Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ ÖĞRETMEN YETİŞTİRME SÜRECİNDE ÖNERİLEN DERS KİTAPLARIYLA OLAN DENEYİMLERİ

Prospective Elementary Science Teachers’ Experiences with Offered Textbooks in Teacher Education

Journal Name:

  • Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Textbooks have often been used for accomplish learning and teaching in teacher education, despite the prevalence of digital technologies. However, little has been done so far to understand the experiences of the users in higher education with textbooks. The purpose of this study is, therefore, to understand the experiences of senior prospective elementary science teachers (N=141) with offered textbooks and with instructors’ textbook use. The data were gathered qualitatively and analyzed by using the technique of content analysis to reveal the emerging themes. Findings suggest that the participants have positive and negative experiences with textbooks in regard to content, language/exposition, pedagogy, and physical/visual aspects. They also state their positive and negative experiences with instructors’ practice of selection, use, and instruction. Findings present important implications regarding the design, selection, and use of textbooks.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Öğretim teknolojilerinin yaygınlaşmasına rağmen, ders kitapları öğretmen yetiştirme sürecinde öğretme ve öğrenmenin gerçekleştirilmesi amacıyla sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Ancak üniversite öğrencilerinin kitaplarla olan deneyimlerini anlamaya yönelik pek az çalışma yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Fen Bilgisi Öğretmenliği Programı son sınıfındaki öğretmen adaylarının (N=141) öğretmen yetiştirme sürecinde önerilen ders kitaplarıyla ve öğretim elemanlarının bu kitapları kullanımıyla ilgili deneyimlerini saptamaktır. Nitel yolla toplanan veriler içerik analizi tekniğiyle çözümlenerek temalar elde edilmiştir. Araştırmanın bulguları, öğretmen adaylarının ders kitaplarına yönelik içerik, dil/anlatım, pedagojik ve fiziksel/görsel boyutlarındaki; ders kitaplarını öğretim elemanlarının kullanımıyla ilgili olarak kitap seçimi, kitap kullanımı ve öğretim boyutlarındaki olumlu ve olumsuz deneyimlerini ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bulgular ders kitaplarının tasarımı, seçimi ve kullanımına yönelik önemli ipuçları sunmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-fen-bilgisi-ogretmen-adaylarinin-ogretmen-yetistirme-surecinde-onerilen-ders-kitaplariyla-olan-deneyimleri.pdf
  • 1
114-127
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W. & Marek, E. A. (1992). Understandings and
misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105–120.
Ball, D. L. & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teacher’s guides: A dilemma for
beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18, 401–423.
Besser, D., Stone, G. & Nan, L. (1999). Textbooks and teaching: A lesson from students.
Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 53(4), 4–17.Bishop, B. A. & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in
evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415–427.
Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to
theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Carney, R. N. & Levin J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from
text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5–26.
Daniels, H. & Zemelman, S. (2004). Out with textbooks, in with learning. Educational
leadership, 61(4), 36–40.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ekiz, D. (2003). Eğitimde Araştırma Yöntem ve Metotlarına Giriş. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Elgar, A. G. (2004). Science textbooks for lower secondary schools in Brunei: Issues of gender
equity. INT. J. SCI. EDUC., 26(7), 875–894.
Evans, L. & Davies, K. (2000). No sissy boys here: A content analysis of the representation of
masculinity in elementary school reading textbooks. Sex Roles, 42(3/4), 255–270.
Gauld, C. (1997). It must be true—it’s in the textbook!. Australian Science Teachers Journal,
43(2), 21–25.
Gay, L. R. (1996). Educational research competencies for analysis and application. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gökdere, M. & Keleş, E. (2004). Öğretmen ve Öğrencilerin Fen Bilgisi Ders Kitaplarını
Kullanma Düzeyleri Üzerine Müfredat Değişikliğinin Etkisi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi,
33(161), [Online] http://yayim.meb.gov.tr/dergiler/161/gokdere-keles.htm adresinden
03/01/2008 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
Haggarty, L. & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in
English, French and German classrooms: who gets an opportunity to learn what?
