Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Tedarik Zinciri Esnekliğine Yönelik Bütünleşik Bir Ölçüm Modeli

An Integrated Measurement Model of Supply Chain Flexibility

Journal Name:

  • Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Capability of a supply chain to adapt its activities to rapid changing markets and customer requirements is defined as supply chain flexibility. It is an inevitable challenge for a supply chain to improve its flexibility in order to improve and maintain competitiveness. In literature, flexibility concept is frequently evaluated from the functional or business unit flexibility point of view. Overall supply chain flexibility does not take much consideration. Hence, this study tried to develop a measurement model to measure overall integrated supply chain flexibility. Measurement model integrates and measures flexibility in three levels of a supply chain (central business unit, first tier supplier and first tier customer) with five dimensions.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Tedarik zincirlerinin değişen pazarlara ve müşteri isteklerine uyum yeteneğinin ölçüsü tedarik zinciri esnekliği olarak adlandırılmaktadır. Rekabet gücünü arttırmak ve korumak isteyen tedarik zincirlerinin, esneklik düzeylerini geliştirmeleri gerekmektedir. Yazında esneklik kavramı çoğunlukla fonksiyonel açıdan ya da işletme esnekliği olarak ele alınmaktadır. Tedarik zincirinin tümünü göz önünde bulunduran bütünleşik bir tedarik zinciri esnekliği kavramı üzerine yapılan çalışmalara daha az rastlanmaktadır. Bu nedenle bu çalışmada tedarik zinciri esnekliğini bütünleşik olarak ölçebilecek bir ölçüm modeli geliştirilmeye çalışılmıştır. Geliştirilen model, tedarik zinciri esnekliğini üç düzeyde (merkez işletme, birinci düzey tedarikçi ve birinci düzey müşteri) ve beş boyutta ölçmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_2054_11_pp_511-523.pdf
  • 4
511-523
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Bal, C. ve Özdamar, K. (2004) “Eksik Gözlem Sorununun
Türetilmiş Veri Setleri Yardımıyla Çözümlenmesi”
Osmangazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi,
26(2):67-76.
Duclos, L. K., Vokurka, R. J. ve Lummus, R. R.
(2003) “A Conceptual Model of Supply Chain Flexibility”
Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(6):446-
456.
Garavelli, A. C. (2003) “Flexibility Configurations
for the Supply Chain Management” International Journal
of Production Economics, 85:141-153.
Giachettia, R. E., Martinez, L. D., Sáenz, O. A. and
Chen, C. S. (2003) “Analysis of the Structural Measures
of Flexibility and Agility Using A Measurement Theoretical
Framework” International Journal of Production
Economics, 86:47-62.
Giunipero, L. C., Denslow, D. and Eltantawy, R.
(2005) “Purchasing/Supply Chain Management Flexibility:
Moving to An Entrepreneurial Skill Set” Industrial
Marketing Management, 34:602-613.
Gong, Z. (2008) “An Economic Evaluation Model of
Supply Chain Flexibility” European Journal of Operational
Research, 184: 745-758.
Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C. ve Tirtirogu, E. (2001)
“Performance Measures and Metrics in A Supply Chain
Environment” International Journal of Operations & Production
Management, 21(1/2): 71-87.
Howell, D.C. (2009), “Treatment of Missing Data”,
http://www.uvm.edu/~dhowell/StatPages/More_Stuff/
Missing_Data/Missing.html, (02.09.2009)
Kline, R. B. (2005) “Principles and Practice of Structural
Equation Modelling”, 2nd Edition, New York, USA,
The Guilford Press.
Kumar, V., Fantazy, K. A., Kumar, U. ve Boyle, T. A.
(2006) “Implementation and Management Framework
for Supply Chain Flexibility” Journal of Enterprise Information
Management, 19(3):303-319.
Lokupitiya, R. S., Lokupitiya, E. ve Paustian, K.
(2006) “Comparison of Missing Value Imputation Methods
For Crop Yield Data” Environmetrics, 26:339–349.
Lummus, R. R., Duclos, L. K. ve Vokurka, R. J.
(2003) “Supply Chain Flexibility: Building a New Model”
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,
4(1):1-13.
Lummus, R. R., Vokurka, R. J. ve Duclos, L. K.
(2005) “Delphi Study on Supply Chain Flexibility” International
Journal of Production Research, 43(13):2687–
2708.
Nachtigall, C., Kroehne, U., Funke, F. ve Steyer, R.
(2003) “(Why) Should We Use SEM? Pros and Cons of
Structural Equation Modeling” Methods of Psychological
Research Online, 8(22):1-22
Nilchiani, R. ve Hastings, D. E. (2007) “Measuring
the Value of Flexibility in Space Systems: A Six-Element
Framework” Systems Engineering, 10(1):26-44.
Oberoi, J. S., Khamba, J. S. ve Kiran, R. (2007)
“Impact of New Technology and Sourcing Practices in
Managing Tactical and Strategic Manufacturing Flexibilities”
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,
8(3):1-14.
Oğuzlar, A. (2001) “Alan Araştırmalarında Kayıp
Değer Problemi ve Çözüm Önerileri” Çukurova Üniversitesi
V. Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu,
Adana.
Radhakrishnan, A. (2005) “Impact of Usage of Inter-
Organizational Information Systems on Supply Chain
Capabilities” Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Clemson,
USA, Graduate School of Clemson University.
Sadler, I. (2007) Logistics and Supply Chain Integration,
London, UK, Sage Publications Ltd.
Sánchez, A. M. ve Pérez, M. P. (2005) “Supply Chain
Flexibility and Firm Performance: A Conceptual Model
and Empirical Study in the Automotive Industry” International
Journal of Operations & Production Management,
25(7):681-700.
Sawhney, R. (2006) “Interplay Between Uncertainty
and Flexibility Across The Value-Chain: Towards
A Transformation Model of Manufacturing Flexibility”
Journal of Operations Management, 24:476-493.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com