TÜRK EĞİTİM VE BİLİMİNDE BİLİMSEL DEVRİM: TESTLER YA DA ÖLÇME ARAÇLARI GÜVENİLİR VE GEÇERLİ DEĞİLDİR

AERA, APA & NCME [American Educational Research Association, American Psychological
Association & National Council on Measurement in Education]. (1999). Standards for
Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational
Association.
Algina, J. (1992). Reliability of Measurement. In Alkin, M. C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of
Educational Research, Vol. 3. (Sixth Edition). New York: Macmillan.
Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Monterey, California:
Brooks/Cole.
Anastasi, A. & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological Testing. (Seventh Edition). Upper Saddle
River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Anastasi, A. (1992). What Counselors Should Know About the Use and Interpretation of
Psychological Tests. Journal of Counseling and Development, Vol. 70, 610-615.
Aycock, T. (1993). It is Incorrect to Say “the Test is Reliable”: A Review of the Literature and
Implications for Research Practice. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED
355 275).
Bademci, V. (2010). Türk Eğitim ve Biliminde Paradigma Değişikliği: Testler veya Ölçekler
Güvenilir ve Geçerli Değildir. Konferans. Düzenleyen: Gazi Üniversitesi, Endüstriyel
Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dekanlığı. Ankara: G.Ü. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi, Resim-İş
Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı Konferans Salonu, 26 Nisan. [Konferansla ilgili haber için;
Gazi Haber, Nisan 2010, Sayı 104, Sayfa 48-49.]
Bademci, V. (2008). Araştırmalarda Ölçme ile İlgili Bazı Büyük Hataları Düzeltmek ve
Eğitimde Yeniden Yapılanmayı Sürdürmek: Güvenirlik, Testlerin Bir Özelliği
Değildir. Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı 22,
50-69. (http://www.esef.gazi.edu.tr/html/yayinlar/22_pdf/22_5.pdf )
Bademci, V. (2007). Ölçme ve Araştırma Yöntembiliminde Paradigma Değişikliği: Testler
Güvenilir Değildir. Ankara: Yenyap Yayınları.
Bademci, V. (2006a). Güvenirliği Doğru Anlamak ve Bazı Klişeleri Yıkmak: Bilinenlerin
Aksine, Cronbach’ın Alfa Katsayısı, Negatif ve –1’den Küçük Olabilir. İnönü
Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 7, Sayı 12, 3-26.
(http://web.inonu.edu.tr/~efdergi/arsiv/bademci.pdf )
Bademci, V. (2006b). Tartışmayı Sonlandırmak: Cronbach’ın Alfa Katsayısı, İki Değerli [0,1]
Ölçümlenmiş Maddeler ile Kullanılabilir. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,
Sayı 13, 438-446. (http://edergi.
atauni.edu.tr/index.php/kkefd/article/viewFile/4116/3940)
Bademci, V. (2006c). Paradigma Değişikliği: Testler Güvenilir Değildir. Konferans.
Düzenleyen: Gazi Üniversitesi, Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dekanlığı.Ankara: G.Ü. Mesleki Eğitim Fakültesi Konferans Salonu, 28 Nisan. [Konferansla
ilgili haber için; Gazi Haber, Nisan 2006, Sayı 66, Sayfa 64.]
Bademci, V. (2005a). Araştırmalarda Ölçme ile İlgili Bazı Büyük Hataları Düzeltmek ve Bir
Reformu Başlatmak: Güvenirlik, Testlerin Bir Özelliği Değildir. Bildiri. Eğitim
Fakültelerinde Yeniden Yapılandırmanın Sonuçları ve Öğretmen Yetiştirme
Sempozyumu. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi, 22-23-24 Eylül.
Bademci, V. (2005b). Testler Güvenilir Değildir: Ölçüm Güvenirliğine Yeterli Dikkat ve
Güvenirlik Çalışmaları İçin Örneklem Büyüklüğü. Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel
Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı 17, 33-45.
(http://www.esef.gazi.edu.tr/html/yayinlar/17_pdf/17_c.pdf )
Bademci, V. (2005c). Hakemlerin Değerlendirmelerindeki Hatalar Üzerine: Fisher’in Z
Dönüşümü ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları İçin Örneklem Büyüklüğü. Gazi Üniversitesi
Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı 17, 46-75.
(http://www.esef.gazi.edu.tr/html/yayinlar/17_pdf/17_d.pdf )
Bademci, V. (2004). Testin Güvenirliği” veya “Test Güvenilirdir” Diye İfade Etmek Doğru
Değildir. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt 2, 367–373.
