Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

İklim Değişikliği ve Dağıtıcı Adalet

Climate Change and Distributive Justice

Journal Name:

  • Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Global climate change from the perspective of ethics is defined by many scholars as the biggest problem of distributive justice encountering the world. Governments construe the notion of justice in terms of their political positions or national interests in the climate negotiations. Because the burden sharing agreed in the Kyoto Protocol is unsatisfactory for almost every country in terms of justice, it seems that just distribution of costs and benefits of climate change is one of the most important matters of discussion in the post-Kyoto climate negotiations. This study aims to analyze climate change as a problem of distributive justice. The analysis focus on three dimensions of distributive justice; the recipients of distribution (developed countries, developing countries, present generations, future generations, companies, individuals etc.), the item of distribution (atmosphere, emission rights, trust of future generations to the present generation, costs of mitigation or adaptation), and the process of distribution (fair decision making processes in global climate change regime etc.).The study concludes that it is extremely difficult to reach an agreement based on principles of distributive justice in the post-Kyoto climate negotiations because application of different justice principles leads to different outcomes for the Parties.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Etik açıdan küresel iklim değişikliği, birçok bilim insanı tarafından dünyanın karşı karşıya olduğu en büyük dağıtıcı adalet (tevzi-i adalet) sorunu olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Devletler, iklim müzakerelerinde “adalet” kavramını kendi siyasal konumlarına veya ulusal çıkarlarına göre yorumlamaktadır. Kyoto Protokolü ile ulaşılan yük dağılımı adalet açısından neredeyse hiçbir ülkeyi tatmin etmediği için iklim değişikliğinin fayda ve maliyetlerinin adil dağılımı, Kyoto sonrası iklim müzakerelerinin en önemli tartışma konularından birini oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmada küresel iklim değişikliğinin dağıtıcı adalet sorunu olarak analiz edilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu analiz, dağıtıcı adaletin üç boyutu üzerinde durmaktadır: Aralarında dağıtım yapılanlar (gelişmiş ülkeler, gelişmekte olan ülkeler, bugünkü nesiller, gelecek nesiller, bireyler, şirketler vs.), dağıtılanlar (atmosfer, emisyon hakları, gelecek nesillerin bugünkü nesillere emaneti, emisyon azaltım veya adaptasyon maliyeti vs.) ve dağıtım süreci (küresel iklim değişikliği rejiminde adil karar alma süreçleri vs.). Çalışmada Kyoto sonrası iklim müzakerelerinde dağıtıcı adalet ilkelerine dayalı bir anlaşmaya ulaşmanın son derece zor olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Zira farklı adalet ilkelerinin uygulanması taraflar için farklı sonuçlar doğurmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-iklim-degisikligi-dagitici-adalet.pdf
  • 2
183
203
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Adger, W. N. (2001), “Scales of Governance and Environmental Justice for Adaptation
and Mitigation of Climate Change”, Journal of International Development,
13(7), 921-931.
Arıkan, Y. (2006), Birleşmiş Milletler İklim Değişikliği Çerçeve Sözleşmesi ve Kyoto
Protokolü Metinler ve Temel Bilgiler, Bölgesel Çevre Merkezi REC-Türkiye,
http://iklim.cob.gov.tr/iklim/Files/REC_unfccc.pdf, (Erişim: 08.02.2013).
Ashton, J. and X. Wang (2003), “Equity and Climate Change”, Beyond Kyoto: Advancing
the International Effort against Climate Change, Pew Center on Global
Climate Change, http://www.researchsalons.crcresearch.org/filescrcresearch/
File/301_1074798164.pdf, (Erişim: 08.02.2013).
Bachram, H. (2004), “Climate Fraud and Carbon Colonialism: The New Trade in
Greenhouse Gases”, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 15(4), 1-16.
Baer, P. (2002), “Equity, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Global Common Resources”,
Ed. S. H. Schneider, A. Rosencranz, and J. Niles, Climate Change Policy: A
Survey, Washington D.C.: Island Press, 393-408.
Berk, M. M. and M. G. J. den Elzen (2001),“Options for Differentiation of Future
Commitments in Climate Policy: How to Realise Timely Participation to Meet
Stringent Climate Goals?”, Climate Policy, 1(4), 465-480.
Bode, S. (2004), “Equal Emissions Per Capita Over Time – A Proposal to Combine
Responsibility and Equity of Rights for Post-2012 GHG Emission Entitlement Allocation”,
European Environment, 14(5), 300-316.