British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567–590.
Helvacıoğlu, F. (1996). Ders Kitaplarında Cinsiyetçilik. İstanbul: Kaynak Yayınları.
Horsley, M. & Lambert, D. (2001). The secret garden of classroom and textbooks. In M.Horsley
(Ed.), The future of textbooks? Research about emerging trends. Sydney: TREAT.
Hubisz, J. (2001). Popular science textbooks found prone to error. Curriculum Review, 40(8), 1–
5.
Iding, M. K. (1997). How analogies foster learning from science texts. Instructional Science, 25,
233–253.
Kearsey, J. & Turner, S. (1999). How useful are the figures in school biology textbooks. Journal
of Biological Education, 33(2), 87–94.
Kılıç, A. & Seven, S. (2004). Konu Alanı Ders Kitabı İncelemesi. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Lubben, F., Campbell, B., Kasanda, C., Kapenda, H., Gaoseb, N. & Kandjeo-Marenga, U.
(2003). Teachers’ use of textbooks’ practice in Namibian science classrooms.
Educational Studies, 29(2/3), 109–124.
Luke, C., De Castell, S. & Luke, A. (1989). Beyond criticism: The authority of the schoolbook.
In S. De Castell, A. Luke & C.Luke (Eds), Language, Authority and Criticism (pp.
245–260). London: Falmer Press.
McCutcheon, G. (1981). How do elementary school teachers plan? Elementary School Journal,
81, 4–23.
Merritt, M. (1992). Socialising multilingualism: Determinants of code switching in Kenyan
primary schools. Journal of Multicultural and Multilingual Development, 13(2), 103–
121.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moulton, J. (1997). How do teachers use textbooks? A review of the research literature. (Tech.
Rep. No:74) U.S. Agency for International Development.
Penney, K., Norris, S. P., Phillips L. M. & Clark, G. (2003). The anatomy of junior high school
science textbooks: An analysis of textual characteristics and a comparison of media
reports of science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology
Education, 3(4), 415–436.Phillips, B. J. & Phillips, F. (2007). Sink or skim: Textbook reading behaviors of introductory
accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(1), 21–44.
Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education
and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
Selander, S. (2005). “How do teachers evaluate, select and use textbooks? Results from surveys
in Norway and Finland.” Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on
Learning and Educational Media (France, October 26–29, 2005).
Stake, E. R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
Stern, L. & Roseman, E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn
important ideas? Findings from project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study: life
science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538–568.
Stylianidou, F., Ormerod, F. & Ogborn, J. (2002). Analysis of science textbook pictures about
energy and pupil’s readings of them. International Journal of Science Education,
24(3), 257–283.
Synder, V. L. & Broadway, F. S. (2004). Queering high school biology textbooks and
pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 617–636.
Turgut, M. F., Baker, D., Cunningham, R. & Piburn, M. (1997). İlköğretim Fen Öğretimi.
YÖK/Dünya Bankası, Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi, Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmen
Eğitimi, Ankara.
Uhlik, K. S. (2004). Midnight at the IDL: Student confusion and textbook error. Journal of
Geography in Higher Education, 28(2), 197–207.
Uzuntiryaki, E. & Boz, Y. (2006). Öğretmen Adaylarının Ders Kitabı Kullanımıyla İlgili
Görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31, 212–220.
Wilkinson, J. (1999). A quantitative analysis of physics textbooks for scientific literacy themes.
Research in Science Education, 29(3), 385–399.
Woodward, A. & Elliott, D. L. (1990). Textbooks: Consensus and Controversy. In D. L. Elliott
& A. Woodward (Ed.), Textbooks and Schooling in the United States: Eighty-ninth
Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Yager, R. E. (1983). The importance of terminology in teaching K-12 science. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 20, 577–588.
Yıldırım, A. (1999). An assessment of high school history textbooks in Turkey: Teachers’ and
students’ perceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American
Educational Research Association (Montreal, Quebec, Canada, April 19–23, 1999).
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara:
Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Zahorik, J. A. (1991). Teaching style and textbooks. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(2),
185–196.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com