Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ETİMOLOJİ SUNUMU YOLUYLA SÖZCÜK SÖZCÜK AKILDA TUTMAYI ARTTIRMA

PROMOTING VOCABULARY RETENTION THROUGH ETYMOLOGY PRESENTATION

Journal Name:

  • Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Failing to remember previously encountered words is one of the commonly reported complaints of both EFL and ESL learners. Among the variety of commonly used vocabulary reinforcing techniques, making students aware of etymological accounts of words is a relatively underresearched area in the literature. The present study, therefore, aims at exploring the effect of presenting etymological accounts of 30 low frequent words on short- and long-term vocabulary retention of EFL learners. The participants (n=32) were members of two intermediate intact classes randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. While both groups were asked to look up the meaning of the words in their dictionaries, the participants in the experimental group received a short instruction on the etymologies of the words. The results of both immediate and delayed posttests demonstrated the mnemonic efficacy of etymology presentation. The paper comes to an end by offering a justification of the linkage between the obtained results and the existing psycholinguistic theories.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Hem EFL hem de ESL öğrencileri, daha önce karşılaşmış oldukları sözcükleri akılda tutamamaktan şikayet edegelmişlerdir. Sıklıkla kullanılan sözcük ezberleme teknikleri arasında, öğrencilerin sözcüklerin etimolojik yapılarınının farkında olmasını sağlamak, diğer tekniklere kıyasla üzerinde daha az araştırma yapılmış bir tekniktir. Bu sebeple, bu çalışmada 30 adet sıklık düzeyi düşük sözcüğün etimolojik ögelerinin sunulmasının, EFL öğrencilerinin sözcükleri kısa ve uzun vadede hafızalarında tutabilmeleri üzerindeki etkisi araştırılmıştır. Sayısı 32 olan katılımcılar, deney ve kontrol gruplarına rastlantısal olarak atanmış 2 orta düzey dil sınıfının öğrencileridir. Her iki gruptaki öğrencilerden, sözcüklerin anlamlarını sözlükten bakmaları istenmiş olmakla birlikte, deney grubunda yer alan katılımcılara ek olarak, sözcüklerin etimolojik yapıları ile ilgili kısa bir açıklamada bulunulmuştur. Kısa süreli ve uzun süreli sontestler etimolojik açıklamanın hafıza üzerindeki yararını ortaya koymuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_173599_7_pp_111-123.pdf
  • 1
111-123
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Boers, F. (2001). Remembering figurative idioms by hypothesizing about their origins. Prospect, 16, 35 – 43.
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H. (2007). Presenting figurative idioms with a touch of etymology: more than mere mnemonics? Language Teaching Research, 11, 43 – 62.
Bogaards, P. (2001). Lexical units and the learning of foreign language vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 321 – 343.
Carter, R. (1998). Vocabulary: Applied linguistics perspectives (2nd edition). London: Routledge.
Cermak, L., & Craik, F. (1979). Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Decarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 285–299). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
Meara, P. (2002). The rediscovery of vocabulary. Second Language Research, 18, 393 – 407.Morimoto, S., & Loewen, S. (2007). A comparison of the effects of image schema-based instruction and translation-based instruction on the acquisition of L2 polysemous words. Language Teaching Research, 11, 347 – 372.
Nassaji, H. (2007). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 57, 79 – 113.
Nation, P. (1997). L1 and L2 use in the classroom: a systematic approach. TESL Reporter, 30(2), 19 – 27.
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 57, 79 – 113.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 174-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ramachandran, Sh. D., & Rahim H. A. (2004). Meaning recall and retention: The impact of translation method on elementary level learners’ vocabulary learning. RELC Journal, 35, 161 – 178.
Read, J. (2004). Research in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 146 – 141.
Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd edition). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Schmitt N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329 – 363.
Sokmen, J. A. (1997). Current trends in teaching second language vocabulary. In N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 237–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trench, R. (1851). The study of words. London: John Parker.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com