Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Akustik Rinometri

Acoustic Rhinometry

Journal Name:

  • Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Acoustic rhinometry (AR) is a new method to evaluate nasal functions in our country. Acoustic rhinometry can be used for scientific study and also practice. AR measurements have been used for scientific and clinical purposes. The method has been used to detect normal anatomy, nasal cycle, drug actions in the nasal cavity, changes in some disorders such as nasal polyposis or septal deviations and the effects of surgical treatment. Briefly, the method involves measurements of cross sectional area and acoustic reflections from the nasal cavity of a sound pulse and produced by a spark in a sound tube connected to the nasal cavity via a nosepiece. Acustic rhinometry is a clinically reliable method for measuring nasal cavity geometry in the anterior and middle parts of the nasal cavity. The acoustic values for the cross-sectional area shows the effects of transmission loss and oscillation artifacts because of soft plate movement and paranasal sinus. Therefore the accuracy of acustic rhinometry for posterior of nasal cavity is controversial. Finally, acoustic rhinometry can be used to detect the patients with septal deviation and concha hypertrophy. However, it should be supported with clinical examination and patients’ symptoms. And also we can get some problems to evaluate the groups by Acustic rhinometry due to difference weight and height in the groups.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Akustik rinometri ülkemizde henüz kullanılmaya başlanmış yeni bir nazal fonksiyonları ölçüm yöntemidir. Akustik rinometri bilimsel çalışma ve klinik değerlendirme amaçlı kullanılabilir. Akustik rinometri ile normal nazal anotomi, nazal siklüs, ilaçların nazal kaviteye etkileri, septal deviasyon, konka hipertrofisi ve nazal polipozis gibi bazı hastalılardaki değişikleri ve nazal cerrahinin etkileri değerlendirilebilir. Akustik rinometri kısaca nazal boşluğa ses dalgası gönderip, yansımasına bağlı olarak burun içi kesitsel alanlar ve bu alanların burun deliğinden uzaklığı hakkında bilgi veren bir cihazdır. Yapılan çalışmalarda akustik rinometri nazal kavitenin ön ve orta kısımlarında güvenle kullanılabildiği gösterilmiştir. Yumuşak damağın hareketi ve paranazal sinüsler nedeniyle nazal kavitenin arka bölümü ve nazofarenksin volüm ölçümünde güvenilir olmayan değişken sonuçlar çıkabilir. Sonuç olarak, akustik rinometri yöntemi, deviasyon ve konka hipertrofili hastaların tespiti için kullanılabilir bir yöntemdir ve hastanın semptomları ile klinik muayene bulgularıyla örtüşmektedir. Ancak akustik rinometriyi daha önce belirtildiği gibi kişinin boy ve kilo değişiminden etkilendiği için grupları kıyaslamada sorunlar ile karşılaşılabilmektedir ve ortaya çıkan bulguların doğruluk payı azalmaktadır. Bu da bu verilerin ancak hastanın semptomları ve klinik muayene bulgularıyla örtüşebildiğinde kullanılabilir ve güvenilir olduğunu göstermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-akustik-rinometri.pdf
  • 4
155 - 161
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Sondhi MM, Gopinath B. Determination of vocaltract
shape from impluse response at the lips. J Acoust
Soc Am 1970; 18676-18673.
2. Fouke JM, Wolin AD, Strohl KP, Galbraith GM. Elastie
eharaeteristies of the airway wall.J Appl Physiol 1989;
66: 962-967.
3. Fredberg JJ, Wohl ME, Glass GM, Dorkin HL. Airway
area by acoustie refleetionsmeasured at the mouth.
J Appl Physiol 1980; 48: 749-758.
4. Jackson AC, But1er J, Millet EJ, Hoppin FG, Dawson
Sv. Airway geometry by analysis of acoustic pulse response
measurements. J Appl Physiol 1977; 43: 523-
536.
5. Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF. Acoustic
rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometr:
by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 1989;66:295-300
6. Hilberg O, Lyholm B, Michelsen A, Pedersen B, Jacksor
Acoustic reflections during rhinometry: spatial
resolutim and sound loss. J Appl Physiol 1998; 84:
1030-1039.
