Buradasınız

Avrupa Birliğinin Beşinci Genişlemesi: Ana Temalar ve Faktörler

The Fifth Enlargement of the European Union: Major Themes and Factors

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
While focusing on the fifth enlargement, this study tries to analyze the main dynamics, important issues, dimensions and factors in the process; the most important effects, expected by the current members and candidates, from the enlargement process are also analyzed. For the current members, the enlargement meant access to a larger market, investment opportunities and employment. The Enlargement, as a painful and humiliating process wherein the burden of transformation left to the candidates, contained implied threats. Those who did not accomplish the compliance faced with the possibility of being labeled as ‘non‐Europe’. The theoretical and historical background of the enlargement, the dominant characteristics and historical and emotional factors are explained in brief. The supply and demand side of the enlargement and the negative effects of EU’s not having a clear perspective about its objective are analyzed. In the fifth enlargement process the members were initially divided as drivers and brakemen. The mechanism of the enlargement was fairly strictly based on conditionality. The members also evaluated the possible repercussions of saying “no” to the enlargement.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, AB’nin beşinci genişlemesi üzerine yoğunlaşarak temel dinamikler, önem verilen konular, boyutlar ve faktörler; eski üyeler ve adaylar açısından genişlemenin beklenen en önemli etkileri, genel hatlarıyla incelenmeye çalışılmaktadır. Mevcut üyeler için, genişleme, daha büyük bir pazar, yatırım fırsatları ve istihdam anlamına geliyordu. Genişleme, dönüşümün esas yükünün adaylara bırakıldığı sancılı ve aşağılayıcı bir süreç olarak gizli tehditler içeriyordu. Adaptasyon sürecini başaramayanlar ‘Avrupalı değil’ diye tanımlanabilecekti. Genişlemenin teorik ve tarihsel arka planı, genişlemenin belirgin özellikleri; tarihsel ve duygusal boyutlar kısaca açıklanmıştır. Beşinci genişlemenin arz ve talep yönüne bakılmış, AB’nin temel amaçları konusunda kesin bir fikrinin oluşmamış olmasının olumsuz etkileri irdelenmiştir. Beşinci genişleme sürecinde eski üyeler genişleme taraftarı olanlar ve gönülsüzler olarak ikiye ayrılmışlardır. Genişlemenin mekanizması sıkı ve katı bir şekilde şarta bağlılık ilkesine dayanmıştır. Mevcut üyelerce, genişlemeye “hayır” demenin maliyeti de değerlendirilmiştir.
201-235

REFERENCES

References: 

