Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

On the Research Contribution of XBRL Literature - A Bibliometrics Analysis

Journal Name:

  • Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study is to investigate the research attributes and contribution of extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) literature in the past decade by employing bibliometrics analysis. Publications on XBRL topical area are used to complete two sections of analysis in this study. The first section examines the research intellectual network of XBRL by applying citation frequency count and cocitation analysis. The second section examines the content of XBRL publications by taxonomizing articles along multiple dimensions and providing descriptive statistics on research attributes. This study aims at contributing to accounting literature by shedding light on the recent research structure on XBRL and potential future directions.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-research-contribution-xbrl-literature-bibliometrics-analysis.pdf
  • 13
173
188
  • English

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Badua, F.A. (2005). Pondering Paradigms: Tracing the Development of Accounting Thought
with Taxonomic and Citation Analysis (Ph.D. Dissertation, Rutgers University).
BoveeM., M.L. Ettredge, R.P. Srivastava, M.A. Vasarhelyi. (2002). Does the Year 2000 XBRL
Taxonomy Accommodate Current Business Financial-Reporting Practice? Journal of
Information Systems. 16 (2): 165-182.
Bricker, R.(1989).An Empirical Investigation of the Structure of Accounting Research.Journal
of Accounting Research. 27(2): 246-262.
Brown, L.D. and J.C. Gardner (1985a).Using Citation Analysis to Assess the Impact of Journals
and Articles on Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR).Journal of Accounting Research.
23(1): 84-109.
Brown, L.D. and J. C. Gardner (1985b).Applying Citation Analysis to Evaluate the Research
Contributions of Accounting Faculty and Doctoral Programs. TheAccounting Review.60(2):
262.
Brown, L.D., J.C. Gardner, and M.A. Vasarhelyi (1987). An analysis of the research
contributions of Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1976-1984. Accounting,
Organizations and Society. 12(2): 193-204.
Brown, L.D., J.C. Gardner, M.A. Vasarhelyi (1993). Accounting Research Directory: The
Database of Accounting Literature. Princeton, M. Wiener.
Debreceny, R. and G.L., Gray (2001). The Production and use of semantically rich accounting
reports on the Internet: XML and XBRL. International Journal of Accounting Information
Systems.2 (1) 47-74.
Dyckman, T.R. and S.A. Zeff (1984). Two Decades of the Journal of Accounting Research.
Journal of Accounting Research.22 (1): 225-297.
Farewell, S.M. (2006).An Introduction to XBRL through the Use of Research and Technical
Assignments. Journal of Information Systems 20 (1): 161-185.
Garfield, E.(1972). Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation. Essays of an Information
Scientist. 1: 527-544.
Griffith, B.C., H.G. Small, J.A. Stonehill, and D. Sandra(1974). The Structure of Scientific
Literatures II: Toward a Macro- and Microstructure for Science. Science Studies. 4: 339-365.
Hofstedt, T.R.(1976). Behavioral accounting research: Pathologies, paradigms and
prescriptions. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1 (1): 43-58.
McCain, K.W. (1986). Cocited Author Mapping as a Valid Representation of Intellectual
Structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37(3): 111-122.
Hakan ERKUS & Victoria CHIU
Page | 188 EJBE 2014, 7 (13)
McCain, K.W. (1990). Mapping Authors in Intellectual Space: A Technical Overview. Journal of
the American Society for Information Science 41(6): 433-443.
McRae, T.W. (1974). A Citation Analysis of the Accounting Information Network. Journal of
Accounting Research 12(1): 80-92.
Noel, S., C,-H. H. Chu and V. Raghavan(2003). Co-Citation Count vs Correlation for Influence
Network Visualization. Information Visualization.1-11
Osareh, F. (1996a). Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis and Co-Citation Analysis - Part I. Libri
46(3): 149-158.
Osareh, F. (1996b). Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis and Co-Citation Analysis - Part II.Libri46(3):
217-225.
Price, D.(1963).Big Science, Little Science, Columbia University Press, New York.
Reiter, S.A. and P.F. Williams (2002). The Structure and Progressivity of Accounting Research:
The Crisis in the Academy Revisited. Accounting, Organization and Society.27: 575-607.
Richards, J., B. Smith, and A. Saeedi (2004). An Introduction to XBRL. Working Paper.
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship
Between Two Documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24(4): 265-
269.
Small, H. and B.C. Griffith (1974). The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and
Graphing Specialties. 4: 17-40.
Gamble, G.O. and B. O’Doherty (1985). Citation Indexing and Its Uses in Accounting: An
Awareness Survey and Departmental Ranking. Issues in Accounting Education. 3:28-41.
White, H.D. and B.C. Griffith (1981). Author Co citation: A Literature Measure of Intellectual
Structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 32 (3): 163-171.
Vasarhelyi, M. A. and J. Berk (1984).The Multiple Taxonomies of Accounting Research.
Working Paper, Columbia University.
Vasarhelyi, M.A. and D.H. Bao (1988).Trends in the Evolution of Scholarly Accounting
Thought: A Quantitative Examination. The Accounting Historians Journal. 15 (1): 45-64.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com