Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

YABANCI DİL ÖĞRENİMİNDE STRATEJİ SEÇİMİ: DOĞAL VEYA EĞİTSEL DİL EDİNİMİ

FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGY CHOICE: NATURALISTIC VERSUS INSTRUCTED LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

Journal Name:

  • Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2007

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study explores whether there are differences in the choice of language learning strategy and in the frequency of its use in the concurrent acquisition of two foreign languages, one being learned in a tutored and the other in a non-tutored manner. Specifically, it investigates the tutored learning of English in a formal setting and the non-tutored acquisition of Turkish in a non-formal setting by international university students at Bogaziçi University. The results indicate that although the students make use of all types of learning strategies irrespective of the learning context, compensation as a direct learning strategy seems to be the one most frequently deployed in both tutored and naturalistic learning. On the other hand, a significant difference is observed in indirect strategy preference with respect to learning context: in tutored English learning students make more use of metacognitive strategies, whereas in non-tutored Turkish acquisition they often use social strategies.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalısma, biri dogal yolla digeri egitime dayalı olarak iki yabancı dili aynı anda ögrenenlerde dil ögrenim stratejileri seçimi ve kullanım frekansına özgü farklar olup olmadıgını arastırmaktadır. Daha somut olarak arastırma, Bogaziçi Üniversitesi’ndeki uluslararası ögrencilerin 0ngilizceyi sınıf ortamında, Türkçeyi ise sokak ortamında ögrenmelerini irdelemektedir. Bulgular, ögrenim baglamı ne olursa olsun ögrencilerin dogrudan bir strateji türü olan telafi stratejisini yeglediklerini, ancak dolaylı strateji türlerinde baglamla iliskili anlamlı degiskenlikler oldugunu sergilemektedir. Buna göre egitime dayalı 0ngilizce ögreniminde bilisötesi strateji kullanımı yeglenirken, dogal Türkçe ediniminde sosyal stratejiler ön plana çıkmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 47-388-1-pb.pdf
  • 1
4-11
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Bremmer, S. (1999). Language learning strategies and language proficiency:
Investigating the relationship in Hong Kong. Canadian Modern
Language Review, 55 (4): 490-514.
Cummins, J. (1980). The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency:
Implications for bilingual education and optimal age issue. TESOL
Quarterly, 14 (2): 175-187.
Ellis, R. (1994). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Hsiao, T. Y., and Oxford, R. L. ( 2002). Comparing theories of language
learning strategies: A confirmatory factor analysis. Modern Language
Journal, 86 (3): 368-383.
Macaro, E. (2004). Fourteen features of a language learner strategy. Working
Paper #4. Oxford: Department of Educational Studies, University of
Oxford.
O’Malley, C., and Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second
Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher
Should Know. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
Oxford, R. L., and Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language
learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy
inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23 (1): 1-23.
Wenden, A., and Rubin, J., Eds. (1987). Learner Strategies in Language
Learning. Cambridge: Prentice Hall International.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com