Buradasınız

State Owned Enterprises, Entrepreneurship and Local Development: A Case From Turkey

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study has examined the results of SOE policy by comparing two provinces in Turkey, one that was a would-be beneficiary of this policy and the other not. Statistical data and anecdotal evidence from in-depth interviews show that the SOEs increased labor costs, discouraged private entrepreneurship and guided locals to political, rather than productive solutions to their economic problems; regional development in the province in which SOEs dominated the regional economy was hindered. These results are in line with the reported outcomes of SOE policy adopted by Italian governments in order to promote development in southern Italy.
91-107

REFERENCES

References: 

Adelman I. 1999. “The role of government in economic development”Department of
Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy Division of Agricultural and
Natural Resources University of California at Berkeley Working Paper No. 890
Alesina A, S. Danninger and M. Rostagno 2001. “Redistribution through public
employment: The case of Italy” IMF Staff Papers 48 (3): 447-473
Apak K., C. Aydınelli and M. Akın.1952. Türkiye’de Devlet Sanayi ve Maadin İşletme-leri.İzmit: Selülöz Basımevi.
Baumol W. J. 1990.“Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive”
The Journal of Political Economy98(5): 893-921
Boltho A, C. Wendy and P. Scaramozzino 1997. “Will East Germany become a new
Mezzogiorno”Journal of Comparative Economics 24(3): 241-264
Boratav K. 1982. Türkiye’de Devletçilik.Ankara. Savaş Yayınları. 2
nd
Edition.
Brohman J. 1996 “Postwar Development in the Asian NIC: Does the Neoliberal Model
Fits the Reality?” Economic Geography 72 (2): 107-130
106
Buğra A. 1994. State and Business in Modern Turkey. State University of New York
Press.
Carree M.A. and A.R. Thurik 2003.“The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Economic
growth” In Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, edited by D.B.
Audretsch and Z.J. Acs, 437-471, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Çokgezen M. and T. Altun. 2010. “İş dünyasının gözünden Sivas ekonomisinin
40 yılı (1965-2005)” Paper presented at II. Yerel Ekonomi Kongresi, Cumhuriyet
Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, 17-19 Haziran 2010, Sivas
Çorum 1982. Yurt Ansiklopedisi, Anadolu Yayıncılık. İstanbul. 2045-2111
DİE (State Statistical Institute). 1964. Genel Sanayi ve İşyerleriSayımı: İmalatSanayi.
Ankara.
DİE (State Statistical Institute). 1971. Yıllık İmalatSanayi Anketi.Ankara.
DİE (State Statistical Institute). 1980. Genel Sanayi ve İşyerleriSayımı.Ankara.
DİE (State Statistical Istitute). 2004. İl Göstergeleri 1980-2003. Yayın no: 2902. Ankara.
Eraydın A. 2002. Yeni Sanayi Odakları: Yerel Kalkınmanın Yeniden Kavramsallaştırılması.
Ankara. ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi.
Florio M. 1996. “Large firms, entrepreneurship and regional development policy:
‘growth poles’ in the Mezzogiorno over 40 years” Entrepreneurship and
Regional Development, 8(3): 263-295
Kepenek Y. and N. Yentürk. 1994. Türkiye Ekonomisi. İstanbul. Remzi Kitabevi. 6.
Edition.
Keyman F. ve B. Koyuncu Lorasdağı 2010. Kentler: Anadolu’nun Dönüşümü, Türkiye’nin
Geleceği. Doğan Kitap. İstanbul.
2004. State-directed development: Political power and industrialization in the global
periphery, Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mahiroğulları A. 2009. “Cumhuriyet’ten günümüze Sivas’ta ekonomik yapı ve istihdam”
C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 10(1): 175-194
Özcan G.B. 2006. “A critical analysis of decentralization and local economic
development: the Turkish case”. Environment and Planning C: Government
and Policy 24(1): 117-138
Özötün, E. 1988. Türkiye gayrı safi yurtiçi hasılasının iller itibarıyle dağılımı 1979-1986.
Murat Çokgezen
European Journal of Economic and Political Studies
107
İSO Publications. Publication Number 1988/8. İstanbul.
Öztürk, M 1997. Türkiye’de sermaye birikiminin özellikleri –Kayseri Örneği. Ph.D. thesis
submitted to Marmara University.
Rondinelli D.A. 2008."Can Public Enterprises Contribute to Development? A Critical
Assessment and Alternatives for Management Improvement", In Public
Enterprises: Unresolved Challenges and New Opportunities, 21-42, United
Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, ST/ESA/
PAD/SER.E/69
Schumpeter, J.A. 1963. The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits,
Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Translated by R. Opie.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Short, R.P,1984. “The role of public enterprises: An International Statistical Compari-son”, In Public Enterprises in Mixed Economies: Some Macroeconomic Aspects.
Edited by R.H. Floyd, C. S. Gray, and R. P. Short, 110-181, IMF Washington
DC.
Sivas 1982. Yurt Ansiklopedisi. Anadolu Yayıncılık. İstanbul. 6876-6961
Stel, A. van, M. Carree, and R. Thurik 2004.“The Effect of Entrepreneurship on National
Economic Growth: An Analysis Using the GEM Database” Paper presented
at The first GEM research conference: “Entrepreneurship, Government
Policies, and Economic Growth” Berlin, 1-3 April 2004
Toninelli P. A. 2000. “The Rise and Fall of Public Enterprise: The Framework” In The
Rise and Fall of State-owned Enterprise in the western WorldEdited by P. A.
Toninelli, 3-24. Cambridge University Press.
Vickers J., Yarrow G. 1988. Privatization: An Economic Analysis.MIT Press. Cambridge.
Yenal, O. 1999. “Yarım Yüzyıllık İktisadi Milliyetçilik, 1923-1974” In İktisat Siyasası
Üzerine İncelemeler. O.Yenal. 145-158. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
Yıldırım H. 2007. “Developing External Locus of Control To Kill Entrepreneurship
Spirit in Regional Development: A Case of Zonguldak Coalfield in Turkey”
Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 9(13). 483-499

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com