(http://www.tebd.gazi.edu.tr/c2s3.html )
(http://www.tebd.gazi.edu.tr/arsiv/2004_cilt2/sayi_3/367-373.pdf )
Bademci, V. (2002). Türkiye'deki Okullar Ne İşe Yarar? Türkiye'nin Anomi, Yabancılaşma,
Ekonomik Büyüme, Demokratikleşme Sorunlarına Çözüm Önerisi. Konferans.
Düzenleyen: ESEF Öğrenci Bilimsel Faal. Org. Kom. Ankara: G.Ü.Mesleki Eğitim
Fakültesi Konferans Salonu, 30 Mayıs 2002.
Bademci, V. (2001a). Düşünmenin Öğretilmesi ve Öğretimde Kullanılan Yöntemler-Teknikler.
Konferans. Düzenleyen: TÜRMOB. Bursa: Bursa SMMM Odası Konferans Salonu, 9
Kasım 2001.
Bademci, V. (2001b). Türkiye'deki Okullar Ne İşe Yarar? Konferans. Düzenleyen: Ankara Türk
Telekom Anadolu Teknik L. Ankara: Başkent Öğretmenevi Konferans Salonu, 9
Aralık 2001.
Bademci, V. (2000). Türkiye’deki Okullar Ne İşe Yarar? (Birinci Basım). Ankara: Başkent
Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
Barnes, L. L. B., Harp, D. & Jung, W. S. (2002). Reliability Generalization of Scores on the
Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Educational and Psychological
Measurement, Vol. 62, 603-618.
Bernstein, J. (2006). Albert Einstein. Fiziğin Sınırları. (Çev.: Uzunefe Yazgan, Y.). (Birinci
Basım). Ankara: TÜBİTAK.
Beycioğlu, K. (2007). Alfa Güvenirliği ve Eğitim Araştırmaları. Çağdaş Eğitim, 347, 37-42.
Borsboom, D., Romeijn, J-W. & Wicherts, J. M. (2008). Measurement Invariance Versus
Selection Invariance: Is Fair Selection Possible? Psychological Methods, Vol. 13(2),
75-98.
Brennan, R. L. (Ed.) (2006a). Educational Measurement. (Fourth Edition). Westport, CT:
American Council on Education & Praeger.
Brennan, R. L. (2006b). Perspectives on the Evolution and Future of Educational Measurement.
In Brennan, R. L. (Ed.), Educational Measurement. (Fourth Edition). Westport, CT:
American Council on Education & Praeger.
Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability Theory. New York: Springer.
Brookhart, S. M. & Nitko, A. J. (2008). Assessment and Grading in Classrooms. Upper Saddle
River, New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Buhi, E. R. (2005). Reliability Reporting Practices in Rape Myth Research. Journal of School
Health, Vol. 75, 63- 66.
Capraro, R. M. & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Score Reliability
Across Studies: A Meta-Analytic Reliability Generalization Study. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, Vol. 62, 590-602.
Cebeci, S. (2006). “The Examination of Guidance and Research Centers’ Administrators’
Conflict Management Strategies with the Perceptions of Self and Teachers”.Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ankara: Middle East Technical University, The
Graduate School of Social Sciences.
Chartrand, J. M. & Walsh, W. B. (2001). Career Assessment: Changes and Trends. In Leong, F.
T. L. & Barak, A. (Eds.), Contemporary Models in Vocational Psychology. A Volume
in Honor of Samuel H. Osipow. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Fort Worth:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Cronbach, L. J. (1988). Five Perspectives on the Validity Argument. In Wainer, H. & Braun, H.
I. (Eds.), Test Validity. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cronbach, L. J. (1971). Test Validation. In Thorndike, R. L. (Ed.), Educational Measurement.
(Second Edition). Washington, D. C.: American Council on Education.
Cureton, E. E. (1951). Validity. In Lindquist, E. F. (Ed.), Educational Measurement.
Washington, D. C.: American Council on Education.
Ebel, R. L. & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of Educational Measurement. (Fifth Edition).
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Feldt, L. S. & Brennan, R. L. (1989). Reliability. In Linn, R. L. (Ed.), Educational
Measurement. (Third Edition). New York: American Council on Education &
Macmillan.
Frisbie, D. A. (2005). Measurement 101: Some Fundamentals Revisited. Educational
Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 24(3), 21-28.
Gazi Haber (2010). Türk Eğitim ve Biliminde Paradigma Değişikliği: Testler veya Ölçekler
Güvenilir ve Geçerli Değildir. Nisan 2010, Sayı 104, 48-49.
Gage, N. L. (1963). Paradigms for Research on Teaching. In Gage, N. L. (Ed.), Handbook of
Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand MçNally & Company.
