Agterbosch, S., Meertens, R. M., ve Vermeulen, W. J. (2009). The relative
importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power
projects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13 (2): 393-405.
Agterbosch, S., Vermeulen, W., ve Glasbergen, P. (2004). Implementation
of wind energy in the Netherlands: the importance of the social-institutional
setting. Energy Policy, 32 (18): 2049-2066.
Aitken, M. (2010a). A three-dimensional view of public participation in
Scottish land-use planning: empowerment or social control? Planning Theory, 9
(3): 248-264.
Aitken, M. (2010b). Why we still don't understand the social aspects of
wind power: a critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy, 38
(4): 1834-1841.
Aitken, M. (2010c). Wind power and community benefits: challenges and
opportunities. Energy Policy, 38 (10): 6066-6075.
Aitken, M. (2009). Wind power planning controversies and the
construction of 'expert' and 'lay' knowledges. Science as Culture, 18 (1): 47-64.
Aitken, M., McDonald, S., ve Strachan, P. (2008). Locating 'power' in
wind power planning processes: the (not so) influential role of local objectors.
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51 (6): 777-799.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the
American Institute of Planners, 36 (4): 216-224.
Barry, J., Ellis, G., ve Robinson, C. (2008). Cool rationalities and hot air: a
rhetorical approach to understanding debates on renewable energy. Global
Environmental Politics, 8 (2): 67-98.
Beddoe, M., ve Chamberlin, A. (2003). Avoiding confrontation: securing
planning permission for on-shore wind energy developments in England:
comments from a wind energy developer. Planning Practice & Research, 18 (1): 3-
17.
Bell, D., Gray, T., ve Haggett, C. (2005). The 'social gap' in wind farm
siting decisions: explanations and policy responses. Environmental Politics, 14 (4):
460-477.
Yenilenebilir Enerji Girişimlerinin… DEU Journal of GSSS, Vol: 15, Issue: 4
687
Cass, N., Walker, G., ve Devine-Wright, P. (2010). Good neighbours,
public relations and bribes: the politics and perceptions of community benefit
provision in renewable energy development in the UK. Journal of Environmental
Policy and Planning, 12 (3): 255-275.
Christensen, P., ve Lund, H. (1998). Conflicting views of sustainability: the
case of wind power and nature conservation in Denmark. European Environment, 8
(1): 1-6.
Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking 'participation': models, meanings and
practices. Community Development Journal, 43 (3): 269-283.
Cowell, R., Bristow, G., ve Munday, M. (2011). Acceptance, acceptability
and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy
development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54 (4): 539-
557.
Devine-Wright, P. (2005). Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated
framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy, 8
(2): 125-139.
Devine-Wright, P. (2011a). Enhancing local distintiveness fosters public
acceptance of tidal energy: a UK case study. Energy Policy, 39 (1): 83-93.
Devine-Wright, P. (2011b). Public engagement with large-scale renewable
energy technologies: breaking the cycle of NIMBYism. WIRES Climate Change, 2
(1): 19-26.
Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: the role of place
attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of
Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19 (6): 426-441.
Devine-Wright, P., & Howes, Y. (2010). Disruption to place attachment
and the protection of restorative environments: a wind energy case study. Journal
of Environmental Psychology, 30 (3): 271-280.
Dinçer, İ. (2000). Renewable energy and sustainable development: a
crucial review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4 (2): 157-175.
DTI (2003). Our energy future - creating a low carbon economy. Norwich:
Department of Trade and Industry, The Stationary Office.
Elliott, D. (2000). Renewable energy and sustainable futures. Futures, 32
(3-4): 261-274.
Ellis, G., Barry, J., ve Robinson, C. (2007). Many ways to say 'no',
different ways to say 'yes': applying q-methodology to understand public
acceptance of wind farm proposals. Journal of Environmental Planning and
Management, 50 (4): 517-551.
Peker, Z. DEÜ SBE Dergisi, Cilt: 15, Sayı: 4
688
Ellis, G., Cowell, R., Warren, C., Strachan, P., ve Szarka, J. (2009).
Expanding wind power: a problem of planning, or of perception? Planning Theory
& Practice, 10 (4): 523-532.
Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey
of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 15 (2): 226-
243.
Flavin, C., ve Dunn, S. (1999). A new energy paradigm for the 21st
century. Journal of International Affairs, 53 (1): 167-190.
Gross, C. (2007). Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: the
application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social
acceptance. Energy Policy, 35 (5): 2727-2736.
Haggett, C. (2009). Public engagement in planning for renewable energy.
S. Davoudi, J. Crawford, ve A. Mehmood (Der.) Planning for climate change:
İçinde 297-307. London, UK: Earthscan.
Haggett, C. (2004). Tilting at windmills? The attitude-behaviour gap in
renewable energy conflicts. London: ESRC.
Hammarlund, K. (2002). Society and wind power in Sweden. M. J.
Pasqualetti, P. Gipe, ve R. W. Righter (Der.) Wind power in view: energy
landscapes in a crowded world: İçinde 101-114. San Diego, USA: Academic Press.
Hillier, J. (2003). 'Agon'izing over consensus: why Habermasian ideals
cannot be 'real'. Planning Theory, 2 (1): 37-59.
Hindmarsh, R. (2010). Wind farms and community engagement in
Australia: a critical analysis for policy learning. East Asian Science, Technology
and Society: An International Journal, 4 (4): 541-563.
Hindmarsh, R., ve Matthews, C. (2008). Deliberative speak at the turbine
face: community engagement, wind farms, and renewable energy transitions, in
Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 10 (3): 217-232.