Byrne, J. (2005), “Ellul and the Weather”, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society,
25(1), 4-16.
Byrne, J., C. Martinez, and L. Glover (2002), “A Brief in Environmental Justice”, Ed.
John Byrne, Cecilia Martinez and Leigh Glover, Environmental Justice: Discourses
in International Political Economy, Volume 8 Energy and Environmental Policy
Series. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers, 3-17.
Commission of the European Communities (2009), Communication from the
Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and
Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions towards a Comprehensive
Climate Change Agreement in Copenhagen, Brussels, 28.01.2009, http://eurlex.
europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0039:FIN:EN:PDF, (Erişim:
08.02.2013).
DeSombre, E. R. (2004), Response to the Global Warming Tragedy Global Warming:
More Common than Tragic”, Ethics and International Affairs, 18(1), 41-46.
ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 200 İİBF DERGİSİ
Echlin, E. P. (2008), “Climate Change Theology”, New Blackfriars, 89(1024), 715-
729.
Gardiner, S. M. (2004a), “Ethics and Global Climate Change”, Ethics, 114(3), 555-
600.
Gardiner, S. M. (2004b), “The Global Warming Tragedy and the Dangerous Illusion
of the Kyoto Protocol”, Ethics and Environmental Affairs, 18(1), 23-39.
Gardiner, S. M. (2006), “A Perfect Moral Storm: Climate Change, International
Ethics and the Problem of Moral Corruption”, Environmental Values, 15(3), 397-
413.
Glover, L. (1999), “Atmosphere for Sale: Inventing Commercial Climate Change”,
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 19(6), 501-510.
Grasso, M. (2007), “A Normative Ethical Framework in Climate Change”, Climatic
Change, 81(3-4), 223-246.
Grasso, M. (2008), “Edward A. Page, Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations”,
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics,
8(2), 183-186.
Grubb, M. (1995), “Seeking Fair Weather: Ethics and the International Debate on
Climate Change”, International Affairs, 71(3), 463-496.
Hadjilambrinos, C. (1999), “For Richer or for Poorer? The Role of Science, Politics,
and Ethics in the Global Climate Change Policy Debate”, Bulletin of Science, Technology
and Society, 19(6), 521-531.
Harris, P. G. (2003), “Fairness, Responsibility, and Climate Change”, Ethics and
International Affairs, 17(1), 149-156.
Harris, P. G. (2008), “Climate Change and Global Citizenship”, Law and Policy,
30(4), 481-501.
Hatfield, E. and R. L. Rapson (2007), “Equity Theory”, Ed. Roy F. Baumeister and
Kathleen D. Vohs, Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, Los Angles and London: Sage
Publications, 307-309.
Hayward, T. (2007), “Human Rights vs Emission Rights: Climate Justice and the
Equitable Distribution of Ecological Space”, Ethics and International Affairs, 21(4),
431-450.
IPCC (2007), Summary for Policymakers in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science
Basis. Ed. Soloman, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt,
M. Tignor and H.L. Miller, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge and
New York: Cambridge University Press.
EKİM 2013 201
Jagers, S. C. and G. Duus-Otterström (2008), “Dual Climate Change Responsibility:
On Moral Divergences between Mitigation and Adaptation”, Environmental Politics,
17(4), 576-591.
Jamieson, D. (1992), “Ethics, Public Policy, and Global Warming”, Science, Technology
and Human Values, 17(2), 139-153.
Kovel, J. (2008), Ecosocialism, Global Justice, and Climate Change”, Capitalism
Nature Socialism, 19(2), 4-14.
Kulkarni, J. S. (2003), “A Southern Critique of the Globalist Assumptions about
Technology Transfer in Climate Change Treaty Negotiations”, Bulletin of Science,
Technology and Society, 23(4), 256-264.
Mazlum, S. C. (2013a) “Küresel İklim Politikasında Yeni Döneme Açılan Kapı: Doha
Geçidi”, Ekoiq Dergisi, Şubat 2013, 92-96.
Mazlum, S. C. (2013b) “Doha Geçidi Nereye Açılıyor?”, Ecoiq Dergisi, Mart 2013,
82-85.
Meyer, L. H. and D. Roser (2006), “Distributive Justice and Climate Change”, Analyse
& Kritik, 28(2), 223-249.
Moore, M. (2008), “Global Justice, Climate Change and Miller’s Theory of Responsibility”,
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 11(4), 501-
517.
Muhovic-Dorsner, K. (2005), “Evaluating European Climate Change Policy: An Ecological
Justice Approach”, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 25(3), 238-
246.