Gray, B. T. (1997). Controversies Regarding the Nature of Score Validity: Still Crazy After All
These Years. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407 414).
Gronlund, N. E. (1998). Assessment of Student Achievement. (Sixth Edition). Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
Gronlund, N. E. & Waugh, C. K. (2009). Assessment of Student Achievement. (Ninth Edition).
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson.
de Gruijter, D. N. M. & van der Kamp, L. J. T. (2008). Statistical Test Theory for the
Behavioral Sciences. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall / CRC
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric Methods. (Second Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford, J. P. & Fruchter, B. (1973). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education
(Fifth Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of Mental Tests. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Guthrie, A. C. (2000). A Review of Coefficient Alpha and Some Basic Tenets of Classical
Measurement Theory. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 438 307).
Hambleton, R. K. & Jones, R. W. (1993). Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item
Response Theory and Their Applications to Test Development. Educational
Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 12 (3), 38-47.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response
Theory. Newbury Park: Sage.
Henson, R. K. (2000). Sacrificing Reliability and Exalting Sampling Error at the Altar of
Parsimony: Some Cautions Concerning Short-Form Test Development. (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. ED 447 211).
Hopkins, K. D. (1998). Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation. (Eight
Edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Hotaman, D. & Yüksel-Şahin, F. (2010). The Effect of Instructors’ Enthusiasm on University
Students’ Level of Achievement. Education and Science [Eğitim ve Bilim], Vol.
35(155), 89-103.
House, E. R. (1977). The Logic of Evaluative Argument. CSE Monograph Series in Evaluation,
No. 7. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation.Kane, M. T. (2008). Terminology, Emphasis, and Utility in Validation. Educational Researcher,
Vol. 37(2), 76-82.
Kane, M. T. (2006a). Validation. In Brennan, R. L. (Ed.), Educational Measurement. (Fourth
Edition). Westport, CT: American Council on Education & Praeger.
Kane, M. (2006b). Content-Related Validity Evidence in Test Development. In Downing S. M.
& Haladyna, T. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Test Development. Mahwah, New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kane, M. (2004). Certification Testing as an Illustration of Argument-Based Validation.
Measurement, Vol. 2(3), 135-170.
Kane, M. T. (2001). Current Concerns in Validity Theory. Journal of Educational
Measurement, Vol. 38, 319-342.
Kane, M. (1996). The Precision of Measurements. Applied Measurement in Education, Vol.
9(4), 355-379.
Kane, M. T. (1992). An Argument-Based Approach to Validity. Psychological Bulletin, Vol.
112(3), 527-535.
Kane, M. T. (1990). An Argument-based Approach to Validation. ACT Research Report Series,
90-13. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT.
Kartal, H. (2009). Öğretmen Adaylarının Uygulama Okullarındaki Zorbalıkla İlgili
Değerlendirmeleri. GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 29(1), 141-172.
Kartal, E. & Pekkanlı, İ. (2011). Yabancı Dil Öğretmen Adaylarının Anadil ve Yabancı Dilde
İnternet Üzerinden Okuma Alanları ve Sıklıkları. International Journal of Human
Sciences, Vol. 8(1), 1316-1326.
Kieffer, K. M. & Reese, R. J. (2002). A Reliability Generalization Study of the Geriatric
Depression Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 62, 969-994.
Kieffer, K. M. (1999). Why Generalizability Theory is Essential and Classical Test Theory is
Often Inadequate. In Thompson, B. (Ed.), Advances in Social Science Methodology,
Volume 5. Stamford, Connecticut: JAI.
Korkmaz, A. (2010). “Vahit Bademci’nin Paradigma Değişikliği Üzerine Bir Araştırma:
“Testler Değil, Ölçümler Güvenilirdir” ”. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
Zonguldak: Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Kubiszyn, T. & Borich, G. (1993). Educational Testing and Measurement. Fourth Edition. New
York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Kuhn, T. S. (1995). Bilimsel Devrimlerin Yapısı. (Çev.: Kuyaş, N.). (Dördüncü Baskı). İstanbul:
Alan Yayıncılık.
Langenfeld, T. E. & Crocker, L. M. (1994). The Evolution of Validity Theory: Public School
Testing, the Courts, and Incompatible Interpretations. Educational Assessment, Vol.
2(2), 149-165.
