Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

KÜRESEL TİCARET AKTÖRÜ OLARAK AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ: ZORLUKLAR VE FIRSATLAR

THE EUROPEAN UNION AS A GLOBAL TRADE ACTOR: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

Journal Name:

  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Bu makale Avrupa Birliği’nin, geçiş dönemi olarak nitelendirilebilecek bir dönemde, ticaret politikaları açısından karşı karşıya kaldığı zorlukları ve fırsatları incelemektedir. Makale öncelikle AB’nin ticaret politikası bağlamındaki “aktörlüğünün” temellerini değerlendirecek ve özelikle AB’de politika gelişimini etkileyen üç mantık olan ‘iç” mantık, ‘dış’ mantık ve ‘kimlik’ mantığını ortaya koymaya çalışacaktır. Bu mantıklar arasındaki etkileşim, AB’nin küresel ticaret ilişkilerine girme biçimlerini yönlendirme ve çeşitli alanlardaki tansiyon ve çelişkiler için hesap verebilirlik olarak görülmektedir. Makalenin ilerleyen bölümleri AB’nin dünya ticaretinde değişen konumu, mevcut ticaret gündemi ve daha kapsamlı ticari politika için oluşturduğu yeni gündem ile birlikte AB’ nin ticaret politikasında sergilediği imajla ilgilenmektedir. Makale, AB ticaret politikasının gelecekteki olası konularını, üç mantığın yeniden değerlendirilmesi ve bunların birbiri ile etkileşimini gözden geçirerek sonlanmaktadır
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
This article reviews the challenges and opportunities confronting the European Union in its trade and broader commercial policies, in what is a period of transition. The article begins by evaluating the foundations of the EU’s ‘actorness’ in trade policy, and in particular by identifying three underlying logics of EU policy development: the ‘internal’ logic, the ‘external’ logic and the ‘identity’ logic. The interaction between these logics is seen as driving the ways in which the EU enters into global trade relationships, and as accounting for tensions and contradictions in a number of areas. Subsequent sections of the article deal with the images presented by the EU in trade policy, with the EU’s changing position in world trade, with the current trade agenda and the new agenda of broader commercial policy. The article finishes with a review of potential future issues in EU trade and commercial policies, and with a reassessment of the ‘three logics’ and their interaction.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kuresel-ticaret-aktoru-olarak-avrupa-birligi-zorluklar-firsatlar.pdf
  • 2
89-106
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Bretherton, C. and Vogler, J. (2006). The European Union as a Global
Actor, 2
nd
Edition. London: Routledge.
Carbone, M. (2010 forthcoming). The EU and the Developing World:
Partnership, Poverty, Politicisation. In C. Hill and M. Smith (Eds.) International
Relations and the European Union, 2
nd
Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Damro, C. (2006a). Institutions, Ideas and a Leadership Gap: The EU’s
Role in Multilateral Competition Policy. In O. Elgström and M. Smith (Eds.) The
European Union’s Roles in International Politics: Concepts and Analysis: 208-25.
London: Routledge.
Damro, C. (2006b). The New Trade Politics and EU Competition Policy:
Shopping for Convergence and Cooperation. Journal of European Public Policy
13(6): 867-86.
Elsig, M. (2007). The EU’s Choice of Regulatory Venues for Trade
Negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4): 927-48.
European Commission (2006). Global Europe: Competing in the World.
Brussels: European Commission.
Ginsberg, R. (1989). Foreign Policy Actions of the European Union: The
Politics of Scale. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Gnesotto, N. and Grevi, G. (2006). The New Global Puzzle: What World
for the EU in 2025? Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.
Grevi, G. and de Vasconcelos, A. (Eds.) (2008). Partnerships for Effective
Multilateralism: EU Relations with Brazil, China, India and Russia. Paris:
European Union Institute for Security Studies.
Hardacre, A. (2010). The Rise and Fall of Interregionalism in EU External
Relations. Dordrecht: Republic of Letters Publishing.
Hardacre, A. and Smith, M. (2009). The EU and the Diplomacy of
Complex Interregionalism. Hague Journal of Diplomacy 4(2): 167-88.
Hocking, B. and Smith, M. (2007). Beyond Foreign Economic Policy: The
United States, the Single European Market and the Changing World Economy.
London: Cassell/Pinter.
Jacoby, W. and Meunier, S. (2010). Europe and the Management of
Globalization. Journal of European Public Policy 17(3): 299-317.
Kerremans, B. (2006). Proactive Policy Entrepreneur or Risk Minimizer?
A Principal-agent interpretation of the EU’s Role in the WTO. In O. Elgström and
M. Smith (Eds.) The European Union’s Roles in International Politics: Concepts
and Analysis: 172-88. London: Routledge.
McGuire, S. (2006). No More Euro-Champions? The Interaction of EU
Industrial and Trade Policies. Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 887-905.
Smith, M. DEÜ SBE Dergisi, Cilt:12, Sayı:2
106
Meunier, S. and Nicolaidis, K. (2005). The European Union as a Trade
Power. In C. Hill and M. Smith (Eds.) International Relations and the European
Union: 247-69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meunier, S. and Nicolaidis, K. (2006). The European Union as a Conflicted
Trade Power. Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 906-25.
Meunier, S. and Nicolaidis, K. (2010 forthcoming). The European Union
as a Trade Power. In C. Hill and M. Smith (Eds.) International Relations and the
European Union, 2
nd
Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sbragia, A. (2010). The EU, the US and Trade Policy: Competitive
Interdependence in the Management of Globalization. Journal of European Public
Policy 17(3): 368-82.
Smith, M. (2004). The European Union as a Trade Policy Actor. In B.
Hocking and S. McGuire (Eds.) Trade Politics, 2
nd
edition: 289-303. London:
Routledge.
Smith, M. (2009). Between Soft Power and a Hard Place: EU Foreign and
Security Policy Between the Islamic World and the United States. International
Politics 46(5): 596-615.
Smith, M. and Xie, H. (2009a). The European Union, China and the united
States: Complex Interdependence and Bi-Multilateralism in Commercial Policy. In
G. Wiessala, J. Wilson and P. Taneja (Eds.) The European Union and China:
Interests and Dilemmas: 167-86. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Smith, M. and Xie, H. (2009b). The European Union’s Strategic
Partnership with China: How Much Strategy? How Much Partnership? Paper
presented to the UACES Annual/Research Conference, Angers, France:
September.
Young, A. (2006). Punching its Weight? The EU’s Use of WTO Dispute
Resolution. In O. Elgström and M. Smith (Eds.) The European Union’s Roles in
International Politics: Concepts and Analysis: 189-207. London: Routledge.
Young, A. (2007). Trade Politics Ain’t What it Used to Be. Journal of
Common Market Studies 45(4): 789-812.
Young, A. and Peterson, J. (2006). The EU and the New Trade Politics.
Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 795-814.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com