Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Evrim, Bilim ve Eğitim Üzerine

On Evolution, Science and Education

Journal Name:

  • Ege Ünivesitesi Ege Eğitim Dergisi/Ege Eğitim Online

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of the present paper is to provide readers with a concise discussion about the influence of conservative and religious ideologies over scientific issues and science education in general, and evolutionary research program and evolution education in particular. In order to achieve this goal, first, it was attempted to delineate the present situation. The picture obtained reflected a marked decrease in public acceptance of evolution by natural selection, and depreciation of scientific efforts. Then, the underlying factors of the present picture were elaborated by its historical, philosophical, logical, and scientific dimensions. Finally, the issues involved in science education and teaching evolution in schools were discussed, and possible solutions and alternative models were proposed
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Sunulan derleme ile, özellikle, son 20-30 yıldır dünyanın birçok ülkesinde güç kazanan tutucu akımların genelde bilim ve bilim eğitimi, özelde ise, evrimsel araştırma programları ve evrim eğitimi üzerindeki etkilerinin tartışılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amacı gerçekleştirmek üzere, öncelikle var olan durum resmedilmeye çalışılmış, sonuçta evrimsel yaklaşımlara ilişkin genel kabul düzeyinde azalmanın olduğu ve bilimsel bilginin toplum nazarında değer kaybetmeye başladığı saptanmıştır. Söz konusu tablonun altında yatan olası nedenler, tarihsel, felsefi, mantıksal ve bilimsel bir bakış açısıyla irdelenmiştir. Daha sonra da bilim eğitimindeki sorunlar ve güçlükler üzerinde durulmuş, bunların giderilmesine ilişkin önerilerde bulunulmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-evrim-bilim-egitim-uzerine.pdf
  • 7
1-21
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Kaynakça
2. Alters, B. J., & Alters, S. M. (2001). Defending evolution in the classroom: A guide to the
3. creation/evolution controversy. Boston: Jones and Barlett Publishers.
4. Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education.
5. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 56(10), 1891-1901.
6. Apaydın, Z., & Sürmeli, H. (2006). Üniversite öğrencilerinin evrim teorisiyle ilgili
7. tutumları. (Ed. Ö. Genç). Evrim, bilim ve eğitim. İstanbul: Dünya Yayıncılık.
8. Ateş, K. (2006). Evrim neden ABD ve Türkiye’de az benimseniyor? Bilim ve Gelecek, 31,
9. 25-29.
10. Ayas, M. R. & Tümer, G. (1994). Liseler için din kültürü ve ahlak bilgisi I: MEB Yayınları,
11. 118, Ders Kitapları Dizisi, 100.
12. Ayer, A. J., & Copleston, F. C. (1965). Logical Pozitivism: A Debate. (Ed. P. Edwards ve
13. Arthur Pap), A Modern introduction to philosophy. New York: The Free Press.
14. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC:
15. National Academy Press.
16. Brickhouse, N. W., Dagher, Z. R., Letts, W. J., & Shipman, H. L. (2000). Diversity of
17. students’s views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and
18. religion in astronomy course. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 37, 340-362.
19. Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker: why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe
20. without design. London: W. W. Norton Company, Inc.
21. Demirsoy, A. (2005). Kalıtım ve evrim. Ankara: Meteksan.
22. Edwards, A. (1972). Likelihood. Cambridge University Press.
23. Erkunt, H. (2006). Evrim teorisini anlamazsak ne olur? (Ed. Ö. Genç). Evrim, bilim ve
24. eğitim. İstanbul: Dünya Yayıncılık.
25. Freeman, S., & Herron, J. C. (1999). Evolutionary analysis. New York: Prentice Hall, Inc.
26. Futuyma, D. J. (1982). Science on trial: The case for evolution. New York: Pantheon Books.
27. Gould, S. J. (1980). Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging? Paleobiology, 6,
28. 119-130.
29. Gould, S. J. (1983). Hen’s teeth and horse’s toes. New York: W. W. Norton.
30. Greene, E. D. (1990). The logic of university students’ misunderstandings of natural
31. selection. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 27, 875-885.
32. Gross, L. (2006). Scientific illiteracy and the partisan takeover of biology. PloS Biology,
33. 4(5), 680-683.