Le, V-N. & Klein, S. P. (2002). Technical Criteria for Evaluating Tests. In Hamilton, L. S.,
Stecher, B. M. & Klein, S. P. (Eds.), Making Sense of Test-Based Accountability in
Education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Linn, R. L. (2002). Validation of the Uses and Interpretations of Results of State Assessment
and Accountability Systems. In Tindal, G. & Haladyna, T. M. (Eds.), Large-Scale
Assessment Programs for All Students: Validity, Technical Adequacy, and
Impletation. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Linn, R. L. (1995). Assessment-Based Reform: Challanges to Educational Measurement.
Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.
Linn, R. L. & Gronlund, N. E. (2000). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. (Eighth
Edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson.
Linn, R. L. & Miller, M. D. (2005). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. (Ninth Edition).
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill.
Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading,
Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Magnusson, D. (1967). Test Theory. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
McHorney, C. A. (1999). Health Status Assessment Methods for Adults: Accomplishment and
Future Challanges. Annual Review of Public Health, Vol. 20, 309-335.McMillan, J. H. (2007). Classroom Assessment. Principles and Practice for Effective
Instruction. (Fourth Edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Mehrens, W. A. & Lehmann, I. J. (1991). Measurement and Evaluation in Education and
Psychology. (Fourth Edition). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.
Mellenbergh, G. J. (1999). A Note on Simple Gain Score Precision. Applied Psychological
Measurement, Vol. 23, 87-89.
Mellenbergh, G. J. (1996). Measurement Precision in Test Score and Item Response Models.
Psychological Methods, Vol. 1(3), 293-299.
Mellenberg, G. J. & van den Brink, W. (1998). The Measurement of Individual Change.
Psychological Methods, Vol. 3(4), 470-485.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of Psychological Assessment. Validation of Inferences From
Person’s Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning.
American Psychologist, Vol. 50, 741-749.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L. (Ed.), Educational Measurement. (Third Edition).
New York: American Council on Education & Macmillan.
Miller, C. S., Shields, A. L., Campfield, D., Wallace, K. A. & Weiss, R. D. (2007). Substance
Use Scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. An Exploration of
Score Reliability Via Meta-Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 67, 1052-1065.
Mji, A. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Evidence of Score Reliability and Validity of the
Statistical Anxiety Rating Scale Among Technikon Students in South Africa.
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, Vol. 36, 238-251.
Murhpy, K. R. & Davidshofer, C. O. (2001). Psychological Testing. Principles and
Applications. (Fifth Edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Nilsson, J. E., Schmidt, C. K. & Meek, W. D. (2002). Reliability Generalization: An
Examination of the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, Vol. 62, 647-658.
Nitko, A. J. (2001). Educational Assessment of Students. (Third Edition). Upper Saddle River,
New Jersey: Merrill/ Prentice-Hall.
Norton, D. (2001). Giriş. “Yerleşik Düşünceler: Verip Veriştirmek”. Bouvet, J-F. (Haz.),
Ispanaktaki Demir ve Diğer Yerleşik Düşünceler Üzerine. (Çev.; Atuk, E.). İstanbul:
YKY.
Özsoy, S., Keleş, Ö. & Uzun, N. (2009). Fen Bilgisi Eğitimi Alanında Hazırlanan Yüksek Lisans
Tezlerindeki Yöntem ve İstatistiksel Analiz Hataları. 1. Uluslararası Türkiye Eğitim
Araştırmaları Kongresi. Çanakkale: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, 1-3 Mayıs.
(http://oc.eab.org.tr/egtconf/pdfkitap/pdf/238.pdf) 11 Kasım 2009’da alınmıştır.
Pedhazur, E. J. & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, Design, and Analysis. An Integrated
Approach. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B. & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and Assessment in
Education. (Second Edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson.
Rouse, S. V. (2007). Using Reliability Generalization Methods to Explore Measurement Error:
An Illustration Using the MMPI-2 PSY-5 Scales. Journal of Personality Assessment,
Vol. 88(3), 264-275.
Ragan, B. G. & Kang, M. (2005). Reliability: Current Issues and Concerns. Athletic Therapy
Today, Vol. 10(6), 30-33.
Rowley, G. R. (1976). The Reliability of Observational Measures. American Educational
Research Journal, Vol. 13, 51-59.
Sawilowsky, S. S. (2000). Psychometrics Versus Datametrics: Comment on Vacha-Haase’s
“Reliability Generalization” Method and Some EPM Editorial Policies. Educational
and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 60, 157-173.
Sayın, S. (2010). Bilimsel Araştırmalarda Yapılan İstatistiksel ve Yöntembilimsel Hatalar-II:
Grafik, Tablo ve Gösterim Hataları. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt 8(1), 117-143.
