Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

HÜMANİSTİK BİR YAKLAŞIMLA ÖRTÜLÜ BİLGİ ANALİZİ: ÖRTÜLÜ BİLGİ GELİŞİMİ VE PAYLAŞIMINDA DUYGUSAL ZEKA İLE BEDEN DİLİNİN ROLÜ VE STRATEJİK KULLANIM YOLLARI

Journal Name:

  • Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2003
Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper reports on a conceptual analysis of tacit knowledge and the relations between tacit knowledge and emotional intelligence and body language. The objective of this paper is to emphasize the important role of emotional intelligence and body language in development and sharing process of tacit knowledege and demonstrate strategic usage ways of these two elements for tacit knowledge.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale bilginin kavramsal bir analiziyle birlikte örtülü bilgi, duygusal zeka ve beden dili arasındaki ilişkileri ele almaktadır. Makalenin amacı duygusal zeka ve beden dilinin örtülü bilginin gelişim ve paylaşım sürecindeki rolünü vurgulamak ve bunların örtülü bilgi bağlamındaki stratejik kullanım yollarını ortaya koymaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-humanistik-bir-yaklasimla-ortulu-bilgi-analizi-ortulu-bilgi-gelisimi-paylasiminda-duygusal-zeka-ile-beden-dilinin-rolu-stratejik-kullanim-yollari.pdf
  • 1
58-66
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Boiral, Olivier (2002), “Tacit Knowledge and
Environmental Management“, Long Range
Planning, Vol. 35: 291-317.
Dumas, Angela ve Fentem, Andrew (1998),
“Totemics: New Metaphor Techniques to Manage
Knowledge From Discovery to Storage and
Retrieval”, Technovation, Vol. 18, 513-521.
Goleman, Daniel (2001), Duygusal Zeka, (Çev.
Banu Seçkin Yüksel), Varlık Yayınları, İstanbul.
Hall, Richard ve Andriani, Pierpalo (2003),
“Managing Knowledge Associated with
Innovation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol.
56: 145-152.
Johannessen, Jon A.–Olsen, Bjorn ve Olaisen,
Johan (1999), “Aspects of Innovation Theory Based
on Knowledge Management”, International
Journal of Information Management, Vol. 19: 121-
139.
Johannessen, Jon A.-Olsen, Bjorn ve Olaisen, Johan
(2001), “Mismanagement of Tacit Knowledge: The
Impotance of Tacit Knowledge, The Danger of
Information Technology and What to Do About It”,
International Journal of Information Management,
Vol 21: 3-20.
Karahan, Kasım (2001), “Hizmet Pazarlamasında
Müşteri Tatmin Düzeylerini Etkileyen Bir Faktör
Olarak Duygusal Zekanın (EQ) Rolü”, Pazarlama
Dünyası, Y. 15, S. 3: 19-24.
Koskinen, Kaj U. (2000), “Tacit Knowledge as a
Promoter of Project Success”, European Journal of
Purchasing And Supply Management, Vol. 6: 41-
47.
Koskinen, Kaj U. ve Vanharanta, Hannu (2002),
“The Role of Tacit Knowledge In Innovation
Process of Small Technology Companies”, Int. J.
Production Economics, Vol. 80: 57-64.
Lubit, Roy (2001), “Tacit Knowledge and
Knowledge Management: The Keys to Sustainable
Competitive Advantage”, Organizational
Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 4: 164-178.
Malone, David (2002), “Knowledge Management:
A Model For Organizational Learning”,
International Journal of Accounting Information
Systems, Vol. 3: 111-123.
Mascitelli, Ronald (2000), “From Experience:
Harnessing Tacit Knowledge to Achieve
Breakthrough Innovation”, J. Prod. Innovation
Management, Vol. 17.
Nonaka, Ikujiro-Toyama, Ryoko ve Konno, Noboru
(2000), “SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified
Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation”, Long
Range Planning, Vol. 33: 5-34.
Putti, Joseph M. ve Aryee, S. (1990),.
“Communication in Organizations”, Group &
Organization Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, 44.
Ropo, Arja ve Parvainen, Jaana (2001),
“Leadership and Bodily Knowledge in Expert
Organizations: Epistemological Rethinking”,
Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 17: 1-
18.
Schulz, Martin ve JOBE, Lloyd A. (2001),
“Codification and Tacitness as Knowledge
66
Management Studies: An Emprical Exploration”,
Journal of High Technology Management
Research, Vol. 12: 139-165.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com