Avrupa Komisyonu (2009), “Views on European Union Enlargement” Flash
Eurobarometer 257.
Avrupa Komisyonu (2010), “Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2010‐
2011”, COM(2010) 660
Arnason, J. P. (2000), “Communism and Modernity” Daedalus, 129 (1), 61‐90.
Avery, G. vd (ed) (2009), Enlarging the European Union: Effects on the new
member states and the EU Brüksel, Trans European Policy Studies Association
Avrupa Komisyonu (2005), “2005 Enlargement Strategy Paper” COM (2005) 561
final
Avrupa Komisyonu, (2006), “Enlargement, two years after: an economic
evaluation” (2006) European Commıssıon Directorate‐General For Economic And
Financial Affairs Occasıonal Papers 24
(http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/index_en.htm).
Barysch, K. (2006), “Is Enlargement Doomed?,” Public Policy Research, 13 (2), 78‐
85.
Blokker, P. (2008), “From a Central European Identity to Post‐Nationality?”,
European Journal of Social Theory, 11(2), 257–274.
Boyka, S. (2005), “The European Union as a Security Actor” , World Affairs, 168
(2), 51‐66.
Davies, N. (1996), Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Neve, Jan‐Emmanuel (2007), “The European Onion? How Differentiated
Integration is Reshaping the EU”, Journal of European Integration, 29 (4), 503‐
521.
EB 64 TR (2006), “Eurobarometer 64: AB Kamuoyu Araştırması: Türkiye”)
(Eurobarometer araştırmalarına
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm adresinden ulaşılabilir).
EB 67 ( 2007) Eurobarometer 67, Public Opinion In The European Union First
Results.
EB 251 (2006) Special Eurobarometer 251, “Future of Europe”.
Font, N. (2006) “Why the European Union Gave Turkey the Green Light”, Journal
of Contemporary European Studies, 14 (2), 197–212.
ESKİŞEHİR 230 OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ İİBF DERGİSİ
Further Enlargement, 2006 Evidence given to the House of Lords EU Select
Committee, ‘The further enlargement of the EU: threat or opportunity?’
www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldeucom/273/273.pdf
Fukuyama, F. (1989), "The End of History", National Interest, 16 (Yaz), 3‐ 18.
Collard‐Wexler, Simon (2006), “Integration Under Anarchy: Neorealism and the
European Union”, European Journal of International Relations, 12, 397‐432.
Delhey, J. (2007) “Do Enlargements Make the European Union Less Cohesive? An
Analysis of Trust between EU Nationalities”, JCMS: Journal of Common Market
Studies, 45(2), 253–279.
Gilbert, M. (2008), “Narrating the Process: Questioning the Progressive Story of
European Integration” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46 (3) 641–662.
Hain, P. (2003), “Why Bigger is Better: Enlargement and the Future of Europe”,
New Economy, 10 (2), 95‐100.
Hettne, B. (2002), “The Europeanisation of Europe: Endogenous and Exogenous
Dimensions”, Journal of European Integration, 24 (4), 325‐340.
Higashino, A. (2004), “For the Sake of ‘Peace and Security’? The Role of Security in
the European Enlargement Eastwards”, Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the
Nordic International Studies Association, 39 (4), 347–368.
Hooghe, L. ve Marks, G. (2008), “European Union?”, West European Politics, 31
(1), 108‐ 129.
House of Commons (2007), “EU Enlargement: the Western Balkans” Research
Paper 07/27 14.03.2007.
Ibryamova N. (2005), “The Eastern Enlargement of the European Union: Interests,
Power and Norms”, Mami Universitesi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
İçener, E.vd. (2010), “Continuity and change in the European Union’s approach to
enlargement Turkey and Central and Eastern Europe compared”, Southeast
European and Black Sea Studies 10 (2), 207–223.
Karabeshkin, L. A. ve Spechler, D. R. (2007), “EU and NATO Enlargement: Russia's
Expectations, Responses and Options for the Future”, European Security,16 (3)
,307‐328.
Karp J. A. ve Bowler, S. (2006), “Broadening and deepening or broadening versus
deepening:The question of enlargement and Europe’s ‘hesitant Europeans’”
European Journal of Political Research 45: 369–390,
EKİM 2011 231
Kavalalı M. (2005), Avrupa Birliği’nin Genişleme Süreci: AB’nin Merkezi Doğu Avrupa
ve Batı Balkan Ülkeleri İle İlişkileri, Ankara: DPT Müsteşarlığı.
Kok, W. (2003), “Avrupa Birliği’nin Genişlemesi: Başarılar ve Zorluklar”,
http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/enlargement_process/past_enlar
gements/communication_strategy/report_kok_tr.pdf (erişim, 11. 08. 2010).
Kopenhag (1993), “Zirve Sonuç Bildirgesi” (www.consilium.europa.eu/
ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/72921.pdf).
Kornai J. (2006), “The great transformation of Central Eastern Europe Success and
disappointment”, Economics of Transition, 14 (2), 207–244.
Lane, D. (2007), “Post‐Communist States and the European Union” Journal of
Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 23 (4), 461–477.
Mattli, W. ve Plümper, T. (2002), “The demand‐side politics of EU enlargement:
Democracy and the application for EU membership”, Journal of European Public
Policy, 9 (4), 550‐574.