Müller, B. (2001) “Varieties of Distributive Justice in Climate Change”, Climatic
Change, 48(2-3), 273-288.
Ott, H. E. and W. Sachs (2000), “Ethical Aspects of Emissions Trading”, Contribution
to the World Council of Churches Consultation on “Equity and Emission Trading-
Ethical and Theological Dimensions”, Saskatoon, Canada May 9-14, 2000,
http://wupperinst.org/uploads/tx_wupperinst/WP110.pdf, (Erişim: 08.02.2013).
Paavola, J. (2008), “Science and Social Justice in the Governance of Adaptation to
Climate Change”, Environmental Politics, 17(4), 644-659.
Page, E. (1999), “International Justice and Climate Change”, Political Studies,
47(1), 53-66.
Page, E. (2007a), “Equity and the Kyoto Protocol”, Politics, 27(1) 8-15.
Page, E. A. (2007b), “Fairness on the Day after Tomorrow: Justice, Reciprocity and
Global Climate Change”, Political Studies, 55(1), 225-242.
ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 202 İİBF DERGİSİ
Pan, J. (2003), “Emissions Rights and Their Transferability Equity Concerns over
Climate Change Mitigation”, International Environmental Agreements: Politics,
Law and Economics, 3(1), 1-16.
Pandey, D. N. (2004), “Equity in Climate Change Treaty”, Current Science, 86(2),
272-281.
Parks, B. C. and J. T. Roberts (2006), “Globalization, Vulnerability to Climate
Change, and Perceived Injustice”, Society and Natural Resources, 19(4), 337-355.
Paterson, M. (2001), “Principles of Justice in the Context of Global Climate
Change”, Ed. U. Luterbacher and D. F. Sprinz, International Relations and Global
Climate Change, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Posner, E. and C. R. Sunstein (2007), “Climate Change Justice”, Chicago John M.
Olin Law and Economics Working Paper no.354,
http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/files/354.pdf, (Erişim: 09.02.2013).
Roberts, J. T. and B. C. Parks (2007), A Climate of Injustice Global Inequality,
North-South Politics and Climate Policy, Cambridge, Massachuchetts, and London:
The MIT Press.
Rocholl, M. (2001), “From Environmental Space to Ecological Debt -a European
Perspective”, Speech delivered at the Conference 'Globalisation, Ecological Debt,
Climate Change and Sustainability', Republic of Benin, November 27-30 2001,
http://www.google.com.tr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=conference%20'globalisation%2C%2
0ecological%20dept%2C%20climate%20change%20and%20sustainability'%2C%20
republic%20of%20benin%2C%20november%2027-
30%202001&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rca
de.org%2Fcomisiones%2Fdecol%2Fmrocholl2.doc&ei=PCIaUfC3IITTsgaZwYA4&us
g=AFQjCNHNabRNFg1PHuyMqkugFnou-LQ4rQ, (Erişim: 12.02.2013).
Rosales, J. (2008), “Economic Growth, Climate Change, Biodiversity Loss: Distributive
Justice for the Global North and South”, Conservation Biology, 22(6), 1409-
1417.
Rose, A. and B. Stevens (1998), “A Dynamic Analysis of Fairness in Global Warming
Policy: Kyoto, Buenos Aires and Beyond”, Journal of Applied Economics, 1(2), 329-
362.
Sachs, W. (2006) Climate Change and Human Rights,
http://wupperinst.org/uploads/tx_wupperinst/Climate_Change_Human_Rights.p
df, (Erişim: 08.02.2013).
Schneider, S. H. (2006), “Climate Change: Do We Know Enough for Policy Action?”,
Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(4), 607-636.
Singer, P. (2006), “Ethics and Climate Change: A Commentary on MacCracken,
Toman and Gardiner”, Environmental Values, 15(3), 415-22.
EKİM 2013 203
Starkey, R. (2008), Allocating Emissions Rights: Are Equal Shares, Fair Shares?”,
Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Working Paper 118,
http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/publications/working_papers/twp118.pdf, (Erişim:
08.02.2013).
Stone, D. (2002), Policy Paradox The Art of Political Decision Making, New York
and London: W.W. Norton&Company.
Tucker, A. (2005), “Justice”, Ed. Rodney P. Carlisle, Encyclopedia of Politics the Left
and the Right Volume 2: The Right, Thousand Oaks and London: Sage Publications,
720-724.
Wesley, E. and F. Peterson (1999), “The Ethics of Burden Sharing in the Global
Greenhouse”, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 11(3), 167-196.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com