Sayın, S. (2008). Bilimsel Araştırmalarda Yapılan Bazı İstatistiksel ve Yöntembilimsel Hatalar-
III: Güvenirlik Kestirimlerine Yönelik Hatalar. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi
Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı 15, 53-69.Sever, E. (2008). “Öğrenme Stilleri: İlköğretim 6-8. Sınıf Öğrencilerine Yönelik Bir Ölçek
Geliştirme Çalışması”. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Aydın: Adnan Menderes
Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Serdar, Z. (2001). Thomas Kuhn ve Bilim Savaşları. (Çev.: Kılıç, E.). İstanbul: Everest.
Sireci, S. G. (2005). Unlabeling the Disabled: A Perspective on Flagging Scores From
Accommodated Test Administrations. Educational Researcher, Vol. 34(1), 3-12.
Sireci, S. G. & Parker, P. (2006). Validity on Trial: Psychometric and Legal Conceptualizations
of Validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 25(3), 27-34.
Stanley, J. C. (1971). Reliability. In Thorndike, R. L. (Ed.), Educational Measurement. (Second
Edition). Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.
Streiner, D. L. & Norman, G. R. (1995). Health Measurement Scales. (Second Edition). Oxford:
Oxford University Pres.
Suen, H. K. (1990). Principles of Test Theories. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Superfine, B. M. (2004). At the Intersection of Law and Psychometrics: Explaining the Validity
Clause of No Child Left Behind. Journal of Law & Education, Vol. 33(4), 475-513.
Thompson, B. (Ed.) (2003). Score Reliability. Contemporary Thinking on Reliability Issues.
Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Thompson, B. (2001). Significance, Effect Sizes, Stepwise Methods and Other Issues: Strong
Arguments Move the Field. The Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 70, 80-93.
Thompson, B. & Vacha-Haase, T. (2000). Psychometrics is Datametrics: The Test is Not
Reliable. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 60, 174-195.
Thorndike, R. L. (1982). Applied Psychometrics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Topdemir, H. G. (2002). Kuhn ve Bilimsel Devrimlerin Yapısı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme.
Felsefe Dünyası, Sayı 36, 45-62.
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument. (Updated Edition). New York: Cambridge.
Toulmin, S. E. (1964). The Uses of Argument. London: Cambridge.
Toulmin, S., Rieke, R. & Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning. New York:
Macmillan.
Traub, R. E. (1994). Reliability for the Social Sciences. Theory and Applications. Thousand
Oaks: Sage.
Traub, R. R. & Rowley, G. L. (1991). Understanding Reliability. Educational
Measurement:Issues and Practice, Vol. 10(1), 37-45.
Tyson, E. H., Dulmus, C. N. & Wodarski, J. S. (2002). Assessing Violent Behavior. In Rapp-
Paglicci, Roberts, A. R. & Wodarski, J. S. (Eds.). Handbook of Violence. New York:
John Wiley & Sons.
Vacha-Haase, T. (1998). Reliability Generalization: Exploring Variance in Measurement Error
Affecting Score Reliability Across Studies. Educational and Psychological
Measurement, Vol. 58, 6-20.
Vacha-Haase, T., Kogan L. R., Tani, C. R. & Woodal, R. A. (2001). Reliability Generalization:
Exploring Variation of Reliability Coefficients of MMPI Clinical Scales Scores.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 61, 45-59.
van der Linden, W. J. (2005). Classical Test Theory. In Kempf-Leonard, K. (Ed.), Encyclopedia
of Social Measurement. Oxford: Elsevier.
Vassar, M. & Hale, W. (2009). Reliability Reporting Across Studies Using the Buss Durkee
Hostility Inventory. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 24, 20-37.
Victorson, D., Barocas, J., Song, J. & Cella, D. (2008). Reliability Across Studies From the
Functional Assessment of Cancer Theraphy-General (FACT-G) and Its Subscales: A
Reliability Generalization. Quality of Life Research, Vol. 17, 1137-1146.
Wasserman, J. D. & Bracken, B. A. (2003). Psychometric Characteristics of Assessment
Procedures. In Weiner, I. B., Graham, J. R. & Naglieri, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of
Psychology. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Witta, E. L. & Daniel, L. G. (1998). The Reliability and Validity of Test Scores: Are Editorial
Policy Changes Reflected in Journal Articles? (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED 422 366).Worthen, B. R., White, K. R., Fan, X. & Sudweeks, R. R. (1999). Measurement and Assessment
in Schools. (Second Edition). New York: Longman.
Yin, P. & Fan, X. (2000). Assessing the Reliability of Beck Depression Inventory Scores:
Reliability Generalization Across Studies. Educational and Psychological
Measurement, Vol. 60, 201-223.