7. Buenting JE, Dalston RM, Drake AF. Nasal cavity area
in term infants deterrnined by acoustic rhinometry.
Laryngoscope 1994; 104: 1439-1445.
8. Corey J, Gungor A, Nelson R, Fredberg J, Ltli V. A comparison
of nasal cross-sectional area and volumes
obtained with acoustic rhinomtry and MRI. Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg 1997; 117: 349-354.
9. Djupesland PG, Rotnes JS. Accuracy of acoustic rhinometry.
Rhinology 2001; 39: 23-27.
Cerrahpafla T›p Derg 2006; 37: 155 - 161
159
10. Gilain L, Coste A, Rieolfi F, Dahan E, Marliae D, Peynegre
R, Harf A, Louis B. Nasal cavity geometry measured
by aeoustic rhinometry and computed tomography.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123:
401-405.
11. Hilberg O, Jensen FT, Pedersen OF. Nasal airway
geometry: comparison between acoustic reflections
and magnetic resonans scanning. J Appl Physiol 1993;
75: 2811-2819.
12. Hilberg O, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: influence
of paranasal sinuses. J Physiol Appl.1996; 80:
1589-1594.
13. Lenders H, ScholI R, Brunner M. Acoustic rhinometry:
the bat princip1e of the nose. HNO 1992;40:239-247.
14. Buenting JE, Dalston RM, Smith 'IL, Drake AF. Artifacts
associated with acoustic rhinometric assessment
of infants and young children: a model study. J Appl
Physiol 1994; 77: 2558-2563.
15. Riechelmann H, Reinheimer MC, Wolfensberger M.
Acoustic rhinometry in pre-school children. Clin OtolaryngoI
1993; 272-277.
16. Buenting JE, Dalston RM, Drake AF. Nasal cavity area
in term infants determined by acoustic rhinometry.
Laryngoscope 1994; 104: 1439-45.
17. Pedersen OF, Berkowitz R, Yamagiwa M, Hilberg
O. Nasal cavity dimensions in the newbom measured
by acoustic reflections. Laryngoscope 1994; 104:
1023-1028.
18. Marchall I. Impadence reconstriction methods for
pulse reflectrometrt. Acustica 1992; 76: 118-128.
19. Hilberg O.,Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF. Acoustic
rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry
by acoustic reflection. J Appl physiol 1989;66: 295–303.
20. Hilberg O, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: recommendations
for technical speci.cations and standard
operating procedures, Rhinology 2000; 16: 3-17.
21. Mamikoglu B, Houser S, Akbar I, Ng B, Corey JP. Acoustic
rhinometry and computed tomography scans
for the diagnosis of nasal septal deviation with clinical
correlation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:
61-68.
22. Corey JP, Kemker BJ, Nelson R, Gungor A. Evaluation
of the nasal cavity by acoustic rhinometry in normal
and allergic subjects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
1997; 117: 22-28.
23. Grymer LF, Illium P, Hilberg O. Septoplasty and compensatory
inferior turbinate hypertrophy: a randomized
study evaluated by acoustic rhinometry. J Laryngol
Otol 1993; 107: 413-417.
24. Tomkinson A, Eccles R. Comparison of the relative
abilities of acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry,
and the visual analogue scale in detecting change
in the nasal cavity in a healthy adult population. Am
J Rhinol 1996; 10: 161-165.
25. Djupesiand PG. Acoustic rhinometry optimised for
infants . Rhinology. 1999; 37: 141-142.
26. Numminen J, Dastidar P, Heinonen T, Karhuketo T,
Rautiainen M. Reliability of acoustic rhinometry. Respir
Med 2003; 97: 421-427.
27. Fisher EW, Palmer CR, Daly NJ, Lund VJ. Acoustic
rhinometry in the pre-operative assessment of adenoidectomy
candidates. Acta Otolaryngol 1995;
115: 815-822.
28. Young-Ki Kim, Jung-Ho Kang, Kun-Sik Yoon. Acoustic
rhinometric evaluation of nasal cavity and nasopharynx
after adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr.
Otorhinolaryngol 1998; 44: 215-220.
29. Marques VC, Anselmo-Lima WT. Pre and postoperative
evaluation by acoustic rhinometry of children
submitted to adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 68: 311-316.
