Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

A Healthy and Democratic Civil-Military Relationship in Turkey: Accountability of the both Entities

Journal Name:

  • European Journal of Economic and Political Studies

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Until recently the Turkish military was beyond criticism or control, as the self-styled guardians of Turkish Republic the military officers have seen themselves the only source to protect the main principals of the Republic. This self-appointed task, they thought, had given them the right to interfere with Turkish politics when they see fit. Yet, with the latest arrests of some very top-brass generals accused of plotting a military coup against the Justice and Development Party’s (AKP) government, it seems that the balance of power has shifted decisively. This paper explores the ways in which how far this balance could be maintained in a healthy civil-military relationship in a democratic country. The author suggests that the circumstances have been changed since the proclamation of Republic and Turkey is becoming a more and more self-confident country as she improves her relationships with neighbors and becoming a wealthier country due to several economic reforms. All in all, the citizens wish to live in a normal democratic country. So, the two entities, the civilians and the military, should be more accountable to each other, especially the military must learn the decisions of the public expressed in ballot polls.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-healthy-and-democratic-civil-military-relationship-turkey-accountability-both-entities.pdf

REFERENCES

References: 

Cook, Steven A. 2007. Ruling But Not Governing: The Military and Political Development in Egypt, Algeria,
and Turkey, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Díez, Jordi. 2008. Legislative Oversight of the Armed Forces in Mexico. Mexican Studies/Estudíos
Mexícanos, vol. 24(1): 113-145.
Feaver, Peter, and Richard H. Kohn. 2001. Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American
National Security. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Finer, Samuel E. 1988. The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO:
Westview.
Gibb, H. A. R. and H. L. Bowen 1950. Islamic Society and the West: A Study of the Impact of Western
Civilization on Moslem Culture in the Near East, London, Oxford University Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1961. The Common Defense: Strategic Programs in National Politics. New York:
Columbia University Press.
Jenkins, Gareth 2007. Continuity and change: prospects for civil–military relations in Turkey. International
Affairs, 83(2): 339–355.
Karsten, Peter. 1997. The Coup d’Etat and Control of the Military in Competitive Democracies. In To
Sheathe the Sword: Civil-Military Relations in the Quest for Democracy, ed. John Lovell, 149–163. Westport, CT:
Greenwood.
Peri, Yoram. 1983. Between Battles and Ballots: The Israeli Military in Politics. Cambridge, U.K., and New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Rouleau, Eric 2000. Turkey’s Dream of Democracy, Foreign Affairs, 79 (6): 100-114.
Stepan, Alfred C. 1971. The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Tavernise, Sabrina 2010. Army Ebbs, and Power Realigns in Turkey, New York Times, 1 March 2010.
Trimberger. Ellen Kay 1978. Revolution from Above: Military Bureaucrats and Development in Japan, Turkey,
Egypt, and Peru. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com