırılmaya çalışılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-benoit-hipotezi-secilmis-oecd-ulkeleri-olceginde-panel-veriler-yardimiyla-analizi.pdf
  • 2
204-215
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

BALTAGİ, B.H.,(2005), Econometric Analysis Of Panel Data Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons Gmbh, West Sussex, England.
BRANSCOMB, L.M. (1995), U.S. Science and Technology Policy: Issues for the 1990s, Cambridge:Simon Scrrvvartzman Coord.
DEĞER, S., R. Smith, (1983), "Military Expenditure and Growth in Less Developed Countries", The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol:27 No:2,
335 - 353
ESHAY, E. (1983), Fiscal and Monetary Policies and Problems in Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FONTANEL, J, (1995), "Economics of Diarmament", Handbook of Defence Economics I, Ed: Keith Hartley Todd Sandler, London, 57 - 73.
GALVİN, H. ,(2003), "The Impact of Defence Spending On The Economic Growth of Developing Countries: A Cross-Section Study", Defence andPeace Economics, Volume:18, Number:4, 317.
GRANGER, C.W.J. & P Newbold,. (1974) "Spurious Regressions In Economics". Journal of Econometrics, 2 (2) July, pp.111-120.
GRENE, W.H., (2003), Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, New
Jersey.
HSİAO, C, (2002), Analysis Of Panel Data, Cambridge University Press, Second Edition, New York.
JOERDİNG, W., (1986), "Economic Growth and Defence Spending Granger Causality", Journal of Development Economics, Vol:21, Issue:1, 35 -
40.
LACİVİTA ,C.J., P. Frederiksen, (1991), "Defence Spending and Economiic Growth An Alternative Approach To Causality Issue, Journal Of DevelopmentEconomics, Vol: 35, Issue:1, 117 - 125.
LİM, D. (1983), "Another Look At Growth and Defence In Less
Developed Countries", Economic Development and Culturel Change, Vol:31, Issue:2, 377 - 384.
LOONEY, R. E. (1994), The Economics of Third World Defense
Expenditures, London: Jaı Press, Inc.
PAZARLIOĞLU, V, Ö.K. Gürler, (2007), "Telekominikasyon Yatırımları ve Ekonomik Büyüme Panel Veri Yaklaşımı", 8. Türkiye Ekonometri ve İstatistik Kongresi, Malatya.
SOLOW, R. M., (1956), "A Contribution To The Theory Of Economic Growth", Quarterly Journal Of Economics, 70 (1), 65 - 94.
YAKOVLEV P., (2007), "Arms Trade, Military Spending and
Economic Growth", Defence and Peace Economics, Vol:18, No:4.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com