30. O. Elbrønd, O. Hilberg, J.U. Felding, O.B. Andersen.
Acoustic rhinometry used as a method to demonstrated
change in the volume of the nasopharynx after
adenoidectomy. Clin. Otolaryngol. 1991; 16: 84-86.
31. Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, Shriper I, Hoffstein
V, Zamel N. Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation
of nasal obstruction. Laryngoscope 1995; 105: 275-
281.
32. Szucs E, Clement PA. Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry
in the evaluation of nasal patency of patients
with nasal septal deviation. Am J Rhinol 1998;
12: 345-352.
33. L. Brodsky, E. Adler, J.F. Stanicdich. Naso and oropharyngeal
dimensions in children with obstructive
sleep apnea. Int J Pediatr Otolaryngol 1989; 17: 1-
11.
34. H. Lenders, J. Schaefer, W. Pirsig. Turbinate hypertrophy
in habitual snorers and patients with obstructive
sleep apnea: findings of acoustic rhinometry.
Laryngoscope 1991;101: 614-618.
35. Gungor A, Moinuddin R, Nelson RH.Detection of the
nasal cycle with acoustic rhinometry: techniques and
applications. Otolarygol Head Neck Surg 1999; 120:
238-247.
36. Zhı Lı Huang, Kee Leong Ong, Sze Yı Goh, Han Lım
Lıew, Kıan Hıan Yeoh (Eds), and De Yun Wang, Singapore,
Assessment of nasal cycle by acoustic rhinometry
and rhinomanometry Otolaryngology–Head
and Neck Surgery, 2003; 4: 128.
37. Hilberg O, Grymer LF, Pedersen OF. Nasal histamine
challenge in nonallergic and allergic subjects evaluated
by acoustic rhinometry. Allergy 1995; 50: 166-173.
U. ÇAKATAY ve ark.
160
38. Kano S, Pegersen OF, Sly PD. Nasal response to inhaled
histamine measured by acoustic rhinometry
in infants. Pediatr PulmonoI 1994; 17: 312-319.
39. Kesavanathan J, Swift DL, Fitzgerald TK, Permutt T,
Bascom R. Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry and
posterior rhinomanometry as tools for inhalation challenge
studies.J Toxicol Environ Health 1996; 48:
295-307.
40. Corey JP, Gungor A, Nelson RH, Velde T. The effects
of environmental noise on acoustic rhinometry. Am
J Rhinol 1996; 10: 247–249.
41. Tomkinson A, Eccles R. The effect of changes in ambient
temperature on the reliability of acoustic rhinometry
data. Rhinology 1996; 34: 75–77.
42. Özdek A., Övet G., Bayız Ü., Kılıç R., Tarhan R., Göçmen
H., Samim E., Topikal İmidazolin Türevleri ve
Oral Psödoefedrinin Dekonjestan Etkilerinin Sağlıklı
Kişilerde Akustik Rinometri İle Değerlendirilmesi.
Türk Otolarengoloji Arşivi 2003; 41: 20-24.
43. Tatlıpınar A. U., Keser R., Anadolu R. Septum Deviasyonlarında
Preoperatif-Postoperatif Dönemde Akustik
Rinometrik Değerlendirme. Kulak Burun Boğaz ve
Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi 2001; 9: 68-73.
44. Cakmak O, Celik H, Cankurtaran M, Buyuklu F, Ozgirgin
N, Ozluoglu LN. Effects of paranasal sinus ostia
and volume on acoustic rhinometry measurements:
a model study. J Appl Physiol 2003; 94: 1527-1535.
45. Cakmak O, Coskun M, Celik H, Buyuklu F, Ozluoglu
LN. Value of acoustic rhinometry for measuring nasal
valve area. Laryngoscope. 2003; 113: 295-302.
46. Tarhan E, Coskun M, Cakmak O, Celik H, Cankurtaran
M. Acoustic rhinometry in humans:accuracy of nasal
passage area estimates, and ability to quantify paranasal
sinus volume and osteum size. J Appl Physiol
2005; 99: 616-623.
Cerrahpafla T›p Derg 2006; 37: 155 - 161
161

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com