Mayer, H. (2008), “The Long Legacy of Dorian Gray: Why the European Union
Needs to Redefine its Role in Global Affairs”, Journal of European Integration, 30
(1), 7‐25.
Mayhew, A. (2007), Enlargement Of The European Union: An Analysis Of The
Negotiations For Countries Of The Western Balkans, Organisation for Economic
Co‐operation and Development, Sigma Paper NO. 37 2007.
McKay, D. (1996) Rush to Union: Understanding the European Federal Bargain,
Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Missiroli, A.(2003), “EU Enlargement and CFSP/ESDP”, Journal of European
Integration, 25 (1): 1‐16.
Moravcsik, A.ve Vachudova, M. A. (2003), “National Interests, State Power, and
EU Enlargement Perspectives” East European Politics and Societies, 17 (1), 42–57.
O’Brennan, John (2006), “Bringing Geopolitics Back In’: Exploring the Security
Dimension of the 2004 Eastern Enlargement of the European Union”, Cambridge
Review of International Affairs, 19 (1), 155‐169.
Panagiotou, R. (2008), “FYROM's transition: on the road to Europe?”, Journal of
Southern Europe and the Balkans, 10 (1), 47‐ 64.
Pavlovaite, I. (2003), “Being European by Joining Europe: Accession and identity
politics in Lithuania” Cambridge Review of International Affairs,16 (2), 239‐255.
ESKİŞEHİR 232 OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ İİBF DERGİSİ
Pridham G. (2006), “European Union Accession Dynamics and Democratization in
Central and Eastern Europe: Past and Future Perspectives”, Government and
Opposition, 41 ( 3), 373–400.
Pridham G. (2007a), “Change and Continuity in the European Union's Political
Conditionality: Aims, Approach, and Priorities”, Democratization, 14 (3), 446 –
471.
Pridham G. (2007b) “Political Elites, Domestic Politics and Democratic
Convergence with the European Union: The Case of Romania during Accession”,
Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 23 (4), 525 – 547.
Pollack, M. A. (2009) “Europe united? The impact of the EU’s eastern
enlargement, five years on” European View (2009) 8:239–254
Rehn, O. ”Europe's Next Frontiers” Helsinki, 27.10. 2006
Lecture at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs, SPEECH/08/184
http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/06/654&form
at=HTML&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
Ross, G. (2008), “What do ‘Europeans’ Think? Analyses of the European Union's
Current Crisis by European Elites”, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 46
(2) , 389–412
Schimmelfennig, F. (1999), “The Double Puzzle of EU Enlargement Liberal Norms,
Rhetorical Action, and the Decision to Expand to the East”, ARENA Working
Papers WP 99/15
Schmidt, V. A. (2007), “Trapped by their ideas: French lites' discourses of
European integration and globalization” Journal of European Public Policy, 14 (7),
992 – 1009.
Schimmelfennig, F. ve Sedelmeier, U. (2002), “Theorizing EU Enlargement:
Research Focus, Hypotheses and the State of Research”, Journal of European
Public Policy, 9(4): 500–528.
Settembri, P. (2007), “The surgery succeeded. Has the patient died? The impact
of enlargement on the European Union”, Jean Monnet Working Paper 04/07.
www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/07/070401.html ( erişim 29. 11. 2010).
Sjursen, H. (2002) “Why expand? The question of legitimacy and justification in
the EU’s enlargement policy”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 491–513.
Sjursen, H. (2006), “What kind of power?”, Journal of European Public Policy, 13
(2), 169‐ 181.
EKİM 2011 233
Sjursen H. (2008), “Enlargement in perspective: The EU’s quest for identity” ARENA
Working Paper No. 5.
Solana, J. (2001), “Enlargement of the European Union — Opportunity or Threat?’
On The Occasion Of The Ninth "European Lecture" Utrecht Theater 19.06. 2001.
http://www.consilium.europa.eu/cms3_applications/applications/solana/det...
sp?cmsid=358&BID=107&DocID=66956&insite=1
Stawarska, R. (1999), “EU enlargement from the Polish Perspective”, Journal of
European Public Policy, 6 (5), 822‐838.
Thomson, R. (2009) “Actor alignments in the European Union before and after
enlargement” European Journal of Political Research 48: 756–781.
Tsoukalis L. (2006), “The JCMS Lecture: Managing Diversity and Change in the
European Union” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44 (1), 1–15.
Varbanova L. (2007), “The European Union Enlargement Process: Culture in
between National Policies and European Priorities” The Journal of Arts
Management, Law, and Society, 37 (1) 48‐64
Wiarda H. J. (2005), “Where Does Europe End Now? Expanding Europe's Frontiers
and the Dilemmas of Enlargement and Identity” The Brown Journal Of World
Affairs 12 (1), 89‐98.
Wiener, A. (2002), “Finality vs. Enlargement Constitutive Practices and Opposing
Rationales in the Reconstruction of Europe” NYU School of Law, Jean Monnet
Working Paper 8/02.
Zielonka, J. (2007), “Plurilateral Governance in the Enlarged European Union”
JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45 (1), 187–209.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com