Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Character revelation and dialogue interpretation through Politeness theory and Conversation analysis in dramatic discourse: The case of Woody Allen’s Death Knocks

Journal Name:

  • Dil ve Edebiyat Eğitimi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
This article intends to demonstrate how Politeness Theory and Conversation Analysis can be applied to discover the personality traits of characters in dramatic discourse and hence interpret the theme of plays. To this end, Nat, the character in Death Knocks by Woody Allen, has been put in the spotlight. The application of Politeness Theory to this play revealed that how reversing social power roles of characters can create irony which in turn can lead us to the theme of the play. Adjacency pairs, topic shifts and topics of the conversation also revealed important information about the character and the theme of the play.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 5.pdf
  • 6
43-54
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Abdesslem, H. (2001) Politeness strategies in the discourse of play: A case study. Journal of Literary Semantics, (30), 111-138.
Bennison, N. (2002) Accessing character through conversation. In Culpeper J, Short M and Verdonk P. (eds.) Exploring the Language of Play: From Text to Context. New York: Routledge, pp. 67-82.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, R. (2010). Methodologies for stylistic analysis: Practices and pedagogies. In McIntyre D. and Busse B. (eds.) Language and style. New York: Palgrave macmillan, pp. 55-68.
Carter, R. and Simpson, P. (2005) Language, discourse and literature. NewYork: Routledge.
Culpeper, J. (2002). (Im)politeness in dramatic dialogue. In In Culpeper J, Short M and Verdonk P. (eds.) Exploring the Language of Play: From Text to Context. New York: Routledge, pp. 83-95.
Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(3), 219-234.
Herman, V. (1995). Dramatic discourse: Dialogue as interaction in plays. London: Routledge.
Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (1999). The discourse reader. London: Routledge.
2013, Dil ve Edebiyat Eğitimi Dergisi, 2(6), 43-54.
2013, Journal of Language and Literature Education, 2(6), 43-54.
54
Laver, J. (1975). Communicative functions of phatic communion. In Kendon, A, Harris, R. M.and Key, M.R. (eds). Organisation of behaviour in face to face interaction. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 215-40.
Leech, G. N. (1985). Stylistics. In Van Dijk, T. A. (ed.). Discourse and literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
Simpson, P. (1997). Language through literature. New York: Routledge.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com