34. Güven, T., Köksal, F., Öncü, C., Erdoğan, İ., Acar, Ö., Demirci, Ş., Toğral, A. ve Şimşek, S.
35. (1994). Liseler için biyoloji I: MEB Yayınları 602, Ders Kitapları Dizisi, 223.
36. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousandstudent
37. survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American
38. Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74.
39. Holden, C. (1995). Alabama schools disclaim evolution. Science, 270, 1305.
40. Interacademy Panel (June, 2006). IAP Statement on the teaching of evolution. Australian
41. Academy of Science, 20 Ekim 2006’da http://www.science.org.au/reports/IAPEvolution.
42. pdf adresinden.
43. Kaiser, J. (1995). Dutch debate tests on evolution. Science, 269, 911.
44. Kence, A. (1994). Biyoloji eğitiminde evrim ve yaratılışçılık. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi
45. Bilimsel Toplantı Serileri, 2, 43-47.
46. Kitcher, P. (1982). Abusing science: The case against creationism. MIT Press.
47. Koray, S. (2001). Safsata anketi. Bilim ve Ütopya Dergisi, 88, 10-16.
48. Lawson, A. E. (1994). Research on the acquisition of science knowledge: Epitemological
49. foundation of cognition, (Ed. D.L. Gabel), Handbook of research on science teaching and
50. learning. New York: Macmillan.
51. Lawson, A. E., & Weser, J. (1990). The rejection of nonscientific beliefs about life: Effects
52. of instruction and resoning skills. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 27, 589-606.
53. Maritain, J. (1947). A New Approach to God. (Ed. R.K. Anshen), Our emergent civilization.
54. New York: Harper and Brothers.
55. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological tought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
56. Press.
57. Mazur, E. (1996). Peer instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
58. McKeachie, W. J. (1994). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and
59. university teachers. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.
60. Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science,
61. 313(5788), 765-766.
62. Nehm, R. H. (2006). Faith-based evolution education? Bioscience, 56(8), 638-639.
63. Nelson, C. E. (2000). Effective strategies for teaching evolution and other controversial topics.
64. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
65. Popper, K. (1974). Darwinism as a metaphysical research program. (Ed. P. Schilpp), The
66. philosophy of Karl Popper. Open Court.
67. Ruacan, Ş. (2006) Evrim eğitimi bildirgesi üzerine. Bilim ve Gelecek, 31, 24.
68. Russell, B., & Copleston, F. C. (1965). The Existence of God: A Debate. (Ed. P. Edwards
69. ve Arthur Pap), A Modern introduction to philosophy. New York: The Free Press.
70. Schlafly, P. (2006). Critism of evolution can’t be silenced. Human Events Online: The
71. National Conservative Weekly, August 21, 19 Ekim 2006’da
72. http://www.humanevents.com/ adresinden.
73. Schmidt, K. (1996). Creationists evolve new strategy. Science, 273, 420-422.
74. Scott, E. C. (1994). The struggle for the schools. Natural History, 7, 10-13.
75. Scott, E. C. (2005). Evolution vs. Creationism: An introduction. Berkeley, CA: University of
76. California Press.
77. Şeçkin, O., & Okçabol, R. (2006). Küreselleşme, eğitim ve evrim. (Ed. Ö. Genç). Evrim,
78. bilim ve eğitim. İstanbul: Dünya Yayıncılık.
79. Sinclair, A., Pendarvis, M. P., & Bladwin, B. (1997). The relation between colloge zoology
80. students’ beliefs about evolutionary theory and religion. Journal of Research and
81. Developments in Education, 30, 118-125.
82. Sober, E. (2000). Philosophy of biology: Dimensions of philosophy series. Boulder, Colorado:
83. Westview Press, Perseus Books Group.
84. Somel, R. N. (2007, Mayıs). Cumhuriyet tarihinde, biyolojik evrim eğitiminin tarihsel ve
85. sosyolojik bir değerlendirmesi. Bildiri, Biyoloji Eğitiminde Evrim Sempozyumu, İnönü
86. Üniversitesi, Malatya’da sunulmuştur.
87. Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1997). Effects of small-group learning on
88. undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology, a meta-analysis.
89. National Institute for Science Education, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin
90. Tekeli, İ. (2003). Eğitim üzerine düşünmek. TÜBA Dergisi, 5.
91. Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for
92. teaching science. (Ed. D.L.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com