Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Türk İmalat Sanayi Sektörlerinin Stratejik Önem Analizi

Strategic Importance Analysis of Turkish Manufacturing Industry

Journal Name:

  • Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, strategic sectors of Turkish Manufacturing Industry has been analaysed according to 2002 input-output tables by using Chenery-Watanabe, Rasmussen-Ghosh, Dietzenbacher and Laumas coefficient models. Although strategic importance have been defined acording to linkage coefficient in the all models, there has been some differences between calculation of coefficients in each model. Chenery-Watanabe, Rasmussen-Ghosh, Dietzenbacher methods take into account sectoral linkages while Laumas method focuses on final demand and value added effects. Therefore some differencess has been observed between emprical finding of methods about strategic importance. According to the empirical findings of the study; textile sector have been found strategic in all methods through strong sectoral linkages, huge final demand and value added effects. With regard to Laumas method which gives comprehensive framework to evaluation of strategic importance, 5 sector have been found strategic while 2 of 17 manufacturing industry have been found strong according to forward linkages. Strategic sectors are; food-beverage, textile, garment, chemical products and machinery products. The sectors which have strong forward linkage are non metallic mineral products and basic metal industry.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çalışmada en son yayınlanmış olan 2002 yılı girdi-çıktı tabloları kullanılarak, Türk imalat sanayi stratejik önem yönünden Chenery-Watanabe, Rasmussen-Ghosh, Dietzenbacher ve Laumas katsayı yöntemlerine göre incelenmiştir. Çalışmada kullanılan tüm modeller stratejik önemi bağlantı katsayılarına göre tanımlamakla birlikte, katsayıların hesaplanması konusunda yöntemler arasında farklılıklar bulunmaktadır. Chenery-Watanabe, Rasmussen-Ghosh, Dietzenbacher yöntemlerinde sektörel bağlantılar, Laumas yönteminde ise sektörel bağlantılarla birlikte sektörlerin nihai talep ve katma değer içindeki payı dikkate alınmakta, sonuç olarak ta modellerin amprik bulguları arasında farklılıklar görülmektedir. Tekstil ürünleri, hem güçlü sektörel bağlantıları hem de nihai talep ve katma değer içindeki yüksek payından dolayı tüm katsayı modellerinde stratejik çıkmıştır. Sektörel bağlantı ve ekonomi içindeki payını dikkate alarak oldukça kapsamlı bir stratejik önem analizine olanak sağlayan Laumas yöntemine göre; 17 imalat sektörünün 5 tanesinin stratejik, 2 tanesinin ileri bağlantılarının güçlü olduğu ampirik sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Stratejik sektörler; gıda, tekstil, hazır giyim, kimyasal madde ve makine eşya sanayidir. İleri bağlantıları güçlü sektörler ise metalik olmayan diğer mineral ürünler ve ana metal sanayidir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_2054_11_pp_525-535.pdf
  • 4
525-535
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Andreosso-O’Callaghan, B. ve Yue, G. (2000) “Intersectoral
Linkages and Key Sectors in China, 1987–1997.
An Application of Input-output Linkage Analysis” Papers
of the 13th International Conference on Input-Output
Techniques, Ağustos 21-25, İtalya.
Augustinovics, M. (1970) “Methods of International
and Intertemporal Comparisons of Structures” in Carter,
A.B. and Brody, A. (eds.), Contributions to Input-output
Analysis, Amsterdam, North-Holland P.C.
Aydın, H. (2007) “An Analysis of the Input-Output
Interindustry Linkages in the Turkish Economy” Paper
of the 16th International Conference on Input-Output
Techniques, Temmuz 2-7, İstanbul, Turkey.
Aydoğuş, O. (1999) “Girdi Çıktı Modellerine Giriş”,
Ankara, Gazi Yayınevi.
Beyers, W. B. (1976) “Empirical Identification of
Key Sectors: Some Further Evidence” Environment and
Planning A, 8: 231- 236.
Chenery, H. B. and Watanabe, T. (1958) “International
Comparison of Production, Econometrica”
26(4):487-521.
Demir, N. ve Kula, M. (2008) “Türkiye Ekonomisinin
Sektörler Arası Bağlantılarında İhracat-İthalat İlişkileri”
Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Dış Ticaret Politikaları,
3(1-2):85–116.
Dietzenbacher, E. (1992) “The Measurement of Inter-
industry Linkages, Key Sectors in the Netherlands”
Economic Modelling, 9(4):419–437.
Dietzenbacher, E. ve B. Los, (2000) “Externalities
Of R&D Expenditures” Economic Systems Research,
14(4):407-425.
Ghosh, A. (1958) “Input-Output Approach to an
Allocative System” Economica, 25(1):58–64.
Groenewold, N., Hagger, A. and Madden, J.R.
(1993) “Measuring Industry Importance an Australian
Application” The Annals Regional Science, 27:175–182.
Han, E., Tosunoğlu, T. ve Özsoy, C. (2011) “Türk
İmalat Sanayinde Geri ve İleri Bağlantılar: Girdi-Çıktı
Tablosuna Dayalı Yapısal Bir Çözümleme” TİSK Akademi,
6(11):104-129.
Hirschman, A.O. (1958) The Strategy of Economic
Development, New Haven, Yale University Press.
Jones, L.P. (1976) “The Measurement of Hirschmanian
Linkages” Quarterly Journal of Economics,
90(2):323-333.
Kogelschatz, H. (1988) “On the Identification of
Key Sectors: Critical Theoretical and Empirical Analysis
of Key Sector Indices” Eichhorn et al.(eds.) Measurement
in Economics, Heidelberg, Physica-Verlag.
Kula, M. (2008) “Supply - Use And Input-Output
Tables, Backward And Forward Lınkages of The Turkısh
Economy” The 16th Inforum World Conference, September
01–05. Northern Cyprus.
Laumas, P.S. (1975) “ Key Sectors in Some Underdeveloped
Countries” Kyklos 28(1):62–79.
Leontief, W. (1966) Input Output Economics 2nd.
Edition, Newyork, Oxford University Press.
Los, B. (2004) “Identification of Strategic Industries:
A Dynamic Perspective” Papers in Regional Science,
83:669–698.
Miller, R. E. ve Blair, P. D. (1985) “Input-Output
Analysis: Foundations and Extensions” Englewood Cliffs,
Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
Oosterhaven, J. (2008) “A New Approach To The Selection
of Key Sectors: Net Forward and Net Backward
Linkages” Paper Of The International Input-Output
Meeting on Managing the Environment: Input-Output
& Environment, July 9–11, Spain.
Rasmussen, P.N. (1958) Studies in Intersectorial Relations,
Amsterdam, North-Holland Publishing Company.
Schultz, S. (1977) Approaches to Identifying Key
Sectors Empirically by Means of Input output analysis,
Journal of development Studies, 14(1):77-96.
TÜİK (2011) http://www.tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.
do?tb_id=58&ust_id=16 Ulusal Hesaplar: 2002 GirdiÇıktı
Tabloları, Erişim Tarihi: 01.02.2011.
Yotopoulos, P.A. ve Nugent, J.B. (1973) “A Balanced
Growth Version of the Linkage Hypothesis, A Test”
The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(2):157–171.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com