Khan, J. (2001). "Siting Conflicts in Renewable Energy Projects in
Sweden: Experience From the Siting of a Biogas Plant". New Perspectives on
Siting Controversy Konferansı, 17-20 Mayıs, Glumslöv, İsveç.
Loring, J. M. (2007). Wind energy planning in England, Wales and
Denmark: factors influencing project success. Energy Policy, 35 (4): 2648-2660.
McLachlan, C. (2009). 'You don't do a chemistry experiment in your best
china': symbolic interpretations of place and technology in a wave energy case.
Energy Policy, 37 (12): 5342-5350.
Yenilenebilir Enerji Girişimlerinin… DEU Journal of GSSS, Vol: 15, Issue: 4
689
Moomaw, W., Yamba, F., Kamimoto, M., Maurice, L., Nyboer, J., Urama,
K., Weir, T. (2011). Renewable energy and climate change. O. Edenhofer, R.
Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P.
Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, C.von Stechow (Eds) IPCC special report on
renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation: İçinde 161-208.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Social
Research, 66 (3): 745-758.
ODPM (2004). Planning policy statement 22: renewable energy. Norwich:
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Crown Copyright.
Owens, S. (2004). Siting, sustainable development and social priorities.
Journal of Risk Research, 7 (2): 101-114.
Pløger, J. (2004). Strife: urban planning and agonism. Planning Theory, 3
(1): 71-92.
Rowe, G., ve Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement
mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 30 (2): 251-290.
Rydin, Y. (2007). Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning
theory. Planning Theory, 6 (1): 52-68.
Rydin, Y., ve Pennington, M. (2000). Public participation and local
environmental planning: the collective action problem and the potential of social
capital. Local Environment, 5 (2): 153-169.
Sathaye, J., Bouille, D., Biswas, D., Crabbe, P., Geng, L., Hall, D., Imura,
H., Jaffe, A., Michaelis, L., Peszko, G., Verbruggen, A., Worrell, E., Yamba, F.
(2001). Barriers, opportunities, and market potential of technologies and practices.
B. Metz (Der.) Climate change 2001: mitigation, contribution of working group III
to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change:
İçinde 345-398. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
SE (2007). Scottish planning policy 6: renewable energy. Scotland:
Scottish Executive, Development Department, Crown copyright.
Short, L. (2002). Wind power and English landscape identity. M. J.
Pasqualetti, P. Gipe, ve R. W. Righter (Der.) Wind power in view: energy
landscapes in a crowded world: İçinde 43-58. San Diego: Academic Press.
Shove, E. (1998). Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: theories of
technology transfer and energy in buildings. Energy Policy, 26 (15): 1105-1112.
Szarka, J. (2004). Wind power, discourse coalitions and climate change:
breaking the stalemate?. European Environment, 14 (6): 317-330.
Peker, Z. DEÜ SBE Dergisi, Cilt: 15, Sayı: 4
690
Toke, D. (2005). Explaining wind power planning outcomes: Some
findings from a study in England and Wales. Energy Policy, 33 (12): 1527-1539.
Toke, D., Breukers, S., ve Wolsink, M. (2008). Wind power deployment
outcomes: how can we account for the differences? Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews, 12 (4): 1129-1147.
Tsoutsos, T. D., ve Stamboulis, Y. A. (2005). The sustainable diffusion of
renewable energy technologies as an example of an innovation-focused policy.
Technovation, 25 (7): 753-761.
Upreti, B. R. (2004). Conflict over biomass energy development in the
United Kingdom: some observations and lessons from England and Wales. Energy
Policy, 32 (6): 785-800.
Van der Horst, D. (2007). NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of
location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting
controversies. Energy Policy, 35 (5): 2705-2714.
WAG (2005). Planning policy Wales technical advice note 8: planning for
renewable energy. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government, Crown copyright.
Walker, G. (1995). Renewable energy and the public. Land Use Policy, 12
(1): 49-59.
Walker, G., ve Devine-Wright, P. (2008). Community renewable energy:
what should it mean? Energy Policy, 36 (2): 497-500.
Warren, C. R., ve McFadyen, M. (2010). Does community ownership
affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland.
Land Use Policy, 27 (2): 204-213.
Warren, C. R., Lumsden, C., O'Dowd, S., ve Birnie, R. V. (2005). 'Green
on green': public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. Journal of
Environmental Planning and Management, 48 (6): 853-875.
White, S. C. (1996). Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of
participation. Development in Practice, 6 (1): 6-15.
Wolsink, M. (2010). Contested environmental policy infrastructure: sociopolitical
acceptance of renewable energy, water, and waste facilities.
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30 (5): 302-311.
Wolsink, M. (2007a). Planning of renewables schemes: deliberative and
fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of noncooperation.
Energy Policy, 35 (5): 2692-2704.
Wolsink, M. (2000). Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional
capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renewable Energy, 21 (1):
49-64.
Yenilenebilir Enerji Girişimlerinin… DEU Journal of GSSS, Vol: 15, Issue: 4
691
Wolsink, M. (2007b). Wind power implementation: the nature of public
attitudes: equity and fairness instead of 'backyard motives'. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11 (6): 1188-1207.
Wolsink, M., ve Breukers, S. (2010). Contrasting the core beliefs regarding
the effective implementation of wind power. An international study of stakeholder
perspectives. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53 (5): 535-
558.
Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., ve Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance
of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35
(5): 2683-2691.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
