Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

PARASAL AKTARIM MEKANİZMASI VE PARA POLİTİKASI ARACI: TÜRKİYE’DE AKTARIM MEKANİZMASI

The Monetary Transmission Mechanism and Monetary Policy Tool: Transmission Mechanism in Turkey

Journal Name:

  • Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2004
Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study covers the theoretical discussions between The Monetarist and New Keynesian Transmission Mechanism. The study identifies the implications of both transmission mechanism for monetary policy. It also tests these two transmission hypothessis for Turkish data in order to provide an emprical contributions for the related issues. The econometric analysis of the study show that Turkish data support the monetarist hypothesis rather than the Keynesian credit driven mechanism of money transmission.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma esas olarak Paracı ve Yeni-Keynesyen Parasal Aktarım Mekanizması arasındaki teorik tartışmaları ele almaktadır. Çalışma her iki aktarım mekanizmasının para politikası ile ilgili etkisini tanımlamaktadır. Aynı zamanda konu ile ilgili ampirik bir katkı sağlamak amacı ile iki aktarım hipotezi Türkiye verileri ile test edilmektedir. Ekonometrik analiz sonuçları Türkiye verilerini kredi tarafından yönlendirilen Yeni- Keynesyen aktarım mekanizmasından çok paracı hipotezi desteklediğini göstermektedir
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-parasal-aktarim-mekanizmasi-para-politikasi-araci-turkiyede-aktarim-mekanizmasi.pdf
  • 1
201-212
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Black, F (1972), “Active and Passive Monetary Policy in a Neoclassical
Model”, The Journal of Finance, Vol.xxvııı, No.4, Sep, 575-601.
Blaug, Mark (1993), “Is the Quantity Theory Of money True ?”, Discussion
Paper in Economics, Exeter University, 93/08, 1-27.
Criqine, Roger and Havenner, Arthur (1981), “Choosing A Monetary
Instrument”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 3, 217-34.
Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü (1996), İstatistik Göstergeler.
Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü (1997), Türkiye İstatistik Yıllığı.
Early, James and Evans, Gary (1982), “The problem is Bank Liability
Management”, Challenge, Jan-Feb, 54-56.
Ertuğrul, Ahmet (1994), Para Teorisi, Bilkent Üniversitesi, Ankara..
Friedman, M.(1987), The Quantity Theory of Money, In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M
and P. Newman(9th ed.) The New Palgraves,A Dictionary of Economics,
London, MacMillan, 1-40.
Keyder, Nur (1993), Para, Teori, Politka, Uygulama, Bizim Büro Basım Evi,
Ankara.
King, Stephen (1986), “Monetary Transmission”, Jouranl of Money Credit and
Banking, Vol.18, No.3, August, 250-303.
King, Robert G.and Plosser, Charles (1984), “Money, Credit and Prices in a
Real Business Cycle”, American Economic Review, June, 363-379.
Laidler, David (1982), “Monetarist Perspective: On the Transmission
Mechanism”, Phillip Alan, Monetarist Perspective, Ch.4,109-152.
Laidler, David (1991), “The Quantity Theory is Always and Everwhere
Controversial - Why ?”, The Economic Record, December, 289-306.
Ireland, Peter (1994), “Money and Growth: An Alternative Approach”,
American Economic Review, March, 45-65.
Maddala, G.S (1992), Introduction to Econometrics, Maxwell Amcmillan
International Editions.
Moore, Basil, J.(1983), “Unpacking The Post Keynesian Black Box: Bank
Lending And the Money Supply”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics,
Summer, Vol.V, No.4, 537-556.
Tarlas, G. S. (1981), “Keynesian and Monetarist Theories of the Monetary
Trasmission”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 7, 317-337.
Tobin, James (1963), “Commercial Banks as Creators of Money”, in D.
Carson(ed.), Banking and Monetary Studies, 408-419.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com