Buradasınız

The Impact of Turkey’s Domestic Resources on the Turkic Republics of the Caspian Sea

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper examines how Turkey’s domestic resources, which are Turkey’s historical, cultural and political relations with the Turkic states and Turkey’s economic interests in the region, affect Turkey’s foreign relations with Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. Findings show that the Turkic Republics’ interest in Turkish development model gradually declined starting from the 1994s. The hypothesis that the stronger socio-cultural ties between Turkey and the Turkic states are the closer the foreign relations are between Turkey and the Turkic states is applicable to all five republics. In the field of business the study finds that Turkish economy follows a similar pattern in its relations with the Azerbaijani and the Central Asian market. Common policy goals of Turkey and the five states led Turkey to establish close foreign relations with these five regional countries. The hypothesis that the more Turkey has business interests in the Caspian Sea Region the more Turkey will have closer foreign relations with Turkic states is mostly apparent in the case of Azerbaijan. In the area of energy politics Turkey has its strongest link with Azerbaijan. Besides being strong economic partners Turkey is Azerbaijan’s biggest supporter in the region against Armenia.
1-18

REFERENCES

References: 

Ajdari, Z. and Kazemi, F. (1998). “Ethnicity, Identity and Politics” in D. Menashri ( Ed.), Central Asia Meets the Middle
East, London: Frank Cass Publishing,
Akkok, F., Ayse B. and Demir, C. E., (2000). “The role of Turkish schools in the educational system and social transformation
of Central Asian countries: the case of Turkmenistan and Kyrgyzstan.” Central Asian Survey 19(1):
141–155.
Akturk, S. (2006). “Turkish–Russian Relations after the Cold War (1992–2002).” Turkish Studies 7(3): 337-64.
Akturk, S. (2006). “Turkish–Russian Relations after the Cold War (1992–2002)” Turkish Studies 7(3): 337-64.
Aras, B. (2002). The New Geopolitics of Eurasia and Turkey’s Position. London: Frank Cass Publishing.
Aydin, M. (2004). “Foucault's Pendulum: Turkey in Central Asia and the Caucasus.” Turkish Studies 5(2): 1-22.
Bacik, G. ( 2001) “Turkey and Pipeline Politics”. Turkish Studies 7(2): 293-306.
Bal, I. (2000). Turkey’s Relations with the West and Turkic Republics. England: Ashgate Publishing.
Chufrin, G. (2001). The Security of the Caspian Region. Stockholm: International Peace Research Institute.
Clawson, P. (1998). The Disintegration of the Soviet Union, In D. Menashri (Ed.) Central Asia Meets the Middle East
London: Frank Cass Publishing.
Dikkaya, M. and Keles I. (2006) “A case study of foreign direct investment in Kyrgyzstan.” Central Asian Survey
25(1-2): 149-156.
Findley, C. V. (2005). The Turks in World History. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fuller, G. E. (1998). The Impact of Central Asia on the New Middle East in D. Menashri (Ed.) Central Asia Meets the
Middle East, London: Frank Cass Publishing
Kendzior, S. (2006). “Redefining Religion: Uzbek Atheist Propaganda in Gorbachev-Era Uzbekistan.” Nationalities
Papers, 34(5): 533 – 548.
Kleveman, L. (2003). The New Great Game. New York: Grove Press.
London, K. (1965). The Making of Foreign Policy. New York: J.B.Lippincott Company.
Rosenau, J. N. (1969). Linkage Politics. New York: The Free Press.
TICA. (1996). “Turkmenistan Country Report” Ankara: TICA Publishing.
Winrow, G. (1995). Turkey in Post-Soviet Central Asia. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Yanik, L. (2004). “The Politics of Educational Exchange: Turkish Education in Eurasia.” Europe-Asia Studies 56(2):
293-307.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com